Evaluating an Expectation-Driven Question-Under-Discussion Model of Discourse Interpretation

According to Question-Under-Discussion (QUD) models of discourse interpretation, clauses cohere with the preceding context by virtue of providing answers to (usually implicit) questions that are situated within a speaker's goal-driven strategy of inquiry. In this article we present four experiments that examine the predictions of a QUD model of interpretation when cast in terms of an integrated, expectation-driven model of discourse processing. The results of these studies together support the predictions of the model, demonstrating that contextual cues affect comprehenders' expectations about ensuing QUDs (Experiment 1), QUD expectations in turn influence the interpretation of discourse-dependent linguistic expressions (Experiment 2), and the biases associated with those expressions in turn influence the anticipation of QUDs (Experiments 3a and b).

[1]  A. Kehler On QUD-based licensing of strict and sloppy ambiguities , 2016 .

[2]  Oliver Bott,et al.  From Verbs to Discourse: A Novel Account of Implicit Causality , 2014 .

[3]  Barbara J. Grosz,et al.  Pronouns, Names, and the Centering of Attention in Discourse , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[4]  Barbara H. Partee,et al.  Context-Dependence in the Analysis of Linguistic Meaning , 2002 .

[5]  Mark Steedman,et al.  On not being led up the garden path : The use of context by the psychological syntax processor , 1985 .

[6]  H. Rohde Coherence-driven effects in sentence and discourse processing , 2008 .

[7]  Roger P. G. van Gompel,et al.  Choosing anaphoric expressions : do people take into account likelihood of reference? , 2010 .

[8]  A. Agresti Categorical data analysis , 1993 .

[9]  R Ratcliff,et al.  Discourse models, pronoun resolution, and the implicit causality of verbs. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  Andrew Kehler Coherence-Driven Constraints on the Placement of Accent , 2005 .

[11]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Comprehension of Anaphoric Pronouns. , 1977 .

[12]  Joshua K. Hartshorne,et al.  Verb argument structure predicts implicit causality: The advantages of finer-grained semantics , 2013 .

[13]  Craige Roberts Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated for-mal theory of pragmatics , 1996 .

[14]  Chris Cummins,et al.  Evoking Context with Contrastive Stress: Effects on Pragmatic Enrichment , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[15]  Scott AnderBois,et al.  Issues and alternatives , 2011 .

[16]  B. Baldwin,et al.  An Essay on Metaphysics , 1941, Nature.

[17]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[18]  P. Gordon,et al.  Pronominalization and discourse coherence, discourse structure and pronoun interpretation , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[19]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[20]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Coherence and Coreference Revisited , 2007, J. Semant..

[21]  J. Elman,et al.  Event Structure and Discourse Coherence Biases in Pronoun Interpretation , 2006 .

[22]  Assertion , 2008, Practices of Reason.

[23]  Maziar Toosarvandani,et al.  Contrast and the structure of discourse , 2014 .

[24]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[25]  A. Almor,et al.  Noun-phrase anaphors and focus: the informational load hypothesis. , 1999, Psychological review.

[26]  Staffan Larsson,et al.  Questions Under Discussion and Dialogue Moves , 1998 .

[27]  D. C. Mitchell,et al.  An Evaluation of Subject-Paced Reading Tasks and Other Methods for Investigating Immediate Processes in Reading 1 , 2018 .

[28]  Craige Roberts,et al.  Information Structure: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics , 2012 .

[29]  Alex Lascarides,et al.  Logics of Conversation , 2005, Studies in natural language processing.

[30]  Rosemary J. Stevenson,et al.  Thematic roles, focus and the representation of events , 1994 .

[31]  G. Gazdar,et al.  Syntax and semantics 9: Pragmatics: Peter Cole, ed., New York: Academic Press. 1978. pp. xii + 340. , 1980 .

[32]  Hannah Rohde,et al.  Grammatical and information-structural influences on pronoun production , 2014 .

[33]  Philip Miller,et al.  VP Ellipsis beyond syntactic identity: the case of nominal antecedents , 2014 .

[34]  Douglas Rohde,et al.  Linger - a flexible platform for language processing experiments , 2003 .

[35]  Lauri Carlson Dialogue Games: An Approach to Discourse Analysis , 1982 .

[36]  Elisabeth Norcliffe,et al.  The core and the periphery: Data-driven perspectives on syntax inspired by Ivan A. Sag , 2013 .

[37]  Joshua K. Hartshorne,et al.  The causes and consequences explicit in verbs , 2015, Language, cognition and neuroscience.

[38]  Geoffrey K. Pullum,et al.  Exophoric VP Ellipsis , 2014 .

[39]  A. Kehler,et al.  Be Bound or Be Disjoint , 2008 .

[40]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Semantic Influences On Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1994 .

[41]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  The Effect of Thematic Roles on Pronoun Use and Frequency of Reference Continuation , 2001 .

[42]  J. Elman,et al.  Pronoun Interpretation as a Side Effect of Discourse Coherence , 2007 .

[43]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Interaction with context during human sentence processing , 1988, Cognition.

[44]  David I. Beaver,et al.  Sense and Sensitivity: How Focus Determines Meaning , 2008 .

[45]  Daniel Büring,et al.  On D-Trees, Beans, And B-Accents , 2003 .

[46]  I. Sag,et al.  Interrogative Investigations , 2001 .

[47]  J. V. Berkum,et al.  On the use of verb-based implicit causality in sentence comprehension : Evidence from self-paced reading and eye tracking , 2006 .

[48]  G. Jonathan,et al.  Dynamics and the Semantics of Dialogue , 1996 .

[49]  Wolfgang Klein,et al.  Referential movement in descriptive and narrative discourse , 1989 .

[50]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Factors influencing assignment of pronoun antecedents , 1975, Cognition.

[51]  J. V. Kuppevelt Discourse structure, topicality and questioning , 1995, Journal of Linguistics.