Critical Time Course of Right Frontoparietal Involvement in Mental Number Space

Neuropsychological, neurophysiological, and neuroimaging studies suggest that right frontoparietal circuits may be necessary for the processing of mental number space, also known as the mental number line (MNL). Here we sought to specify the critical time course of three nodes that have previously been related to MNL processing: right posterior parietal cortex (rPPC), right FEF (rFEF), and right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG). The effects of single-pulse TMS delivered at 120% distance-adjusted individual motor threshold were investigated in 21 participants, within a window of 0–400 msec (sampling interval = 33 msec) from the onset of a central digit (1–9, 5 excluded). Pulses were delivered in a random order and with equal probability at each time point, intermixed with noTMS trials. To analyze whether and when TMS interfered with MNL processing, we fitted bimodal Gaussian functions to the observed data and measured effects on changes in the Spatial–Numerical Association of Response Codes (SNARC) effect (i.e., an advantage for left- over right-key responses to small numbers and right- over left-key responses to large numbers) and in overall performance efficiency. We found that, during magnitude judgment with unimanual key-press responses, TMS reduced the SNARC effect in the earlier period of the fitted functions (∼25–60 msec) when delivered over rFEF (small and large numbers) and rIFG (small numbers); TMS further reduced the SNARC effect for small numbers in a later period when delivered to rFEF (∼200 msec). In contrast, TMS of rPPC did not interfere with the SNARC effect but generally reduced performance for small numbers and enhanced it for large numbers, thus producing a pattern reminiscent of “neglect” in mental number space. Our results confirm the causal role of an intact right frontoparietal network in the processing of mental number space. They also indicate that rPPC is specifically tied to explicit number magnitude processing and that rFEF and rIFG contribute to interfacing mental visuospatial codes with lateralized response codes. Overall, our findings suggest that both ventral and dorsal frontoparietal circuits are causally involved and functionally connected in the mapping of numbers to space.

[1]  S. Dehaene,et al.  THREE PARIETAL CIRCUITS FOR NUMBER PROCESSING , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[2]  C Caltagirone,et al.  Overestimation of numerical distances in the left side of space , 2004, Neurology.

[3]  Christopher D. Chambers,et al.  Is delayed foveal feedback critical for extra-foveal perception? , 2013, Cortex.

[4]  Elena Rusconi,et al.  A brain for numbers , 2009, Cortex.

[5]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  The spatial representation of numbers: evidence from neglect and pseudoneglect , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Representation of number in the brain. , 2009, Annual review of neuroscience.

[7]  S. Della Sala,et al.  Representational Pseudoneglect: A Review , 2014, Neuropsychology Review.

[8]  D. Wilkin,et al.  Neuron , 2001, Brain Research.

[9]  W. Gevers,et al.  The SNARC effect does not imply a mental number line , 2008, Cognition.

[10]  A Pooresmaeili,et al.  Time course of attentional modulation in the frontal eye field during curve tracing. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  Elena Rusconi,et al.  Unimanual SNARC Effect: Hand Matters , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[12]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Dexterity with numbers: rTMS over left angular gyrus disrupts finger gnosis and number processing , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  Silke M. Göbel,et al.  Parietal rTMS distorts the mental number line: Simulating ‘spatial’ neglect in healthy subjects , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  The role of area 17 in visual imagery: convergent evidence from PET and rTMS. , 1999, Science.

[15]  K. Priftis,et al.  Brain damage: Neglect disrupts the mental number line , 2002, Nature.

[16]  Guilherme Wood,et al.  On the Cognitive Link between Space and Number: A Meta-Analysis of the SNARC Effect , 2008 .

[17]  M. Corbetta,et al.  The Reorienting System of the Human Brain: From Environment to Theory of Mind , 2008, Neuron.

[18]  M. H. Fischer,et al.  The Future for Snarc Could Be Stark… , 2006, Cortex.

[19]  Samuel Shaki,et al.  Spatial Associations in Numerical Cognition—From Single Digits to Arithmetic , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  E. Bisiach,et al.  1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere ameliorates contralesional visuospatial neglect in humans , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[21]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Topographical Layout of Hand, Eye, Calculation, and Language-Related Areas in the Human Parietal Lobe , 2002, Neuron.

[22]  R. Rosenthal Meta-analytic procedures for social research , 1984 .

[23]  Giuseppe Vallar,et al.  Visualizing numbers in the mind's eye: The role of visuo-spatial processes in numerical abilities , 2008, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[24]  C. Umilta,et al.  The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience: A new synthesis of methodological issues , 2011, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[25]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  The mental number line modulates visual cortical excitability , 2009, Neuroscience Letters.

[26]  Chi-Hung Juan,et al.  Human frontal eye fields and visual search. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Adam N Mamelak,et al.  Spatial selectivity in human ventrolateral prefrontal cortex , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  C. Weiller,et al.  Structural connectivity for visuospatial attention: significance of ventral pathways. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[29]  Matthew F. S. Rushworth,et al.  The Mental Number Line and the Human Angular Gyrus , 2001, NeuroImage.

[30]  Wim Fias,et al.  Spatial representation of number , 2014 .

[31]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Non-spatially lateralized mechanisms in hemispatial neglect , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[32]  Neil G. Muggleton,et al.  Timing of Target Discrimination in Human Frontal Eye Fields , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[34]  James T. Townsend,et al.  The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes , 1983 .

[35]  Andreas Nieder,et al.  A parieto-frontal network for visual numerical information in the monkey. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. , 2000, Annual review of neuroscience.

[37]  Samuel Shaki,et al.  The role of parity, physical size, and magnitude in numerical cognition: The SNARC effect revisited , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[38]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[39]  A. Sack,et al.  The cross-functional role of frontoparietal regions in cognition: internal attention as the overarching mechanism , 2014, Progress in Neurobiology.

[40]  Giovanni Galfano,et al.  Number magnitude orients attention, but not against one’s will , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[41]  E. Bisiach,et al.  Unilateral Neglect of Representational Space , 1978, Cortex.

[42]  Vincent Walsh A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[43]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[44]  Jamie I. D. Campbell Handbook of mathematical cognition , 2004 .

[45]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Foundational numerical capacities and the origins of dyscalculia , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  Daniela Mapelli,et al.  The SNARC effect: an instance of the Simon effect? , 2003, Cognition.

[47]  Paola Guariglia,et al.  Dissociation between physical and mental number line bisection in right hemisphere brain damage , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[48]  D. Ansari Effects of development and enculturation on number representation in the brain , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[49]  Jacques Jonas,et al.  Distortion of time interval reproduction in an epileptic patient with a focal lesion in the right anterior insular/inferior frontal cortices , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[50]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Neurodisruption of selective attention: insights and implications , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[51]  T. Paus,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Human Frontal Eye Field: Effects on Visual Perception and Attention , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[52]  C. Umilta,et al.  Two orienting mechanisms in posterior parietal lobule: An rTMS study of the Simon and SNARC effects , 2007, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[53]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Neural foundations of imagery , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[54]  Jason B. Mattingley,et al.  Distance-adjusted motor threshold for transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[55]  J. Duncan,et al.  Competitive brain activity in visual attention , 1997, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[56]  Sven Bestmann,et al.  Concurrent TMS–fMRI reveals dynamic interhemispheric influences of the right parietal cortex during exogenously cued visuospatial attention , 2011, The European journal of neuroscience.

[57]  J. L. Myers,et al.  Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[58]  Valérie Goffaux,et al.  Shifts of spatial attention cued by irrelevant numbers: Electrophysiological evidence from a target discrimination task , 2015 .

[59]  A. Pascual-Leone,et al.  The role of the angular gyrus in the modulation of visuospatial attention by the mental number line , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[60]  S C Rao,et al.  Integration of what and where in the primate prefrontal cortex. , 1997, Science.

[61]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Contribution of frontal cortex to the spatial representation of number , 2011, Cortex.

[62]  Wim Fias,et al.  Verbal-spatial and visuospatial coding of number-space interactions. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[63]  Luigi Cattaneo,et al.  Numbers within Our Hands: Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability of Hand Muscles during Numerical Judgment , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[64]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Interaction of Stimulus-Driven Reorienting and Expectation in Ventral and Dorsal Frontoparietal and Basal Ganglia-Cortical Networks , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[65]  Gianluca Campana,et al.  Cortical interactions in vision and awareness: hierarchies in reverse. , 2004, Progress in brain research.

[66]  A. Osman,et al.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.

[67]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Spontaneous neuronal activity distinguishes human dorsal and ventral attention systems. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[68]  Wim Fias,et al.  Numbers and space: a computational model of the SNARC effect. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[69]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  Asymmetry of Anticipatory Activity in Visual Cortex Predicts the Locus of Attention and Perception , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[70]  O. Tzeng,et al.  Segregation of visual selection and saccades in human frontal eye fields. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[71]  M. Zorzi,et al.  A computational model of the Simon effect , 1995, Psychological research.

[72]  Shabtai Barash,et al.  Paradoxical activities: insight into the relationship of parietal and prefrontal cortices , 2003, Trends in Neurosciences.

[73]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[74]  Ryota Kanai,et al.  TMS of the FEF Interferes with Spatial Conflict , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[75]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced 'virtual lesions' of human parietal cortex , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[76]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Fast and slow parietal pathways mediate spatial attention , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[77]  Tracy R. Henderson,et al.  Simple metric for scaling motor threshold based on scalp-cortex distance: application to studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[78]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Spatial neglect and attention networks. , 2011, Annual review of neuroscience.

[79]  Denis Schluppeck,et al.  Temporal characteristics of global motion processing revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[80]  Demis Basso,et al.  Motion on Numbers: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on the Ventral Intraparietal Sulcus Alters Both Numerical and Motion Processes , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.