Modeling fan effects on the time course of associative recognition

We investigated the time course of associative recognition using the response signal procedure, whereby a stimulus is presented and followed after a variable lag by a signal indicating that an immediate response is required. More specifically, we examined the effects of associative fan (the number of associations that an item has with other items in memory) on speed-accuracy tradeoff functions obtained in a previous response signal experiment involving briefly studied materials and in a new experiment involving well-learned materials. High fan lowered asymptotic accuracy or the rate of rise in accuracy across lags, or both. We developed an Adaptive Control of Thought-Rational (ACT-R) model for the response signal procedure to explain these effects. The model assumes that high fan results in weak associative activation that slows memory retrieval, thereby decreasing the probability that retrieval finishes in time and producing a speed-accuracy tradeoff function. The ACT-R model provided an excellent account of the data, yielding quantitative fits that were as good as those of the best descriptive model for response signal data.

[1]  J. F. Schouten,et al.  Reaction time and accuracy. , 1967, Acta psychologica.

[2]  T. Landauer.  Memory without organization: Properties of a model with random storage and undirected retrieval , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  John R. Anderson.  Language, Memory, and Thought , 1976 .

[4]  Myeong-Ho Sohn,et al.  An information-processing model of three cortical regions: evidence in episodic memory retrieval , 2005, NeuroImage.

[5]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Modeling Response Times for Two-Choice Decisions , 1998 .

[6]  J. Cerella,et al.  Strategy transitions during cognitive skill learning in younger and older adults: Effects of interitem confusability , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[7]  G. Bower,et al.  Human Associative Memory , 1973 .

[8]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  Comparing time-accuracy curves: Beyond goodness-of-fit measures , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  David E. Irwin,et al.  The dynamics of cognition and action: mental processes inferred from speed-accuracy decomposition. , 1988, Psychological review.

[10]  Eysenck Keane.  Cognitive Psychology, 6 , 2012 .

[11]  Michael Matessa,et al.  A Production System Theory of Serial Memory , 1997 .

[12]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Interference with real world knowledge , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The role of practice in fact retrieval. , 1985 .

[14]  Darryl W. Schneider,et al.  A memory-based model of Hick’s law , 2011, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The fan effect: New results and new theories. , 1999 .

[16]  John R. Anderson.  Interference: The relationship between response latency and response accuracy. , 1981 .

[17]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  Empirical approaches to information processing: Speed-accuracy tradeoff functions or reaction time — a reply , 1979 .

[18]  David A. Caulton,et al.  Retrieval dynamics in recognition and list discrimination: Further evidence of separate processes of familiarity and recall , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[19]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A model for evidence accumulation in the lexical decision task , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  M. Verde,et al.  Associative interference in recognition memory: A dual-process account , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[21]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Optimizing schedules of retrieval practice for durable and efficient learning: how much is enough? , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  E. Heit,et al.  Associative Recognition: a Case of Recall-to-reject Processing , 2022 .

[23]  John I. Yellott,et al.  Correction for guessing in choice reaction time , 1967 .

[24]  John R. Anderson.  How Can the Human Mind Occur in the Physical Universe , 2007 .

[25]  Tim Curran,et al.  Retrieval dynamics of recognition and frequency judgments: Evidence for separate processes of familiarity and recall. , 1994 .

[26]  Caren M. Rotello,et al.  Recall-to-Reject in Recognition: Evidence from ROC Curves ☆ ☆☆ , 2000 .

[27]  N. Jane Zbrodoff,et al.  Why is 9+7 harder than 2+3? Strength and interference as explanations of the problem-size effect , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[28]  Degree of learning and retrieval speed: Study time and multiple exposures. , 1984 .

[29]  M. Watkins,et al.  Buildup of Proactive Inhibition as a Cue-Overload Effect. , 1975 .

[30]  Hedderik van Rijn,et al.  The Locus of the Gratton Effect in Picture-Word Interference , 2010, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[31]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Reflections of the Environment in Memory Form of the Memory Functions , 2022 .

[32]  B. Dosher,et al.  Serial position and set size in short-term memory: The time course of recognition , 1989 .

[33]  Albert T. Corbett.  Retrieval dynamics for rote and visual image mnemonics , 1977 .

[34]  G. Mandler.  Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. , 1980 .

[35]  E. Wagenmakers.  A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[36]  John R. Anderson.  The Adaptive Character of Thought , 1990 .

[37]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Priming and Retrieval from Short-Term Memory: A Speed Accuracy Trade-Off Analysis , 1980 .

[38]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Speed and Accuracy in the Processing of False Statements About Semantic Information , 1982 .

[39]  C. Lebiere,et al.  The Atomic Components of Thought , 1998 .

[40]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Search and decision processes in recognition memory. , 1974 .

[41]  Tim Curran,et al.  Comparing retrieval dynamics in recognition memory and lexical decision , 1997 .

[42]  Leo Postman,et al.  Interference theory revisited. , 1976 .

[43]  C. Lebiere,et al.  An integrated theory of list memory. , 1998 .

[44]  H. Pashler.  Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[45]  Peter Dixon,et al.  Likelihood ratios: A simple and flexible statistic for empirical psychologists , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[46]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Working Memory: Activation Limitations on Retrieval , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[47]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[48]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  The effects of delay and interference: A speed-accuracy study , 1981, Cognitive Psychology.

[49]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Time course of item and associative information: implications for global memory models. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[50]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A note on modeling accumulation of information when the rate of accumulation changes over time , 1980 .

[51]  B. Dosher.  Effect of Sentence Size and Network Distance on Retrieval Speed. , 1982 .

[52]  A. Yonelinas.  Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[53]  D E Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. , 1997, Psychological review.

[54]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  AIC model selection using Akaike weights , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[55]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  An ARC-REM model for accuracy and response time in recognition and recall. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[56]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[57]  L L Jacoby,et al.  Isolating the contributions of familiarity and source information to item recognition: a time course analysis. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[58]  J. Schall,et al.  Neural Control of Voluntary Movement Initiation , 1996, Science.

[59]  Perry W. Thorndyke,et al.  Storage and retrieval processes in sentence memory , 1974 .

[60]  James L. McClelland.  On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. , 1979 .

[61]  A V Reed,et al.  Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off in Recognition Memory , 1973, Science.

[62]  D. Nikolic,et al.  A tandem random walk model of the SAT paradigm: response times and accumulation of evidence. , 2002, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[63]  P. Suppes,et al.  Contemporary Developments in Mathematical Psychology , 1976 .

[64]  J. Yellott.  Correction for fast guessing and the speed-accuracy tradeoff in choice reaction time , 1971 .

[65]  Adam N. Sanborn,et al.  Model evaluation using grouped or individual data , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[66]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Associative Interference and Retrieval Dynamics in Yes-No Recall and Recognition. , 1977 .

[67]  A. V. Reed,et al.  List length and the time course of recognition in immediate memory , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[68]  Leendert van Maanen,et al.  Accumulators in Context 1 Running head : ACCUMULATORS IN CONTEXT Accumulators in Context : An Integrated Theory of Context Effects on Memory Retrieval , 2008 .

[69]  John R. Anderson.  Retrieval of propositional information from long-term memory , 1974 .

[70]  Simon Farrell,et al.  Computational Modeling in Cognition: Principles and Practice , 2010 .

[71]  Frederick Verbruggen,et al.  Tscope: A C library for programming cognitive experiments on the MS Windows platform , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[72]  Wayne A. Wickelgren,et al.  Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics , 1977 .

[73]  Robert G Pachella,et al.  The Interpretation of Reaction Time in Information-Processing Research 1 , 1973, Human Information Processing.

[74]  Kenneth J. Malmberg,et al.  Recognition memory: A review of the critical findings and an integrated theory for relating them , 2008, Cognitive Psychology.

[75]  Caren M. Rotello,et al.  Recall processes in recognition memory , 2000 .

[76]  R. Ratcliff.  Modeling aging effects on two-choice tasks: response signal and response time data. , 2008, Psychology and aging.

[77]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[78]  I. J. Myung,et al.  Tutorial on maximum likelihood estimation , 2003 .

[79]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Competition and representation during memory retrieval: Roles of the prefrontal cortex and the posterior parietal cortex , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[80]  A. Yonelinas.  The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research , 2002 .

[81]  Pat Gunn,et al.  A rational account of memory predicts left prefrontal activation during controlled retrieval. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[82]  John R. Anderson.  Item-Specific and Relation-Specific Interference in Sentence Memory. , 1975 .

[83]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Long-Term Memory Search: An Intersecting Activation Process. , 1976 .

[84]  L. Jacoby.  A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory , 1991 .

[85]  Hedderik van Rijn,et al.  An accumulator model of semantic interference , 2007, Cognitive Systems Research.

[86]  R. Ollman.  Fast guesses in choice reaction time , 1966 .

[87]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Learning to achieve perfect timesharing: architectural implications of Hazeltine, Teague, and Ivry (2002). , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[88]  Daniel R. Little,et al.  Short-term memory scanning viewed as exemplar-based categorization. , 2011, Psychological review.

[89]  R. Ratcliff.  Modeling response signal and response time data , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.

[90]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Interference in memory for pictorial information , 1978, Cognitive Psychology.

[91]  Aimée M. Surprenant,et al.  Principles of Memory , 2009 .

[92]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. , 2001, Psychological review.

[93]  K. Oberauer,et al.  The integration of familiarity and recollection information in short-term recognition: modeling speed-accuracy trade-off functions , 2008, Psychological research.

[94]  B. Dosher.  Discriminating preexperimental (semantic) from learned (episodic) associations: A speed-accuracy study , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[95]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Eye Movements Do Not Reflect Retrieval Processes , 2004, Psychological science.

[96]  R Ratcliff,et al.  Continuous versus discrete information processing modeling accumulation of partial information. , 1988, Psychological review.

[97]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[98]  Lynne M. Reder,et al.  Models of recognition: A review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[99]  John R. Anderson.  Is human cognition adaptive? , 1991, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[100]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Similarity information versus relational information: Differences in the time course of retrieval , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[101]  Barbara Anne Dosher,et al.  The retrieval of sentences from memory: A speed-accuracy study , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[102]  John R Anderson,et al.  An integrated theory of the mind. , 2004, Psychological review.

[103]  M. Humphreys,et al.  Associative Interference Effects in Recognition and Recall , 1990 .