Psychophysics of reading—XVI. The visual span in normal and low vision

The visual span in reading is the number of characters that can be recognized at a glance. The shrinking visual span hypothesis attributes reading deficits in low vision, and slow reading in normal vision at low contrast, to a reduction in the visual span. This hypothesis predicts that reading time (msec/word) becomes increasingly dependent on word length as text contrast decreases. We tested and confirmed this prediction using the rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) method. Estimates of the visual span ranged from about 10 characters for high-contrast text to less than two characters for low-contrast text. Eye-movement recordings showed that longer reading times at low contrast are partitioned about equally between prolonged fixation times and an increased number of saccades (presumably related to a reduced visual span). RSVP measurements for six out of seven low-vision subjects revealed a strong dependence of reading time on word length, as expected from reduced visual spans.

[1]  Raymond Klein,et al.  Letter identification declines with increasing retinal eccentricity at the same rate for normal and dyslexic readers , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  GORDON E. LEGGE,et al.  Psychophysics of Reading. VIII. The Minnesota Low- Vision Reading Test , 1989, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[3]  I L Bailey,et al.  Reading and eye movements in age-related maculopathy. , 1995, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[4]  E Peli,et al.  Scrolled and rapid serial visual presentation texts are read at similar rates by the visually impaired. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[5]  Gary S. Rubin,et al.  Reading without saccadic eye movements , 1992, Vision Research.

[6]  G. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading. VI—The role of contrast in low vision , 1989, Vision Research.

[7]  K Rayner,et al.  Reading without a fovea. , 1979, Science.

[8]  Arthur M. Jacobs,et al.  The effect of visibility on eye-movement parameters in reading , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  G E Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading. Clinical predictors of low-vision reading speed. , 1992, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  G. McConkie,et al.  What guides a reader's eye movements? , 1976, Vision Research.

[11]  J. Lettvin,et al.  Dyslexic children learn a new visual strategy for reading: a controlled experiment , 1994, Vision Research.

[12]  Gary S. Rubin,et al.  Low vision reading with sequential word presentation , 1994, Vision Research.

[13]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—V. The role of contrast in normal vision , 1987, Vision Research.

[14]  G. McConkie,et al.  The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading , 1975 .

[15]  J. O'Regan.  Eye movements and reading. , 1990, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[16]  E. McGinnies,et al.  Visual-recognition thresholds as a function of word length and word frequency. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  Reading twisted text: Implications for the role of saccades , 1987, Vision Research.

[18]  G E Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading. XI. Comparing color contrast and luminance contrast. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[19]  G. Legge,et al.  Mr. Chips: An ideal-observer model of reading , 1997 .

[20]  Martha J. Farah.  Pure alexia as a visual impairment: A reconsideration , 1995 .

[21]  J. May,et al.  The effects of spatial filtering and contrast reduction on visual search times in good and poor readers , 1995, Vision Research.

[22]  John B. Carroll,et al.  The American Heritage Word Frequency Book , 1971 .

[23]  J. K. O'Regan,et al.  Understanding visual search and reading using the concepts of stimulus 'grain'' , 1991 .

[24]  Eileen Kowler.  Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes. , 1990, Reviews of oculomotor research.