e-Government and the Elderly: A Two Country Comparison

This paper first identifies characteristics of aging populations across two countries: the USA and Australia. Government websites of special interest to the elderly are then identified at three levels of government: National, State and Local. A randomsample of these sites is tested for readability. Results show that reading levels of web sites are harder than thoserecommended and that this design flaw occurs across all levels of government and between the two countries. It is arguedthat the simple mistake of making material too hard for the elderly to read inhibits the transformative ability of e-government for this citizen group with special needs.

[1]  Daniela B. Friedman,et al.  A Systematic Review of Readability and Comprehension Instruments Used for Print and Web-Based Cancer Information , 2006, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[2]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  E-government adoption: A cultural comparison , 2008, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[3]  J. Banks,et al.  Retirement, health and relationships of the older population in England: ELSA 2004 (Wave 2) , 2006 .

[4]  J. Nazroo.  Retirement, health and relationships of the older population in England: The 2004 English Longitudinal Study of Ageing , 2006 .

[5]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  A survey of Web-based business models for e-government in the Netherlands , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[6]  T. Volsko,et al.  Readability assessment of internet-based consumer health information. , 2008, Respiratory care.

[7]  Mara Mather,et al.  Aging and cognition. , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[8]  Paul Beynon-Davies,et al.  Older people and internet engagement: Acknowledging social moderators of internet adoption, access and use , 2008, Inf. Technol. People.

[9]  S. Sikström,et al.  Aging cognition: from neuromodulation to representation , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  Sanjeev Sabharwal,et al.  Assessing Readability of Patient Education Materials: Current Role in Orthopaedics , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  M. Falagas,et al.  Readability levels of health pamphlets distributed in hospitals and health centres in Athens, Greece. , 2010, Public health.

[12]  Robin Gauld,et al.  Do they want it? Do they use it? The 'Demand-Side' of e-Government in Australia and New Zealand , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[13]  Björn Niehaves,et al.  What Is the Issue with Internet Acceptance among Elderly Citizens? Theory Development and Policy Recommendations for Inclusive E-Government , 2010, EGOV.

[14]  D. Fesenmaier,et al.  CUNY Academic , 2022 .

[15]  Michael K Paasche-Orlow,et al.  Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  Joseph R. Spiegel,et al.  Readability analysis of patient information on the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery website , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[17]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Realising transformational stage e-government: a UK local authority perspective , 2008, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[18]  Denise C. Park,et al.  The adaptive brain: aging and neurocognitive scaffolding. , 2009, Annual review of psychology.

[19]  David S. Meyer,et al.  A Research Agenda , 1991 .

[20]  Bill Davey,et al.  Capturing the Mature Traveler: Assessing Web First Impressions , 2009 .

[21]  Cynthia Owsley,et al.  Vision Impairment and Eye Care Utilization among Americans 50 and Older , 2010, Current eye research.

[22]  Timothy A. Salthouse,et al.  The aging of working memory. , 1994 .

[23]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Electronic transformation of government in the U.K.: a research agenda , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[24]  J. Cassidy.  The Institute for Fiscal Studies , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  France Bélanger,et al.  The impact of the digital divide on e-government use , 2009, CACM.

[26]  Lemuria Carter,et al.  E-government Diffusion: A Comparison of Adoption Constructs , 2008, AMCIS.