Intuitive Impedance Modulation in Haptic Control Using Electromyography

Humans have multiple ways to adapt their arm dynamics to the task they have to perform. One way of doing this is through co-contraction of antagonist muscles. In telemanipulation this ability is easily lost due to time delays, quantization effects, bandwidth or hardware limitations. In this work a new concept for telemanipulation is presented. The end-point stiffness of a (simulated) telerobot is controlled via a variable impedance controller. The end effector stiffness scales with an estimate of the co-contraction around the elbow of the teleoperator. The telemanipulation concept was evaluated with ten subjects that performed two telemanipulation tasks in six different conditions. Three impedance levels: low, high, and variable, and two delay settings. The first task was on positioning accuracy, the second task on impact minimization. We have shown that low and variable impedance performed significantly better on the force task than high impedance. We have also shown that high and variable impedance performed significantly better on the position task than low impedance. This shows that the human ability to control arm stiffness can effectively be transferred to a telemanipulated robot.

[1]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Tele-impedance: Teleoperation with impedance regulation using a body–machine interface , 2012, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[2]  Stefano Stramigioli,et al.  Bilateral Telemanipulation With Time Delays: A Two-Layer Approach Combining Passivity and Transparency , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[3]  Günter Niemeyer,et al.  Real-time estimation of human impedance for haptic interfaces , 2009, World Haptics 2009 - Third Joint EuroHaptics conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems.

[4]  Dale A. Lawrence Stability and transparency in bilateral teleoperation , 1993, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[5]  Juliane Junker,et al.  Kinesiology Scientific Basis Of Human Motion , 2016 .

[6]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Tele-manipulation with a humanoid robot under autonomous joint impedance regulation and vibrotactile balancing feedback , 2014, 2014 IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[7]  Septimiu E. Salcudean,et al.  Analysis of Control Architectures for Teleoperation Systems with Impedance/Admittance Master and Slave Manipulators , 2001, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[8]  Günter Niemeyer,et al.  User-controlled variable impedance teleoperation , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  Gi-Hun Yang,et al.  Estimation of human arm impedance in accordance with the master device types and gripping posture , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM).

[10]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Controlling impedance at the man/machine interface , 1989, Proceedings, 1989 International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  Jong-Phil Kim,et al.  Robustly Stable Haptic Interaction Control using an Energy-bounding Algorithm , 2010, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[12]  Chenguang Yang,et al.  Development of a user experience enhanced teleoperation approach , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Mechatronics (ICARM).

[13]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Time domain passivity control of haptic interfaces , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[14]  Hyung-Soon Park,et al.  Transparent teleoperation using two-channel control architectures , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[15]  H. Gomi,et al.  Multijoint muscle regulation mechanisms examined by measured human arm stiffness and EMG signals. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Ming C. Lin,et al.  Haptic Rendering : Foundations, Algorithms, and Applications , 2008 .

[17]  Maxime Gautier,et al.  Dynamic identification of the Kuka LightWeight robot: Comparison between actual and confidential Kuka's parameters , 2014, 2014 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics.

[18]  Jean-Jacques E. Slotine,et al.  Stable Adaptive Teleoperation , 1990, 1990 American Control Conference.

[19]  Jan F. Broenink,et al.  on Innovative Robot Control Architectures for Demanding ( Research ) Applications – How to Modify and Enhance Commercial Controllers – , 2010 .

[20]  Rieko Osu,et al.  Short- and long-term changes in joint co-contraction associated with motor learning as revealed from surface EMG. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  J. Edward Colgate,et al.  Passivity of a class of sampled-data systems: Application to haptic interfaces , 1997, J. Field Robotics.

[22]  Stefano Stramigioli,et al.  Stability of position-based bilateral telemanipulation systems by damping injection , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[23]  Wilfried Philips,et al.  Effect of video lag on laparoscopic surgery: correlation between performance and usability at low latencies , 2017, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.