Development of a Field Test Method to Evaluate Gaseous Air Cleaner Performance in a Multizone Building

Abstract The performance of gaseous air cleaners for commercial and residential buildings has typically been evaluated using test protocols developed for a controlled laboratory chamber or a test duct. It is currently unknown how laboratory measurements relate to the actual performance of an air cleaner installed in a real building. However, to date, there are no air cleaner field test protocols available, thereby limiting the existing field data. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has conducted a series of experiments to support test procedure development for evaluating the installed performance of gaseous air cleaning equipment, as well as metrics for characterizing field performance. To date, over 100 experiments have been completed, of which 23 portable air cleaner experiments and 6 in-duct air cleaner experiments are described in this paper. Tests were conducted in a finished three-bedroom/two-bathroom manufactured house equipped with several gas chromatographs to semi-continuously measure air change rates and volatile organic compound concentrations. Experimental variables included air cleaner location, isolation of zones by closing doors, and contaminant source location. For each experiment, air cleaner removal of decane was directly measured using the air cleaner inlet and outlet concentrations, as well as with mass balance analyses using measured room concentrations. With a verified mass balance model, a field performance metric was developed to compare installed whole-building performance to the performance predicted by a laboratory result. The results provide insight into the protocols and metrics that might prove useful for characterizing the field performance of air cleaners as well as the impact of air cleaner removal on zonal concentration levels in a variety of situations.

[1]  W W Nazaroff,et al.  Effectiveness of in-room air filtration and dilution ventilation for tuberculosis infection control. , 1996, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[2]  A. Persily,et al.  VENTILATION CHARACTERIZATION OF A NEW MANUFACTURED HOUSE , 2003 .

[3]  D. M. Sander,et al.  Validation of the surface sink model for sorptive interactions between VOCs and indoor materials , 2001 .

[4]  William J. Fisk,et al.  Ventilation efficiencies of task/ambient conditioning systems with desk-mounted air supplies , 1999 .

[5]  W. Fisk,et al.  Ventilation efficiencies of desk-mounted task/ambient conditioning systems. , 1999, Indoor air.

[6]  Determining Air Change in a Single Zone by Means of a Tracer Gas Dilution , 2009 .

[7]  Wenhao Chen,et al.  Performance of air cleaners for removing multiple volatile organic compounds in indoor air , 2005 .

[8]  H. E. Burroughs Filtration and Building Security , 2005 .

[9]  W. Nazaroff,et al.  Effectiveness of In-Room Air Filtration and Dilution Ventilation for Tuberculosis Infection Control. , 1996, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[10]  Guk-Rwang Won American Society for Testing and Materials , 1987 .

[11]  Paolo Maria Tronville,et al.  Global Standards for Filter Testing , 2006 .

[12]  J. Siegel,et al.  Modeling Filter Bypass: Impact on Filter Efficiency , 2004 .

[13]  Andrew K. Persily,et al.  Air Change Effectiveness Measurements in Two Modern Office Buildings , 1994 .

[14]  William W. Nazaroff,et al.  Nonlinear Least‐Squares Minimization Applied to Tracer Gas Decay for Determining Airflow Rates in a Two‐Zone Building , 1997 .

[15]  William J. Fisk Indoor air quality control techniques : radon, formaldehyde, combustion products , 1987 .

[16]  Andrew K. Persily,et al.  Ventilation Characterization of a New Manufactured House | NIST , 2003 .

[17]  Steven J. Nabinger,et al.  Characterizing gaseous air cleaner performance in the field , 2006 .