Reproducibility of BOLD‐based functional MRI obtained at 4 T

The reproducibility of activation patterns in the whole brain obtained by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiments at 4 Tesla was studied with a simple finger‐opposition task. Six subjects performed three runs in one session, and each run was analyzed separately with the t‐test as a univariate method and Fisher's linear discriminant analysis as a multivariate method. Detrending with a first‐ and third‐order polynomial as well as logarithmic transformation as preprocessing steps for the t‐test were tested for their impact on reproducibility. Reproducibility across the whole brain was studied by using scatter plots of statistical values and calculating the correlation coefficient between pairs of activation maps. In order to compare reproducibility of “activated” voxels across runs, subjects and models, 2% of all voxels in the brain with the highest statistical values were classified as activated. The analysis of reproducible activated voxels was performed for the whole brain and within regions of interest. We found considerable variability in reproducibility across subjects, regions of interest, and analysis methods. The t‐test on the linear detrended data yielded better reproducibility than Fisher's linear discriminant analysis, and therefore seems to be a robust although conservative method. Preliminary data indicate that these modeling results may be reversed by preprocessing to reduce respiratory and cardiac physiological noise effects. The reproducibility of both the position and number of activated voxels in the sensorimotor cortex was highest, while that of the supplementary motor area was much lower, with reproducibility of the cerebellum falling in between the other two areas. Hum. Brain Mapping 7:267–283, 1999. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  J R Moeller,et al.  A Regional Covariance Approach to the Analysis of Functional Patterns in Positron Emission Tomographic Data , 1991, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[3]  R. Turner,et al.  Functional mapping of the human visual cortex at 4 and 1.5 tesla using deoxygenation contrast EPI , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Automated image registration , 1993 .

[5]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Functional brain mapping by blood oxygenation level-dependent contrast magnetic resonance imaging. A comparison of signal characteristics with a biophysical model. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[6]  E C Wong,et al.  Processing strategies for time‐course data sets in functional mri of the human brain , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  B. Rosen,et al.  Microscopic susceptibility variation and transverse relaxation: Theory and experiment , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  Jens Frahm,et al.  On the use of temporal correlation coefficients for magnetic resonance mapping of functional brain activation: Individualized thresholds and spatial response delineation , 1995, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[9]  R. Turner,et al.  Characterizing Dynamic Brain Responses with fMRI: A Multivariate Approach , 1995, NeuroImage.

[10]  R. Woods,et al.  Principal Component Analysis and the Scaled Subprofile Model Compared to Intersubject Averaging and Statistical Parametric Mapping: I. “Functional Connectivity” of the Human Motor System Studied with [15O]Water PET , 1995, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[11]  L. Katz,et al.  Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language , 1995, Nature.

[12]  Peter A. Bandettini,et al.  Effects of biophysical and physiologic parameters on brain activation‐induced R2* and R2 changes: Simulations using a deterministic diffusion model , 1995, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[13]  X Hu,et al.  Retrospective estimation and correction of physiological fluctuation in functional MRI , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  D. A. Wolf Recent advances in descriptive multivariate analysis , 1996 .

[16]  S. C. Strother,et al.  Multidimensional state-spaces for fMRI and PET activation studies , 1996, NeuroImage.

[17]  R. Cox,et al.  Test-retest precision of functional MR in sensory and motor task activation. , 1996, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[18]  S C Strother,et al.  Abnormal cerebral glucose metabolism in HIV-1 seropositive subjects with and without dementia. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  M Diemling,et al.  Reproducibility and postprocessing of gradient-echo functional MRI to improve localization of brain activity in the human visual cortex. , 1996, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[20]  N Lange Statistical approaches to human brain mapping by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1996, Statistics in medicine.

[21]  J. Pekar,et al.  Whole-brain functional mapping with isotropic MR imaging. , 1996, Radiology.

[22]  X Hu,et al.  Artifact reduction in EPI with phase‐encoded reference scan , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  K. Uğurbil,et al.  Experimental determination of the BOLD field strength dependence in vessels and tissue , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  T H Le,et al.  Methods for assessing accuracy and reliability in functional MRI , 1997, NMR in biomedicine.

[25]  Stephan Arndt,et al.  A method to determine activation thresholds in fMRI paradigms , 1997, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[26]  P. Skudlarski,et al.  An fMRI study of the human cortical motor system response to increasing functional demands. , 1997, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[27]  C. Genovese,et al.  Estimating test‐retest reliability in functional MR imaging I: Statistical methodology , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  P. Mitra,et al.  The nature of spatiotemporal changes in cerebral hemodynamics as manifested in functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  D C Noll,et al.  Estimating test‐retest reliability in functional MR imaging II: Application to motor and cognitive activation studies , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  L. K. Hansen,et al.  Activation pattern reproducibility: Measuring the effects of group size and data analysis models , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[31]  N Lange,et al.  An Empirical Study of Statistical Model Complexity in Neuro-fMRI , 1998, NeuroImage.

[32]  Iwao Kanno,et al.  On the Detection of Activation Patterns Using Principal Components Analysis , 1998 .

[33]  Satterthwaite Corrections For Homogeneity of Variance Assumption Failures in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for a Simple Motor Task , 1998, NeuroImage.

[34]  Lars Kai Hansen,et al.  Measuring Activation Pattern Reproducibility Using Resampling Techniques , 1998 .

[35]  F. Å. Nielsen,et al.  Canonical Ridge Analysis with Ridge Parameter Optimization , 1998, NeuroImage.

[36]  Patrick L. Purdon,et al.  fMRI Noise Variability Across Subjects and Trials: Insights For Noise Estimation Methods , 1998, NeuroImage.

[37]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Automated image registration: I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[38]  Signal Processing in fMRI: Noise Estimation with Regularization and Hemodynamic Response Modeling , 1998, NeuroImage.

[39]  M. Daube-Witherspoon,et al.  Quantitative functional brain imaging with positron emission tomography , 1998 .

[40]  Stephen C. Strother,et al.  A symbolic environment for visualizing activated foci in functional neuroimaging datasets , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[41]  L. K. Hansen,et al.  Plurality and Resemblance in fMRI Data Analysis , 1999, NeuroImage.