Performance measurement of PSF modeling reconstruction (True X) on Siemens Biograph TruePoint TrueV PET/CT

ObjectiveThe Siemens Biograph TruePoint TrueV (B-TPTV) positron emission tomography (PET) scanner performs 3D PET reconstruction using a system matrix with point spread function (PSF) modeling (called the True X reconstruction). PET resolution was dramatically improved with the True X method. In this study, we assessed the spatial resolution and image quality on a B-TPTV PET scanner. In addition, we assessed the feasibility of animal imaging with a B-TPTV PET and compared it with a microPET R4 scanner.MethodsSpatial resolution was measured at center and at 8 cm offset from the center in transverse plane with warm background activity. True X, ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) without PSF modeling, and filtered back-projection (FBP) reconstruction methods were used. Percent contrast (% contrast) and percent background variability (% BV) were assessed according to NEMA NU2-2007. The recovery coefficient (RC), non-uniformity, spill-over ratio (SOR), and PET imaging of the Micro Deluxe Phantom were assessed to compare image quality of B-TPTV PET with that of the microPET R4.ResultsWhen True X reconstruction was used, spatial resolution was <3.65 mm with warm background activity. % contrast and % BV with True X reconstruction were higher than those with the OSEM reconstruction algorithm without PSF modeling. In addition, the RC with True X reconstruction was higher than that with the FBP method and the OSEM without PSF modeling method on the microPET R4. The non-uniformity with True X reconstruction was higher than that with FBP and OSEM without PSF modeling on microPET R4. SOR with True X reconstruction was better than that with FBP or OSEM without PSF modeling on the microPET R4.ConclusionsThis study assessed the performance of the True X reconstruction. Spatial resolution with True X reconstruction was improved by 45 % and its % contrast was significantly improved compared to those with the conventional OSEM without PSF modeling reconstruction algorithm. The noise level was higher than that with the other reconstruction algorithm. Therefore, True X reconstruction should be used with caution when quantifying PET data.

[1]  Jae Sung Lee,et al.  Positron emission tomography (PET) detectors with depth-of- interaction (DOI) capability , 2011 .

[2]  Ronald Boellaard,et al.  Performance evaluation of the ECAT HRRT: an LSO-LYSO double layer high resolution, high sensitivity scanner , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  D. Townsend,et al.  An Assessment of the Impact of Incorporating Time-of-Flight Information into Clinical PET/CT Imaging , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  Vladimir Y. Panin,et al.  Fully 3-D PET reconstruction with system matrix derived from point source measurements , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Hye-Sun An,et al.  Performance measurements of Positron Emission Tomographs using NEMA NU 2-2007 , 2009 .

[6]  Nadim Joni Shah,et al.  Fully-3D PET Image Reconstruction Using Scanner-Independent, Adaptive Projection Data and Highly Rotation-Symmetric Voxel Assemblies , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  L. J. Thomas,et al.  Noise and Edge Artifacts in Maximum-Likelihood Reconstructions for Emission Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  Christer Halldin,et al.  Advancement in PET quantification using 3D-OP-OSEM point spread function reconstruction with the HRRT , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[9]  Stefano Fanti,et al.  Role of small animal PET for molecular imaging in pre-clinical studies , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[10]  R. Lecomte,et al.  Detector response models for statistical iterative image reconstruction in high resolution PET , 1998, 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.98CH36255).

[11]  S. Blinder,et al.  Scanning rodents on the High Resolution Research Tomograph (HRRT) with point spread function reconstruction: A feasibility study , 2010, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposuim & Medical Imaging Conference.

[12]  R. N. Goble,et al.  Performance evaluation of the microPET R4 PET scanner for rodents , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[13]  Martin Gotthardt,et al.  Image-Quality Assessment for Several Positron Emitters Using the NEMA NU 4-2008 Standards in the Siemens Inveon Small-Animal PET Scanner , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  B. Bendriem,et al.  Performance Characteristics of a New LSO PET/CT Scanner With Extended Axial Field-of-View and PSF Reconstruction , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[15]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Noise and signal properties in PSF-based fully 3D PET image reconstruction: an experimental evaluation , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Keiichi Magota,et al.  Performance characterization of the Inveon preclinical small-animal PET/SPECT/CT system for multimodality imaging , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.