Proximal gamma-ray spectrometry for site-independent in situ prediction of soil texture on ten heterogeneous fields in Germany using support vector machines

Abstract Gamma spectrometric field measurements may provide high resolution information on topsoil texture. Yet, calibrations for the estimation of texture data usually have to be done site-specifically. The lack of site-independent calibrations thus limits the easy and universal use of proximal gamma-ray sensing in soil mapping and precision agriculture. Our objective was to develop a study site-independent prediction model for topsoil texture from gamma-ray spectra. We surveyed ten study sites across Germany with 417 reference samples (291 for calibration, 126 for test set-validation), providing soils from a broad range of parent materials and with widely varying soil texture. First, study site-specific models were calibrated by a linear regression approach. These models provided reliable estimations of sand, silt, and clay for most of the study sites. Second, study site-independent models were calibrated via i) linear regression and ii) support vector machines (SVM), the latter being mathematical methods of data pattern recognition. Based on the non-linear relationship between gamma spectrum and soil texture, which varied widely between the different parent materials the linear models are not appropriate for satisfactory soil texture prediction (averaged R 2 of 0.73 for sand, 0.61 for silt, and 0.18 for clay and averaged absolute prediction errors of 9 to 5%, respectively). In contrast, the SVM calibrated prediction models revealed reliable performance also for site-independent calibrations. With the non-linear SVM approach we were able to include all sites in one single prediction model for each texture fraction although the different mineralogical composition of their parent materials led to complex and partly opposing relationships between gamma features and soil texture. Site-independent predictions via SVM were often even better than site-specific linear regression models. The site-independent SVM calibrated predictions yielded an averaged R 2 of 0.96 (sand), 0.93 (silt), and 0.78 (clay), and corresponding averaged absolute prediction errors of 2 to 4%, respectively. To summarize, (i) non-linear prediction models are a feasible approach for capable site-independent texture estimations across a wide range of soils and (ii) gamma spectrometry-based texture predictions are a valuable input for applications that require highly resolved texture information at low costs and efforts.

[1]  K. Smettem,et al.  Use of airborne gamma radiometric data for soil property and crop biomass assessment. , 2003 .

[2]  F. Scheffer,et al.  Lehrbuch der Bodenkunde , 1971, Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde und Pflanzenschutz.

[3]  Gabriele Moser,et al.  Partially Supervised classification of remote sensing images through SVM-based probability density estimation , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  M. Richardson,et al.  The Radiometric Map of Australia , 2009 .

[5]  P. Miller,et al.  Validation requirements for diffuse reflectance soil characterization models with a case study of VNIR soil C prediction in Montana , 2005 .

[6]  Eldert J. van Henten,et al.  Proximal Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy to Predict Soil Properties Using Windows and Full-Spectrum Analysis Methods , 2013, Sensors.

[7]  E. M. Schetselaar,et al.  Guidelines for radioelement mapping using gamma ray spectrometry data : also as open access e-book , 2003 .

[8]  L. Hoffmann,et al.  Measuring soil organic carbon in croplands at regional scale using airborne imaging spectroscopy , 2010 .

[9]  Alex B. McBratney,et al.  Multivariate calibration of hyperspectral γ‐ray energy spectra for proximal soil sensing , 2007 .

[10]  T. Wonik Gamma-ray measurements in the Kirchrode I and II boreholes , 2001 .

[11]  F. J. Acevedo,et al.  Classification of wines produced in specific regions by UV-visible spectroscopy combined with support vector machines. , 2007, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.

[12]  D. Sauer,et al.  Saprolite, soils, and sediments in the Rhenish Massif as records of climate and landscape history , 2006 .

[13]  J. Franke,et al.  Soil heterogeneity at the field scale: a challenge for precision crop protection , 2008, Precision Agriculture.

[14]  Simon E. Cook,et al.  Use of airborne gamma radiometric data for soil mapping , 1996 .

[15]  Annette Freibauer,et al.  Field-based soil-texture estimates could replace laboratory analysis , 2016 .

[16]  John Triantafilis,et al.  Digital soil pattern recognition in the lower Namoi valley using numerical clustering of gamma-ray spectrometry data , 2013 .

[17]  Richard J. Harper,et al.  Use of on-ground gamma-ray spectrometry to measure plant-available potassium and other topsoil attributes , 1999 .

[18]  R. M. Lark,et al.  Understanding airborne radiometric survey signals across part of eastern England , 2007 .

[19]  Tina Wunderlich,et al.  Characterization of some Middle European soil textures by gamma‐spectrometry , 2012 .

[20]  Edoardo A.C. Costantini,et al.  Can γ-radiometrics predict soil textural data and stoniness in different parent materials? A comparison of two machine-learning methods , 2014 .

[21]  Thomas Scholten,et al.  The spectrum-based learner: A new local approach for modeling soil vis–NIR spectra of complex datasets , 2013 .

[22]  Robin Gebbers,et al.  Precision Agriculture and Food Security , 2010, Science.

[23]  Thomas R. Carroll,et al.  AIRBORNE SOIL MOISTURE MEASUREMENT USING NATURAL TERRESTRIAL GAMMA RADIATION , 1981 .

[24]  C. Hurburgh,et al.  Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy–Principal Components Regression Analyses of Soil Properties , 2001 .

[25]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[26]  Jungho Im,et al.  ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing , 2022 .

[27]  K. Stahr,et al.  The potential of gamma-ray spectrometry for soil mapping. , 2010 .

[28]  Ovidiu Ivanciuc,et al.  Applications of Support Vector Machines in Chemistry , 2007 .

[29]  Ulrike Werban,et al.  Relationships between gamma-ray data and soil properties at an agricultural test site , 2013 .

[30]  Richard J. Harper,et al.  Determination of Spatial Distribution Patterns of Clay and Plant Available Potassium Contents in Surface Soils at the Farm Scale using High Resolution Gamma Ray Spectrometry , 2006, Plant and Soil.

[31]  R. MacMillan,et al.  Use of Airborne Gamma Radiometrics to Infer Soil Properties for a Forested Area in British Columbia, Canada , 2013 .

[32]  Viacheslav I. Adamchuk,et al.  On-the-go soil sensors for precision agriculture , 2004 .

[33]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  Proximal Soil Sensing , 2010 .

[34]  J. Wilford,et al.  Application of airborne gamma-ray spectrometry in soil/regolith mapping and applied geomorphology , 1997 .

[35]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[36]  R. V. Rossel,et al.  Using data mining to model and interpret soil diffuse reflectance spectra. , 2010 .

[37]  Kazuko Megumi,et al.  Concentration of uranium series nuclides in soil particles in relation to their size , 1977 .