A method for patterning multiple types of cells by using electrochemical desorption of self-assembled monolayers within microfluidic channels.

This report describes a method for patterning multiple types of adherent cells on the same substrate by electrochemical desorption of self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) in localized areas defined by a microfluidic system. Several groups have previously reported techniques that allow the patterning of two different types of cells. None of these reported techniques, however, could both confine two or more types of cells to specific locations on surfaces without the presence of physical constraints and control the motility of these different types of cells. 4, 5] The technique presented herein will be useful for a number of biological systems, such as in the studies of neuronal development and in the control of tumor growth. Our method employs a commercially available thiol (HS(CH2)11(OCH2CH2)6OH, abbreviated as “EG6”) to form a SAM on the gold surface, which resists adsorption of proteins and adhesion of cells (for convenience, we call this surface the “inert surface”). A poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) stamp with embedded microfluidic channels is used to carry out selective electrochemical desorption of EG6 from the gold substrate (Figure 1). [7] This procedure allows parts of the inert surface to promote the adsorption of proteins and the adhesion of cells (we call this transformation “activation of the inert surface”). Each of these individually addressable microchannels can deliver one type of cell to activated regions of the surface, resulting in a pattern of multiple types of cells on the surface. Because an electrochemical reaction can take place only in areas exposed to microfluidic channels, patterned cells are confined to activated regions, which are defined by these channels upon removal of the stamp that carries the fluidic system. As there is no physical barrier between these cells, there is a free exchange of substances between these different types of cells through the liquid medium. This exchange allows the studies of cell–cell interactions when different types of cells are confined to separate locations on the surface. A second step of electrochemical desorption can “turn on” motility of cells and allow them to move under the influence of each other. We illustrate this approach by patterning two types of cells (NIH 3T3 and Hela cells) in stripes. Fabrication of an inert surface is accomplished by coating a gold-covered glass substrate with EG6. To selectively activate the inert surface, we first coated the inert substrate with a PDMS stamp with embedded microfeatures (see the Supporting Information for its fabrication) to form enclosed microchannels. The features embedded in the PDMS stamp formed the ceilings and vertical walls and the gold substrate formed the floors of the channels; the channels were reversibly sealed. We filled the channels with solutions of the extracellular matrix (ECM) protein fibronectin (100 mgmL 1 in a phosphate-buffered Figure 1. Strategy for patterning different types of cells. a) To obtain “inert” surfaces, we formed SAMs on gold-coated coverslips with EG6. b) A PDMS stamp with an embedded microfluidic system was brought into contact with the substrate, and the channels were filled with solutions of fibronectin. Application of a cathodic potential on the gold substrates desorbed SAMs inside the channels. c)–f) Magnified views of the main functional locations of the channel system. c) Adsorption of proteins inside the microchannels after electrochemical activation of the surface. d) Adhesion of cells on the floors of the channels. e) After the PDMS stamp was peeled off, a pattern of different types of cells was formed. f) A second step of electrochemical desorption enabled cells that were previously confined in patterns to spread across the previously inert surface.

[1]  Ali Khademhosseini,et al.  Layer-by-layer deposition of hyaluronic acid and poly-L-lysine for patterned cell co-cultures. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[2]  G. Wittstock,et al.  Switching on cell adhesion with microelectrodes. , 2006, Angewandte Chemie.

[3]  Milan Mrksich,et al.  Electrochemical desorption of self-assembled monolayers noninvasively releases patterned cells from geometrical confinements. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[4]  M L Yarmush,et al.  Controlling cell interactions by micropatterning in co-cultures: hepatocytes and 3T3 fibroblasts. , 1997, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[5]  Dennis C. Sgroi,et al.  Stromal Fibroblasts Present in Invasive Human Breast Carcinomas Promote Tumor Growth and Angiogenesis through Elevated SDF-1/CXCL12 Secretion , 2005, Cell.

[6]  Chia-Chi Ho,et al.  Biocompatible micropatterning of two different cell types. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[7]  Shuichi Takayama,et al.  Fabrication of reconfigurable protein matrices by cracking , 2005, Nature materials.

[8]  Peter X. Ma,et al.  Scaffolding In Tissue Engineering , 2005 .

[9]  C. S. Chen,et al.  Geometric control of cell life and death. , 1997, Science.

[10]  Matsuhiko Nishizawa,et al.  In situ control of cellular growth and migration on substrates using microelectrodes. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[11]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Soft lithography in biology and biochemistry. , 2001, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[12]  Masayuki Yamato,et al.  Thermally responsive polymer-grafted surfaces facilitate patterned cell seeding and co-culture. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[13]  Albert Folch,et al.  Micropatterns of chemisorbed cell adhesion-repellent films using oxygen plasma etching and elastomeric masks , 2003 .

[14]  George M. Whitesides,et al.  Patterning self-assembled monolayers using microcontact printing: A new technology for biosensors? , 1995 .

[15]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Patterned deposition of cells and proteins onto surfaces by using three-dimensional microfluidic systems. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  M. Toner,et al.  Cellular Micropatterns on Biocompatible Materials , 1998, Biotechnology progress.

[17]  E. Delamarche,et al.  Patterned delivery of immunoglobulins to surfaces using microfluidic networks. , 1997, Science.

[18]  C. Cotman,et al.  A microfluidic culture platform for CNS axonal injury, regeneration and transport , 2005, Nature Methods.

[19]  D E Ingber,et al.  Using microcontact printing to pattern the attachment of mammalian cells to self-assembled monolayers of alkanethiolates on transparent films of gold and silver. , 1997, Experimental cell research.

[20]  M. Mrksich,et al.  Using electroactive substrates to pattern the attachment of two different cell populations , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Matsuhiko Nishizawa,et al.  Microelectrochemical approach to induce local cell adhesion and growth on substrates. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[22]  Zhigang He,et al.  Semaphorin–Neuropilin Interactions Underlying Sympathetic Axon Responses to Class III Semaphorins , 1998, Neuron.

[23]  Jason P. Gleghorn,et al.  A microfluidic biomaterial. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.