Quantifying the benefits of translation regulation in the unfolded protein response

Protein production can be regulated at the translation stage through modulation of mRNA activity and degradation. In the unfolded protein response in S. cerevisiae it works by regulating the conversion rate from a reservoir of passive mRNA to an active short-lived mRNA that is open for translation. We develop a mathematical model for translation regulation, and elucidate its properties in perspective of the size and timing of the unfolded protein response. Optimal response is obtained when active mRNA has high decay rate compared to both the conversion rate and the decay rate of passive mRNA. In that case the translation regulation can provide the observed pulse of chaperones that fast restore protein folding conditions in the endoplasmic reticulum. Finally, we discuss translation control in relation to other known mechanisms for stress responses. Feedback on the translation level is found to be superior to transcription when conditions necessitate a fast shift in protein concentration while retaining a small cost in terms of protein degradation.

[1]  P. Walter,et al.  A Novel Mechanism for Regulating Activity of a Transcription Factor That Controls the Unfolded Protein Response , 1996, Cell.

[2]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. , 2002, Science.

[3]  P. Walter,et al.  tRNA Ligase Is Required for Regulated mRNA Splicing in the Unfolded Protein Response , 1996, Cell.

[4]  A. Fire,et al.  Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans , 1998, Nature.

[5]  Peter Walter,et al.  The Transmembrane Kinase Ire1p Is a Site-Specific Endonuclease That Initiates mRNA Splicing in the Unfolded Protein Response , 1997, Cell.

[6]  J. Gregg,et al.  Allele-specific Holliday junction formation: a new mechanism of allelic discrimination for SNP scoring. , 2003, Genome research.

[7]  P. Walter,et al.  Purification and activity assays of the catalytic domains of the kinase/endoribonuclease Ire1p from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2001, Methods in enzymology.

[8]  L. Serrano,et al.  Engineering stability in gene networks by autoregulation , 2000, Nature.

[9]  U. Alon,et al.  Negative autoregulation speeds the response times of transcription networks. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Protein folding in the cell , 1992, Nature.

[11]  P. Walter,et al.  Translational attenuation mediated by an mRNA intron , 1997, Current Biology.

[12]  D. Botstein,et al.  Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  M. Gething.  Role and regulation of the ER chaperone BiP. , 1999, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[14]  K Sneppen,et al.  Thermodynamics of heat-shock response. , 1999, Physical review letters.

[15]  I. Dodd,et al.  Octamerization of lambda CI repressor is needed for effective repression of P(RM) and efficient switching from lysogeny. , 2001, Genes & development.

[16]  W. Burkholder,et al.  Specificity of DnaK-peptide binding. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  D. Botstein,et al.  Genomic expression programs in the response of yeast cells to environmental changes. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[18]  S. Gottesman,et al.  Stealth regulation: biological circuits with small RNA switches. , 2002, Genes & development.

[19]  K. Mori,et al.  Endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced mRNA splicing permits synthesis of transcription factor Hac1p/Ern4p that activates the unfolded protein response. , 1997, Molecular biology of the cell.

[20]  M. Magnasco,et al.  Decay rates of human mRNAs: correlation with functional characteristics and sequence attributes. , 2003, Genome research.

[21]  P. Walter,et al.  Intracellular signaling from the endoplasmic reticulum to the nucleus: the unfolded protein response in yeast and mammals. , 2001, Current opinion in cell biology.