Bond strength of resin modified glass ionomer cement to primary dentin after cutting with different bur types and dentin conditioning.

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of different bur types and acid etching protocols on the shear bond strength (SBS) of a resin modified glass ionomer cement (RM-GIC) to primary dentin. Forty-eight clinically sound human primary molars were selected and randomly assigned to four groups (n=12). In G1, the lingual surface of the teeth was cut with a carbide bur until a 2.0-mm-diameter dentin area was exposed, followed by the application of RM-GIC (Vitremer - 3M/ESPE) prepared according to the manufacturer's instructions. The specimens of G2, received the same treatment of G1, however the dentin was conditioned with phosphoric acid. In groups G3 and G4 the same procedures of G1 and G2 were conducted respectively, nevertheless dentin cutting was made with a diamond bur. The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 24h, and then tested in a universal testing machine. SBS data were submitted to 2-way ANOVA (= 5%) and indicated that SBS values of RM-GIC bonded to primary dentin cut with different burs were not statistically different, but the specimens that were conditioned with phosphoric acid presented SBS values significantly higher that those without conditioning. To observe micromorphologic characteristics of the effects of dentin surface cut by diamond or carbide rotary instruments and conditioners treatment, some specimens were examined by scanning electron microscopy. Smear layer was present in all specimens regardless of the type of rotary instrument used for dentin cutting, and specimens etched with phosphoric acid presented more effective removal of smear layer. It was concluded that SBS of a RM-GIC to primary dentin was affected by the acid conditioning but the bur type had no influence.

[1]  M. C. Chain,et al.  Cimentos ionoméricos híbridos: força de adesão à dentina e mecanismo de união - uso da microscopia eletrônica , 2009 .

[2]  V. Sattabanasuk,et al.  Resin-dentin bond strength as related to different surface preparation methods. , 2007, Journal of dentistry.

[3]  H. Roberts Investigation into the Depth of Cure of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Restorative Materials , 2006 .

[4]  M. Buzalaf,et al.  Effect of adhesive systems associated with resin-modified glass ionomer cements. , 2006, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[5]  C. Davidson,et al.  Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of glass ionomers to enamel. , 2002, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[6]  M. Burrow,et al.  A comparison of microtensile bond strengths of several dentin bonding systems to primary and permanent dentin. , 2002, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[7]  F. Salama,et al.  Shear bond strength of six restorative materials. , 2001, The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry.

[8]  Abdalla Ai Morphological interface between hybrid ionomers and dentin with and without smear-layer removal. , 2000 .

[9]  A. Abdalla Morphological interface between hybrid ionomers and dentin with and without smear-layer removal. , 2000, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[10]  M. Miyazaki,et al.  Resin-modified glass-ionomers: effect of dentin primer application on the development of bond strength. , 1999, European journal of oral sciences.

[11]  M. Burrow,et al.  Adhesion of resin-modified glass ionomer cements using resin bonding systems. , 1998, Journal of dentistry.

[12]  K. Nakanuma,et al.  Effect of the application of dentin primers and a dentin bonding agent on the adhesion between the resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and dentin. , 1998, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[13]  F. García-Godoy,et al.  Bond strengths of resin-modified glass ionomers and polyacid-modified resin composites to dentin. , 1997, American journal of dentistry.

[14]  J. Tagami,et al.  Bond strength and interface micromorphology of an improved resin-modified glass ionomer cement. , 1997, American journal of dentistry.

[15]  E. Swift,et al.  Shear bond strengths of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials. , 1995, Operative dentistry.

[16]  R. Erickson,et al.  Bonding to tooth structure: a comparison of glass-ionomer and composite-resin systems. , 1994, Journal of esthetic dentistry.

[17]  D. Pashley,et al.  Effects of dentin surface treatments on the shear bond strength of Vitrabond. , 1992, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[18]  D. Pashley,et al.  Effects of high-speed cutting on dentin permeability and bonding. , 1991, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[19]  E. Davis,et al.  Effect of dentinal pretreatment on bond strength between glass-ionomer cement and dentin. , 1990, Operative dentistry.

[20]  D. Retief,et al.  Effect of dentin surface roughness on shear bond strength. , 1990, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[21]  J. Ferracane,et al.  Properties of a glass-ionomer/resin-composite hybrid material. , 1989, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[22]  A. Walls Glass polyalkenoate (glass-ionomer) cements: a review. , 1986, E -journal of dentistry.

[23]  Gwinnett Aj Smear layer: morphological considerations. , 1984 .

[24]  A. Gwinnett Smear layer: morphological considerations. , 1984, Operative dentistry. Supplement.

[25]  A. D. Wilson,et al.  Improved adhesion of a glass ionomer cement to dentin and enamel. , 1982, Journal of dental research.

[26]  P. Glantz,et al.  The effect of some cleaning solutions on the morphology of dentin prepared in different ways: an in-vivo study. , 1979, ASDC journal of dentistry for children.

[27]  R Garberoglio,et al.  Scanning electron microscopic investigation of human dentinal tubules. , 1976, Archives of oral biology.

[28]  A. D. Wilson,et al.  A new translucent cement for dentistry. The glass ionomer cement , 1972, British Dental Journal.

[29]  J. Eick,et al.  Scanning Electron Microscopy of Cut Tooth Surfaces and Identification of Debris by Use of the Electron Microprobe , 1970, Journal of dental research.