Brain functional and effective connectivity underlying the information processing speed assessed by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test

&NA; Delayed Information Processing Speed (IPS) often underlies attention deficits and is particularly evident in patients with traumatic brain injury, Parkinson's disease, depression, dementia, and multiple sclerosis. Therefore, it is of interest to determine the brain network that is responsible for such essential cognitive function to understand IPS deficits and to develop effective rehabilitation programs. We assessed brain functional connectivity and effective connectivity during the performance of an adapted version of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test. Using dynamic causal modeling, we focused on obtaining a network model for IPS function in healthy subjects. Sixteen right‐handed volunteers (seven women, age: 29.7 ± 5.0 years) were included in the study after giving written consent for participating. Functional magnetic resonance images were acquired in a 3T scanner. According to our results, two systems interact during the IPS task performance. One is formed by frontoparietal and fronto‐occipital networks, related to the control of goal‐directed (top‐down) selection for stimuli and response, while the second is composed of the temporoparietal and inferior frontal cortices, which are associated with stimulus‐driven attention in the brain. Additionally, the default‐mode network showed a significant correlation with networks positively associated with the task, mainly those related to visual detection and processing, indicating its relevant role in functional integration involving IPS. Therefore, an IPS‐related network was proposed through a methodology that may be useful for future studies considering other cognitive functions and tasks, clinical groups, and longitudinal assessments. Graphical abstract Figure. No caption available.

[1]  C. Wright,et al.  Vascular contributions to cognitive impairment. , 2015, Neurology. Clinical practice.

[2]  Angela M. Uecker,et al.  ALE meta‐analysis: Controlling the false discovery rate and performing statistical contrasts , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[3]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[4]  Juan Carlos Bustamante,et al.  A Symbol Digit Modalities Test version suitable for functional MRI studies , 2009, Neuroscience Letters.

[5]  C. Higginson,et al.  Metamemory and Tested Cognitive Functioning in Multiple Sclerosis , 2001, The Clinical neuropsychologist.

[6]  Zhengrong Liang,et al.  Cognitive performance and MR markers of cerebral injury in cognitively impaired MS patients , 2003, Neurology.

[7]  Hao-Ting Wang,et al.  The role of the default mode network in component processes underlying the wandering mind , 2017, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[8]  C. Polman,et al.  Differences in cognitive impairment of relapsing remitting, secondary, and primary progressive MS , 2004, Neurology.

[9]  Colin Humphries,et al.  Hierarchical organization of speech perception in human auditory cortex , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[10]  Erin L. Meier,et al.  Changes in task-based effective connectivity in language networks following rehabilitation in post-stroke patients with aphasia , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[11]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Sample dependence correction for order selection in fMRI analysis , 2006, 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro, 2006..

[12]  Gereon R. Fink,et al.  Dorsal and Ventral Attention Systems , 2014, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[13]  Analysis of “task-positive” and “task-negative” functional networks during the performance of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test in patients at presentation with clinically isolated syndrome suggestive of multiple sclerosis , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  R. Saxe,et al.  Theory of Mind: A Neural Prediction Problem , 2013, Neuron.

[15]  John Duncan,et al.  The role of the right inferior frontal gyrus: inhibition and attentional control , 2010, NeuroImage.

[16]  H. Strasburger,et al.  Visual perception in space and time--mapping the visual field of temporal resolution. , 2004, Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis.

[17]  S. Rao,et al.  Correlations between MRI and Information Processing Speed in MS: A Meta-Analysis , 2014, Multiple sclerosis international.

[18]  H. Hartung,et al.  Recommendations for a Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS) , 2012, Multiple sclerosis.

[19]  S. Black,et al.  Vascular Contributions to Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association , 2011, Stroke.

[20]  Xingchang Wei,et al.  Posterior fossa lesion volume and slowed information processing in multiple sclerosis. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  Karl J. Friston The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[22]  J. Pekar,et al.  A method for making group inferences from functional MRI data using independent component analysis , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[23]  G. Mangun,et al.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  Jonathan W. Peirce,et al.  PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[25]  Susan L. Whitfield-Gabrieli,et al.  Conn: A Functional Connectivity Toolbox for Correlated and Anticorrelated Brain Networks , 2012, Brain Connect..

[26]  Robert Zivadinov,et al.  Basal ganglia, thalamus and neocortical atrophy predicting slowed cognitive processing in multiple sclerosis , 2011, Journal of Neurology.

[27]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  The role of default network deactivation in cognition and disease , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  R. Detels,et al.  A survey diagnostic tool for senile dementia. , 1981, American journal of epidemiology.

[29]  Josh H McDermott,et al.  Music Perception, Pitch, and the Auditory System This Review Comes from a Themed Issue on Sensory Systems Edited Pitch Relations across Time—relative Pitch Relative Pitch—behavioral Evidence Neural Mechanisms of Relative Pitch Representation of Simultaneous Pitches— Chords and Polyphony Summary and , 2022 .

[30]  Lynn D. Hudson,et al.  Validity of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test as a cognition performance outcome measure for multiple sclerosis , 2017, Multiple sclerosis.

[31]  C. Frith,et al.  Neural Correlates of Attentional Capture in Visual Search , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  An Information-Maximization Approach to Blind Separation and Blind Deconvolution , 1995, Neural Computation.

[33]  C. O'brien The CAGE questionnaire for detection of alcoholism: a remarkably useful but simple tool. , 2008, JAMA.

[34]  Paul J. Laurienti,et al.  Dietary Caffeine Consumption Modulates fMRI Measures , 2002, NeuroImage.

[35]  R. Leoni,et al.  Symbol Digit Modalities Test adaptation for Magnetic Resonance Imaging environment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2018, Multiple sclerosis and related disorders.

[36]  Moors Pieter,et al.  Test-retest reliability. , 2014 .

[37]  Brief mindfulness training alters causal brain connections in mTBI , 2015, BMC Neuroscience.

[38]  P. Caramelli,et al.  Musical training, neuroplasticity and cognition , 2010, Dementia & neuropsychologia.

[39]  F. Barkhof,et al.  Thalamus structure and function determine severity of cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis , 2015, Neurology.

[40]  C. Forn,et al.  Task-load manipulation in the Symbol Digit Modalities Test: An alternative measure of information processing speed , 2013, Brain and Cognition.

[41]  J. Ponsford,et al.  Attentional deficits following closed-head injury. , 1992, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[42]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[43]  S. Folstein,et al.  Neuropsychological and neuroradiological correlates in Huntington's disease. , 1988, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[44]  M. Lezak,et al.  Neuropsychological assessment, 4th ed. , 2004 .

[45]  G. Fink,et al.  Connectivity-based approaches in stroke and recovery of function , 2014, The Lancet Neurology.

[46]  A. Fleisher,et al.  Clinical predictors of progression to Alzheimer disease in amnestic mild cognitive impairment , 2007, Neurology.

[47]  Ilse Lamers,et al.  The Nine-Hole Peg Test as a manual dexterity performance measure for multiple sclerosis , 2017, Multiple sclerosis.

[48]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling for fMRI: A two-state model , 2008, NeuroImage.

[49]  Karl J. Friston Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: A synthesis , 1994 .

[50]  C. Forn,et al.  Exploring Neural Efficiency in Multiple Sclerosis Patients during the Symbol Digit Modalities Test: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2017, Neurodegenerative Diseases.

[51]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Reliability measures of functional magnetic resonance imaging in a longitudinal evaluation of mild cognitive impairment , 2014, NeuroImage.

[52]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  Dynamic intra- and interhemispheric interactions during unilateral and bilateral hand movements assessed with fMRI and DCM , 2008, NeuroImage.

[53]  J. DeLuca,et al.  The role of speed versus working memory in predicting learning new information in multiple sclerosis , 2013, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[54]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Characterizing Stimulus–Response Functions Using Nonlinear Regressors in Parametric fMRI Experiments , 1998, NeuroImage.

[55]  H. Genova,et al.  Cognitive Rehabilitation in Multiple Sclerosis: The Role of Plasticity , 2015, Front. Neurol..

[56]  Peter Kirsch,et al.  Test–retest reliability of evoked BOLD signals from a cognitive–emotive fMRI test battery , 2012, NeuroImage.