Minimal clinically important differences in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Simple Shoulder Test, and visual analog scale pain scores after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

[1]  Christopher B. Robbins,et al.  Establishing minimally important differences for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index in patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears. , 2018, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[2]  T. Wright,et al.  Quantifying success after total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important difference. , 2018, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[3]  R. Tashjian,et al.  Determining the minimal clinically important difference for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test, and visual analog scale (VAS) measuring pain after shoulder arthroplasty. , 2017, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[4]  D. Dines,et al.  What Change in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score Represents a Clinically Important Change After Shoulder Arthroplasty? , 2016, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  E. Ekman,et al.  Determining the clinical importance of treatment benefits for interventions for painful orthopedic conditions , 2015, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[6]  Gerald R. Williams,et al.  The societal and economic value of rotator cuff repair. , 2013, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  R. Tashjian,et al.  Minimal clinically important differences in ASES and simple shoulder test scores after nonoperative treatment of rotator cuff disease. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  R. Tashjian,et al.  Minimal clinically important differences (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for visual analog scales (VAS) measuring pain in patients treated for rotator cuff disease. , 2009, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[9]  A. Copay,et al.  Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods. , 2007, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[10]  S. Lowenstein,et al.  Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the simple shoulder test: psychometric properties by age and injury type. , 2007, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[11]  Brian R Wolf,et al.  Indications for Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review , 2007, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  C. Terwee,et al.  Incidence and prevalence of complaints of the neck and upper extremity in general practice , 2004, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[13]  C. Bombardier,et al.  Evaluation of clinically relevant changes in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the minimal clinically important improvement , 2004, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[14]  K. Bennell,et al.  Analysis of outcome measures for persons with patellofemoral pain: which are reliable and valid? , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  R. Epstein,et al.  Interpretation of quality of life changes , 1993, Quality of Life Research.

[16]  P. McClure,et al.  American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient self-report section: reliability, validity, and responsiveness. , 2002, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[17]  V C Mow,et al.  A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. , 1994, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[18]  R. Keller.  Outcomes Research in Orthopaedics , 1993, Instructional course lectures.

[19]  D. T. Harryman,et al.  A practical tool for evaluating function: The simple shoulder test , 1993 .