Approaches to Human and Machine Translation Quality Assessment
暂无分享,去创建一个
Stephen Doherty | Federico Gaspari | Joss Moorkens | Sheila Castilho | F. Gaspari | Sheila Castilho | Stephen Doherty | Joss Moorkens
[1] Jörg Tiedemann,et al. Statistical Machine Translation with Readability Constraints , 2013, NODALIDA.
[2] Jody Byrne,et al. Technical Translation: Usability Strategies for Translating Technical Documentation , 2006 .
[3] Doug Arnold,et al. Machine Translation: An Introductory Guide , 1994 .
[4] Dominic Stewart. From Pro Loco to Pro Globo , 2013 .
[5] Germán Sanchis-Trilles,et al. CASMACAT: An Open Source Workbench for Advanced Computer Aided Translation , 2013, Prague Bull. Math. Linguistics.
[6] Jenny Williams. Theories of Translation , 2013 .
[7] Philip Koehn,et al. Statistical Machine Translation , 2010, EAMT.
[8] Preslav Nakov,et al. Using Discourse Structure Improves Machine Translation Evaluation , 2014, ACL.
[9] Heiko Sacher,et al. Beyond Translation: Approaches to Interactive Products for Chinese Consumers , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..
[10] Alon Lavie,et al. METEOR: An Automatic Metric for MT Evaluation with High Levels of Correlation with Human Judgments , 2007, WMT@ACL.
[11] James S. Holmes. Translated!: Papers on Literary Translation and Translation Studies. With an introduction by Raymond van den Broeck , 1988 .
[12] Maarit Koponen,et al. Comparing human perceptions of post-editing effort with post-editing operations , 2012, WMT@NAACL-HLT.
[13] Joanna Drugan,et al. Quality In Professional Translation: Assessment and Improvement , 2013 .
[14] Lucia Specia,et al. Exploiting Objective Annotations for Minimising Translation Post-editing Effort , 2011, EAMT.
[15] Sharon O'Brien,et al. Assessing the Usability of Raw Machine Translated Output: A User-Centered Study Using Eye Tracking , 2014, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..
[16] Stuart Campbell,et al. Translation into the Second Language , 1998 .
[17] Anthony Pym,et al. Exploring Translation Theories , 2009 .
[18] Mona Baker,et al. In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation , 1993 .
[19] Deborah A. Coughlin,et al. Correlating automated and human assessments of machine translation quality , 2003, MTSUMMIT.
[20] Tiina Tuominen,et al. User-Centered Translation , 2014 .
[21] François Masselot,et al. A Productivity Test of Statistical Machine Translation Post-Editing in a Typical Localisation Context , 2010, Prague Bull. Math. Linguistics.
[22] Hwee Tou Ng,et al. Better Evaluation Metrics Lead to Better Machine Translation , 2011, EMNLP.
[23] Philipp Koehn,et al. Findings of the 2009 Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation , 2009, WMT@EACL.
[24] Paul Kussmaul,et al. Training the Translator , 1995 .
[25] Harold L. Somers,et al. Evaluating Machine Translation: the Cloze Procedure Revisited , 2000, TC.
[26] Jeremy Munday,et al. Introducing Translation Studies: Theories and Applications , 1991 .
[27] Joss Moorkens,et al. Under pressure: translation in times of austerity , 2017 .
[28] Richard Taffler,et al. Readability and Understandability: Different Measures of the Textual Complexity of Accounting Narrative , 1992 .
[29] Ralph Weischedel,et al. A STUDY OF TRANSLATION ERROR RATE WITH TARGETED HUMAN ANNOTATION , 2005 .
[30] Sharon O'Brien,et al. Correlations of perceived post-editing effort with measurements of actual effort , 2015, Machine Translation.
[31] Gorka Labaka,et al. A hybrid machine translation architecture guided by syntax , 2014, Machine Translation.
[32] Lluís Màrquez i Villodre,et al. A Smorgasbord of Features for Automatic MT Evaluation , 2008, WMT@ACL.
[33] Salim Roukos,et al. Bleu: a Method for Automatic Evaluation of Machine Translation , 2002, ACL.
[34] J. House. Translation quality assessment: A model revisited , 1997 .
[35] Wioleta Karwacka,et al. Quality assurance in medical translation , 2014 .
[36] R. Flesch. A new readability yardstick. , 1948, The Journal of applied psychology.
[37] B. Harris,et al. Toward a Science of Translation , 1977 .
[38] Hala Almaghout,et al. A survey of machine translation competences: Insights for translation technology educators and practitioners , 2015 .
[39] Noam Chomsky,et al. वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .
[40] Philipp Koehn,et al. Enabling Monolingual Translators: Post-Editing vs. Options , 2010, NAACL.
[41] Federico Gaspari. Online MT Services and Real Users? Needs: An Empirical Usability Evaluation , 2004, AMTA.
[42] Niels Ole Bernsen,et al. Evaluation and usability of multimodal spoken language dialogue systems , 2004, Speech Commun..
[43] R. Beaugrande,et al. Introduction to text linguistics , 1981 .
[44] Ana Guerberof Arenas. Correlations between productivity and quality when post-editing in a professional context , 2014, Machine Translation.
[45] Sigrid Klerke,et al. Reading metrics for estimating task efficiency with MT output , 2015, EMNLP 2015.
[46] Hans P. Krings,et al. Repairing Texts: Empirical Investigations of Machine Translation Post-Editing Processes , 2001 .
[47] Scott Kushner,et al. The freelance translation machine: Algorithmic culture and the invisible industry , 2013, New Media Soc..
[48] Hermann Ney,et al. Syntax-Oriented Evaluation Measures for Machine Translation Output , 2009, WMT@EACL.
[49] Katharina Reiss,et al. Grundlegung einer allgemeinen Translationstheorie , 1984 .
[50] Andrei Popescu-Belis,et al. Principles of Context-Based Machine Translation Evaluation , 2002, Machine Translation.
[51] Inger Lassen,et al. Accessibility and Acceptability in Technical Manuals: A Survey of Style and Grammatical Metaphor , 2003 .
[52] Sharon O'Brien. Post-editing of Machine Translation: Processes and Applications , 2014 .
[53] Andy Way,et al. Evaluating machine translation with LFG dependencies , 2007, Machine Translation.
[54] Colin Harrison,et al. Readability in the Classroom , 1980 .
[55] Lucia Specia,et al. Assessing the Post-Editing Effort for Automatic and Semi-Automatic Translations of DVD Subtitles , 2011, RANLP.
[56] Jun Tang,et al. Translating into English as a Non-Native Language: a translator trainer’s perspective , 2017 .
[57] Robert J. Hartsuiker,et al. The impact of machine translation error types on post-editing effort indicators , 2015, MTSUMMIT.
[58] Christian Federmann,et al. Appraise: an Open-Source Toolkit for Manual Evaluation of MT Output , 2012, Prague Bull. Math. Linguistics.
[59] R. P. Fishburne,et al. Derivation of New Readability Formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease Formula) for Navy Enlisted Personnel , 1975 .
[60] Joseph P. Turian,et al. Evaluation of machine translation and its evaluation , 2003, MTSUMMIT.
[61] Christina Schäffner,et al. From 'Good' to 'Functionally Appropriate': assessing translation quality , 1997 .
[62] Anthony Pym,et al. Translating as risk management , 2015 .
[63] Susanne Lauscher,et al. Translation Quality Assessment , 2000 .
[64] J. House. Translation Quality Assessment: Linguistic Description versus Social Evaluation , 1977 .
[65] Sheila C. M. de Sousa,et al. Measuring acceptability of machine translated enterprise content , 2016 .
[66] Maja Popovic,et al. chrF: character n-gram F-score for automatic MT evaluation , 2015, WMT@EMNLP.
[67] Stephen Doherty,et al. Translations| The Impact of Translation Technologies on the Process and Product of Translation , 2016 .
[68] Philipp Koehn,et al. Findings of the 2011 Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation , 2011, WMT@EMNLP.
[69] Alan K. Melby,et al. What Is Quality? A Management Discipline and the Translation Industry Get Acquainted , 2014 .
[70] Jakob Nielsen,et al. Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.
[71] Daniel Jurafsky,et al. Measuring machine translation quality as semantic equivalence: A metric based on entailment features , 2009, Machine Translation.
[72] Juliane House,et al. Translation Quality Assessment: Past and Present , 2014 .
[73] Nike K. Pokorn. Challenging the Traditional Axioms: Translation into a non-mother tongue , 2005 .
[74] Sharon O'Brien,et al. Towards predicting post-editing productivity , 2011, Machine Translation.
[75] Gideon Toury,et al. Descriptive translation studies and beyond , 1995 .
[76] Gavriel Salvendy,et al. Content Preparation and Management for Web Design: Eliciting, Structuring, Searching, and Displaying Information , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..
[77] Johann Roturier,et al. An investigation into the impact of controlled English rules on the comprehensibility, usefulness and acceptability of machine-translated technical documentation for French and German users , 2006 .
[78] George R. Doddington,et al. Automatic Evaluation of Machine Translation Quality Using N-gram Co-Occurrence Statistics , 2002 .
[79] M. J. Jones,et al. A Longitudinal Study of the Readability of the Chairman's Narratives in the Corporate Reports of a UK Company , 1988 .
[80] Philipp Koehn,et al. (Meta-) Evaluation of Machine Translation , 2007, WMT@ACL.
[81] Ilse Depraetere,et al. What counts as useful advice in a university post-editing training context? Report on a case , 2010, EAMT.
[82] Ondrej Bojar,et al. A Grain of Salt for the WMT Manual Evaluation , 2011, WMT@EMNLP.
[83] Victoria Arranz,et al. Document-Level Automatic MT Evaluation based on Discourse Representations , 2010, WMT@ACL.
[84] Sheila Castilho,et al. Does post-editing increase usability? A study with Brazilian Portuguese as target language , 2014, EAMT.
[85] Ilse Depraetere,et al. A contrastive analysis of five automated QA tools (QA Distiller 6.5.8, Xbench 2.8, ErrorSpy 5.0, SDLTrados 2007 QA Checker 2.0 and SDLX 2007 SP2 QA Check) , 2012 .