A Suspicious Feature of the Popper/Miller Argument
暂无分享,去创建一个
The form of argument used by Popper and Miller to attack the concept of probabilistic induction is applied to the slightly different situation in which some evidence undermines a hypothesis. The result is seemingly absurd, thus bringing the form of argument under suspicion.
[1] Karl R. Popper,et al. Why probabilistic support is not inductive , 1987, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.
[2] K. Popper,et al. A proof of the impossibility of inductive probability , 1983, Nature.