The global epidemiology of Caesarean Sections: major increases and wide disparities
暂无分享,去创建一个
F. Barros | A. Barros | T. Boerma | L. Say | C. Ronsmans | Dessalegn Y. Melesse | M. Temmerman | Liang Juan | A. Moller | A. Hosseinpoor | Mu Yi | Dácio de Lyra Rabello Neto | D. Melesse | Ann-Beth Moller
[1] Kenneth R. Bischof,et al. Perioperative patient outcomes in the African Surgical Outcomes Study: a 7-day prospective observational cohort study. , 2018, Lancet.
[2] R. Scherpbier,et al. Relaxation of the one child policy and trends in caesarean section rates and birth outcomes in China between 2012 and 2016: observational study of nearly seven million health facility births , 2018, British Medical Journal.
[3] A. Barros,et al. Within country inequalities in caesarean section rates: observational study of 72 low and middle income countries , 2018, British Medical Journal.
[4] D. Goodman,et al. Caesarean sections and for-profit status of hospitals: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2017, BMJ Open.
[5] Jun Zhang,et al. The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014 , 2016, PloS one.
[6] Stuart R Lipsitz,et al. Relationship Between Cesarean Delivery Rate and Maternal and Neonatal Mortality. , 2015, JAMA.
[7] R. Mikolajczyk,et al. WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates , 2015, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.
[8] R. Mikolajczyk,et al. What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies , 2015, Reproductive Health.
[9] Jun Zhang,et al. Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys. , 2015, The Lancet. Global health.
[10] J. Martin,et al. Trends in low-risk cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990-2013. , 2014, National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System.
[11] Jun Zhang,et al. Searching for the optimal rate of medically necessary cesarean delivery. , 2014, Birth.
[12] C. Stanton,et al. Measuring Coverage in MNCH: Validating Women’s Self-Report of Emergency Cesarean Sections in Ghana and the Dominican Republic , 2013, PloS one.
[13] Yan Guo,et al. Measuring Coverage in MNCH: A Validation Study Linking Population Survey Derived Coverage to Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health Care Records in Rural China , 2013, PloS one.
[14] F. Stanley,et al. Role of public and private funding in the rising caesarean section rate: a cohort study , 2013, BMJ Open.
[15] M. Robson,et al. Methods of achieving and maintaining an appropriate caesarean section rate. , 2013, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.
[16] H. Dahlen,et al. Rates of obstetric intervention among low-risk women giving birth in private and public hospitals in NSW: a population-based descriptive study , 2012, BMJ Open.
[17] F. Barros,et al. Patterns of deliveries in a Brazilian birth cohort: almost universal cesarean sections for the better-off. , 2011, Revista de saude publica.
[18] C. Ronsmans,et al. Reliability of data on caesarean sections in developing countries. , 2005, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.
[19] Victor R. Preedy,et al. United Nations Population Division , 2010 .