ON USING RESIDUAL DIFFERENCE SCORES IN THE MEASUREMENT OF CONGRUENCE: THE CASE OF MET EXPECTATIONS RESEARCH

Despite meta-analytic support for the met expectations hypothesis, Irving and Meyer (1994, 1995) suggested that methodological problems such as the use of difference scores and retrospective measures of met expectations have resulted in an overstatement of this support. In a recent article, Hom, Griffeth, Palich, and Bracker (1998) simultaneously tested several potential psychological mediating mechanisms of realistic job preview (RJP) effects. These authors suggested that met expectations is a critical mediating mechanism, having direct effects on job satisfaction and indirect effects on organizational commitment, withdrawal cognitions, and actual turnover through job satisfaction and other mediating mechanisms such as coping efficacy and perceived employer honesty. However, they used “residual gain scores” to measure met expectations. In this article, we demonstrate that the use of residual scores for the purposes of operationalizing met expectations creates the same problemsas does the use of difference scores a technique that has been widely criticized in the literature.

[1]  P. Irving,et al.  Reexamination of the met-expectations hypothesis: A longitudinal analysis. , 1994 .

[2]  G. Johns.  Difference score measures of organizational behavior variables: A critique. , 1981 .

[3]  David Rogosa,et al.  A growth curve approach to the measurement of change. , 1982 .

[4]  James A. Breaugh,et al.  Realistic Job Previews: A Critical Appraisal and Future Research Directions , 1983 .

[5]  John B. Willett,et al.  Understanding correlates of change by modeling individual differences in growth , 1985 .

[6]  Jeffrey R. Edwards,et al.  On the Use of Polynomial Regression Equations As An Alternative to Difference Scores in Organizational Research , 1993 .

[7]  Jeffrey R. Edwards,et al.  Regression Analysis as an Alternative to Difference Scores , 1994 .

[8]  John Tisak,et al.  Defending and Extending Difference Score Methods , 1994 .

[9]  L. Palich,et al.  AN EXPLORATORY INVESTIGATION INTO THEORETICAL MECHANISMS UNDERLYING REALISTIC JOB PREVIEWS , 1998 .

[10]  John P. Meyer,et al.  On Using Direct Measures of Met Expectations: A Methodological Note , 1995 .

[11]  J. Edwards.  The Study of Congruence in Organizational Behavior Research: Critique and a Proposed Alternative , 1994 .

[12]  L. Cronbach,et al.  How we should measure "change": Or should we? , 1970 .

[13]  C. Cooper,et al.  The person-environment fit approach to stress: Recurring problems and some suggested solutions , 1990 .

[14]  Empirical Estimates of the Validity of Four Measures of Change , 1984 .

[15]  Richard M. Steers,et al.  Organizational, work, and personal factors in employee turnover and absenteeism. , 1973 .

[16]  J. P. Wanous,et al.  The effects of met expectations on newcomer attitudes and behaviors: a review and meta-analysis. , 1992, The Journal of applied psychology.

[17]  Philip J. Manhardt.  JOB ORIENTATION OF MALE AND FEMALE COLLEGE GRADUATES IN BUSINESS , 1972 .

[18]  John P. Wanous,et al.  Organizational entry: Newcomers moving from outside to inside. , 1977 .