Information structure expectations in sentence comprehension

In English, new information typically appears late in the sentence, as does primary accent. Because of this tendency, perceivers might expect the final constituent or constituents of a sentence to contain informational focus. This expectation should in turn affect how they comprehend focus-sensitive constructions such as ellipsis sentences. Results from four experiments on sluicing sentences (e.g., The mobster implicated the thug, but we can't find out who else) suggest that perceivers do prefer to place focus late in the sentence, though that preference can be mitigated by prosodic information (pitch accents, Experiment 2) or syntactic information (clefted sentences, Experiment 3) indicating that focus is located elsewhere. Furthermore, it is not necessarily the direct object, but the informationally focused constituent that is the preferred antecedent (Experiment 4). Expectations regarding the information structure of a sentence, which are only partly cancellable by means of overt focus markers, may explain persistent biases in ellipsis resolution.

[1]  Charles Clifton,et al.  Effects of varying focus and accenting of adjuncts on the comprehension of utterances , 2002 .

[2]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Comprehension of Sluiced Sentences. , 1998 .

[3]  Audra Dainora Does Intonational Meaning Come From Tones or Tunes ? Evidence Against a Compositional Approach , 2002 .

[4]  C. Clifton,et al.  Focus, Accent, and Argument Structure: Effects on Language Comprehension , 1995, Language and speech.

[5]  Jason Merchant,et al.  The syntax of silence : sluicing, islands, and identity in ellipsis , 1999 .

[6]  Hanjung Lee,et al.  Linguistic complexity and information structure in Korean: Evidence from eye-tracking during reading , 2007, Cognition.

[7]  Britta Stolterfoht,et al.  Processing word order variations and ellipses: The interplay of syntax and information structure during sentence comprehension. , 2005 .

[8]  Ray Jackendoff,et al.  Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar , 1972 .

[9]  M. Horne Prosody, theory and experiment : studies presented to Gösta Bruce , 2000 .

[10]  G. Cinque A null theory of phrase and compound stress , 1993 .

[11]  Emiel Krahmer,et al.  On the alleged existence of contrastive accents , 2001, Speech Commun..

[12]  Alan Garnham,et al.  Late Closure in Context , 1998 .

[13]  K. Kiss Identificational focus versus information focus , 1998 .

[14]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat: doing phonetics by computer , 2003 .

[15]  C. Clifton,et al.  Effects of the Focus Particle Only and Intrinsic Contrast on Comprehension of Reduced Relative Clauses , 2000 .

[16]  A. Almor,et al.  Noun-phrase anaphors and focus: the informational load hypothesis. , 1999, Psychological review.

[17]  J. Fodor,et al.  Semantic focus and sentence comprehension , 1979, Cognition.

[18]  Katy Carlson,et al.  Parallelism and Prosody in the Processing of Ellipsis Sentences , 2002 .

[19]  J. Atlas,et al.  It-clefts, informativeness and logical form: Radical pragmatics (revised standard version) , 1981 .

[20]  D. Robert Ladd,et al.  Papers in Laboratory Phonology: Metrical representation of pitch register , 1990 .

[21]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Sentence Prosody: Intonation, Stress and Phrasing , 1996 .

[22]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Focus Identification during Sentence Comprehension: Evidence from Eye Movements , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  Stress shift and early pitch accent placement in lexical items in American English , 1994 .

[24]  P. Gordon,et al.  Memory interference during language processing. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  N. Kadmon,et al.  Formal Pragmatics: Semantics, Pragmatics, Presupposition, and Focus , 2001 .

[26]  H. H. Clark,et al.  What's new? Acquiring New information as a process in comprehension , 1974 .

[27]  E. Engdahl,et al.  The linguistic realization of information packaging , 2013 .

[28]  Larry Harrison,et al.  The Information Component , 1989 .

[29]  Eugene J. Dawydiak,et al.  Linguistic focus and good-enough representations: An application of the change-detection paradigm , 2004, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[30]  L. Frazier,et al.  Focus and the Interpretation of Pitch Accent: Disambiguating Embedded Questions , 2000 .

[31]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Deletion And Logical Form , 1976 .

[32]  K Carlson,et al.  The Effects of Parallelism and Prosody in the Processing of Gapping Structures , 2001, Language and speech.

[33]  Betty J. Birner,et al.  Information status and noncanonical word order in English , 1998 .

[34]  Kevin B Paterson,et al.  The Influence of only on Syntactic processing of “Long” Relative Clause Sentences , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[35]  Edward Gibson,et al.  Effects of NP type in reading cleft sentences in English , 2005 .

[36]  D. Robert Ladd,et al.  "Sagging transitions" between high pitch accents in English: experimental evidence , 2003, J. Phonetics.

[37]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  The Effect of Focus on Memory for Words in Sentences , 1995 .

[38]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure , 1984 .

[39]  K. Rayner,et al.  Linguistic focus affects eye movements during reading , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[40]  J. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Intonational structure in Japanese and English , 1986, Phonology.

[41]  Stephani Foraker,et al.  The role of prominence in pronoun resolution: Active versus passive representations , 2007 .

[42]  A. Garnham,et al.  Antecedent focus and conceptual distance effects in category noun-phrase anaphora , 2005 .

[43]  Simon P. Liversedge,et al.  The Influence of Focus Operators on Syntactic Processing of Short Relative Clause Sentences , 1999 .

[44]  Pauline Welby,et al.  Effects of Pitch Accent Position, Type, and Status on Focus Projection , 2003, Language and speech.

[45]  William A. Ladusaw,et al.  Sluicing and logical form , 1995 .

[46]  Simon P. Liversedge,et al.  Parsing with focus particles in context: Eye movements during the processing of relative clause ambiguities , 2005 .

[47]  Scott Weinstein,et al.  Centering: A Framework for Modeling the Local Coherence of Discourse , 1995, CL.

[48]  John Kingston,et al.  Salient pitch cues in the perception of contrastive focus , 1994 .

[49]  John Robert Ross,et al.  Constraints on variables in syntax , 1967 .

[50]  Roger Schwarzschild,et al.  GIVENNESS, AVOIDF AND OTHER CONSTRAINTS ON THE PLACEMENT OF ACCENT* , 1999 .

[51]  Maria Polinsky,et al.  Violations of information structure: An electrophysiological study of answers to wh-questions , 2007, Brain and Language.

[52]  Michael Rochemont,et al.  Focus in Generative Grammar , 1986 .

[53]  Mari Ostendorf,et al.  TOBI: a standard for labeling English prosody , 1992, ICSLP.

[54]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Processing focus structure and implicit prosody during reading: Differential ERP effects , 2007, Cognition.

[55]  Angelika Kratzer,et al.  Interpreting Focus: Presupposed or Expressive Meaning , 2004 .

[56]  Manfred Krifka,et al.  A Compositional Semantics for Multiple Focus Constructions , 1991 .

[57]  Weijia Ni,et al.  Sidestepping garden paths: Assessing the contributions of syntax, semantics and plausibility in resolving ambiguities , 1996 .

[58]  J. Pierrehumbert The phonology and phonetics of English intonation , 1987 .

[59]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Invoking Discourse-Based Contrast Sets and Resolving Syntactic Ambiguities ☆ , 2002 .

[60]  J. K. Bock,et al.  Intonational marking of given and new information: Some consequences for comprehension , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[61]  Mats Rooth A theory of focus interpretation , 1992, Natural Language Semantics.

[62]  Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel,et al.  The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI framework , 2003 .

[63]  C. Clifton,et al.  Focus in Relative Clause Construal , 1996 .

[64]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  The Interaction of Constraints on Prosodic Phrasing , 2000 .

[65]  Christopher Kennedy,et al.  Structural economy in the processing and representation Of gapping sentences , 2005 .

[66]  M. Glanzer,et al.  Two storage mechanisms in free recall , 1966 .