Teaching for Professional Competence: Instructional Practices That Promote Development of Group, Problem-Solving, and Design Skills. ASHE Annual Meeting Paper.

This study compared the effects of personal characteristics and teaching practices in the development of professional competencies by undergraduate engineering students. A survey completed by 480 engineering students gathered information concerning students' personal, academic, and demographic characteristics; characteristics of their current engineering course; and their self-evaluation of progress made in various areas as a result of their current course. Results indicated that self-evaluated gains in group, problem-solving, and design skills were more the result of current teaching practices than the outcome of students' precollege characteristics. Results suggest that gains in professional competencies can be fostered in the classroom by frequent interaction with and feedback from the instructor, frequent opportunities to work collaboratively with peers, and by clear instructions and structure provided by the instructor. No significant differences were found between male and female students. An appendix lists engineering program accreditation criteria. (Contains 62 references.) (DB) ******************************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. ********************************************************************************

[1]  James L. Ratcliff,et al.  Handbook of the Undergraduate Curriculum: A Comprehensive Guide to Purposes, Structures, Practices, and Change , 1996 .

[2]  Zelda F. Gamson.  Collaborative Learning Comes of Age. , 1994 .

[3]  Kristen Jane Leslie.  Sex-Related Differences in Mathematics Achievements of High School Students , 1983 .

[4]  P. Ewell.  Assessment, Accountability and Improvement: Managing the Contradiction. , 1987 .

[5]  B. Nedwek,et al.  Performance indicators and rational management tools: A compatative assessment of projects in North America and Europe , 1994 .

[6]  Kathy E. Ferguson.  The feminist case against bureaucracy , 1984 .

[7]  Clive L. Dym,et al.  Teaching Design to Freshmen: Style and Content , 1994 .

[8]  R. M. Hall,et al.  The Classroom Climate: A Chilly One for Women?. , 1982 .

[9]  Kent M. Black,et al.  An Industry View of Engineering Education , 1994 .

[10]  Sylvia Hurtado.  The Campus Racial Climate: Contexts of Conflict. , 1992 .

[11]  B. Dougherty,et al.  Defining expectations for problem-solving skills , 1996 .

[12]  Wilbert J. McKeachie,et al.  Research on College Teaching: The Historical Background. , 1990 .

[13]  Martin J. Finkelstein,et al.  The New Academic Generation: A Profession in Transformation , 1998 .

[14]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperative learning : increasing college faculty instructional productivity , 1991 .

[15]  Amaury Nora,et al.  College Students’ Perceptions of Prejudice and Discrimination and Their Feelings of Alienation: A Construct Validation Approach 1 , 1994 .

[16]  Opportunities for Improvement: Advice from Consultant-Evaluators on Programs To Assess Student Learning. , 1996 .

[17]  Louis L. Bucciarelli,et al.  An ethnographic perspective on engineering design , 1988 .

[18]  J. Fleming,et al.  Blacks in College: A Comparative Study of Students' Success in Black and in White Institutions. , 1984 .

[19]  Mardy T. Eimers,et al.  Minority and Nonminority Adjustment to College: Differences or Similarities? , 1997 .

[20]  P. Abrami.  Dimensions of Effective College Instruction , 2017 .

[21]  J. S. Stark,et al.  Exploring common ground in liberal and professional education , 1989 .