Home working and social and mental wellbeing at different stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: Evidence from 7 longitudinal population surveys

Background Home working has increased since the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic’s onset with concerns that it may have adverse health implications. We assessed the association between home working and social and mental wellbeing among the employed population aged 16 to 66 through harmonised analyses of 7 UK longitudinal studies. Methods and findings We estimated associations between home working and measures of psychological distress, low life satisfaction, poor self-rated health, low social contact, and loneliness across 3 different stages of the pandemic (T1 = April to June 2020 –first lockdown, T2 = July to October 2020 –eased restrictions, T3 = November 2020 to March 2021 –second lockdown) using modified Poisson regression and meta-analyses to pool results across studies. We successively adjusted the model for sociodemographic characteristics (e.g., age, sex), job characteristics (e.g., sector of activity, pre-pandemic home working propensities), and pre-pandemic health. Among respectively 10,367, 11,585, and 12,179 participants at T1, T2, and T3, we found higher rates of home working at T1 and T3 compared with T2, reflecting lockdown periods. Home working was not associated with psychological distress at T1 (RR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.79 to 1.08) or T2 (RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.88 to 1.11), but a detrimental association was found with psychological distress at T3 (RR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.30). Study limitations include the fact that pre-pandemic home working propensities were derived from external sources, no information was collected on home working dosage and possible reverse association between change in wellbeing and home working likelihood. Conclusions No clear evidence of an association between home working and mental wellbeing was found, apart from greater risk of psychological distress during the second lockdown, but differences across subgroups (e.g., by sex or level of education) may exist. Longer term shifts to home working might not have adverse impacts on population wellbeing in the absence of pandemic restrictions but further monitoring of health inequalities is required.

[1]  C. Steves,et al.  Mental and social wellbeing and the UK coronavirus job retention scheme: Evidence from nine longitudinal studies , 2022, Social Science & Medicine.

[2]  J. Rubery,et al.  The Impact of Reduced Working Hours and Furlough Policies on Workers’ Mental Health at the Onset of COVID-19 Pandemic: A Longitudinal Study , 2022, Journal of Social Policy.

[3]  N. Bloom,et al.  How Hybrid Working From Home Works Out , 2022 .

[4]  J. Wels,et al.  Association between home working and mental health by key worker status during the Covid-19 pandemic. Evidence from four British longitudinal studies , 2022, Industrial health.

[5]  L. Delaney,et al.  Worker Stress, Burnout, and Wellbeing Before and During the COVID-19 Restrictions in the United Kingdom , 2022, Frontiers in Psychology.

[6]  S. Katikireddi,et al.  Psychological Distress Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Adults in the United Kingdom Based on Coordinated Analyses of 11 Longitudinal Studies , 2022, JAMA network open.

[7]  Lars-Kristian Lunde,et al.  The relationship between telework from home and employee health: a systematic review , 2022, BMC Public Health.

[8]  T. Tabuchi,et al.  Increased Work from Home and Low Back Pain among Japanese Desk Workers during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study , 2021, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[9]  Amanda Lee Hughes,et al.  The UK COVID-19 furlough scheme and associations with smoking, alcohol consumption and vaping: evidence from 8 UK longitudinal population surveys. , 2021, medRxiv.

[10]  S. Seedat,et al.  Women’s wellbeing and the burden of unpaid work , 2021, BMJ.

[11]  M. Laubichler,et al.  Working from home, quality of life, and perceived productivity during the first 50-day COVID-19 mitigation measures in Austria: a cross-sectional study , 2021, International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health.

[12]  A. McMunn,et al.  Gender differences in unpaid care work and psychological distress in the UK Covid-19 lockdown , 2021, PloS one.

[13]  A. Goodman,et al.  Missing at random assumption made more plausible: evidence from the 1958 British birth cohort. , 2021, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[14]  N. Kondo,et al.  Changes in work and life patterns associated with depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic: an observational study of health app (CALO mama) users , 2021, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[15]  Cyrille Lenoel,et al.  UK economic outlook: Brexit Britain in Covid recovery ward , 2021, National Institute Economic Review.

[16]  J. P. Hansen,et al.  Six Key Advantages and Disadvantages of Working from Home in Europe during COVID-19 , 2021, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[17]  M. Kumari,et al.  The mental health impact of COVID-19 and lockdown-related stressors among adults in the UK , 2020, Psychological Medicine.

[18]  Melissa L Graham,et al.  A rapid review of mental and physical health effects of working at home: how do we optimise health? , 2020, BMC Public Health.

[19]  M. Mckee,et al.  Changing probability of experiencing food insecurity by socioeconomic and demographic groups during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK , 2020, medRxiv.

[20]  M. Hensher.  Covid-19, unemployment, and health: time for deeper solutions? , 2020, BMJ.

[21]  J. P. Hansen,et al.  Working from home during COVID-19 pandemic: lessons learned and issues , 2020, Management & Marketing. Challenges for the Knowledge Society.

[22]  G. Iolascon,et al.  Characterization of Home Working Population during COVID-19 Emergency: A Cross-Sectional Analysis , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[23]  D. Bann,et al.  Changes in the behavioural determinants of health during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic: gender, socioeconomic and ethnic inequalities in 5 British cohort studies , 2020, medRxiv.

[24]  Heejung Chung,et al.  Working from home during the COVID-19 lockdown: changing preferences and the future of work , 2020 .

[25]  C. Rudolph,et al.  Individual differences and changes in subjective wellbeing during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. , 2020, The American psychologist.

[26]  E. Zang,et al.  Gender Differences in Telecommuting and Implications for Inequality at Home and Work , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[27]  Linna Sai,et al.  Towards a ‘virtual’ world: Social isolation and struggles during the COVID‐19 pandemic as single women living alone , 2020, Gender, work, and organization.

[28]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Covid-19 and Remote Work: An Early Look at Us Data , 2020 .

[29]  Eleftherios Giovanis,et al.  Implications of COVID-19: The Effect of Working From Home on Financial and Mental Well-Being in the UK , 2020, International journal of health policy and management.

[30]  Christine Grant,et al.  Systematically reviewing remote e-workers’ well-being at work: a multidimensional approach , 2018, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology.

[31]  A. Donner,et al.  Extension of the modified Poisson regression model to prospective studies with correlated binary data , 2013, Statistical methods in medical research.

[32]  Nicholas Bloom,et al.  Does Working from Home Work? Evidence from a Chinese Experiment , 2013 .

[33]  G. Zou,et al.  A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. , 2004, American journal of epidemiology.

[34]  S D Simon,et al.  Understanding the odds ratio and the relative risk. , 2001, Journal of andrology.