A Suspicious Feature of the Popper/Miller Argument

The form of argument used by Popper and Miller to attack the concept of probabilistic induction is applied to the slightly different situation in which some evidence undermines a hypothesis. The result is seemingly absurd, thus bringing the form of argument under suspicion.

[1]  Karl R. Popper,et al.  Why probabilistic support is not inductive , 1987, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[2]  K. Popper,et al.  A proof of the impossibility of inductive probability , 1983, Nature.