The Measurement and Treatment of Suppression in Amblyopia

Amblyopia, a developmental disorder of the visual cortex, is one of the leading causes of visual dysfunction in the working age population. Current estimates put the prevalence of amblyopia at approximately 1-3%1-3, the majority of cases being monocular2. Amblyopia is most frequently caused by ocular misalignment (strabismus), blur induced by unequal refractive error (anisometropia), and in some cases by form deprivation. Although amblyopia is initially caused by abnormal visual input in infancy, once established, the visual deficit often remains when normal visual input has been restored using surgery and/or refractive correction. This is because amblyopia is the result of abnormal visual cortex development rather than a problem with the amblyopic eye itself4,5 . Amblyopia is characterized by both monocular and binocular deficits6,7 which include impaired visual acuity and poor or absent stereopsis respectively. The visual dysfunction in amblyopia is often associated with a strong suppression of the inputs from the amblyopic eye under binocular viewing conditions8. Recent work has indicated that suppression may play a central role in both the monocular and binocular deficits associated with amblyopia9,10 . Current clinical tests for suppression tend to verify the presence or absence of suppression rather than giving a quantitative measurement of the degree of suppression. Here we describe a technique for measuring amblyopic suppression with a compact, portable device11,12 . The device consists of a laptop computer connected to a pair of virtual reality goggles. The novelty of the technique lies in the way we present visual stimuli to measure suppression. Stimuli are shown to the amblyopic eye at high contrast while the contrast of the stimuli shown to the non-amblyopic eye are varied. Patients perform a simple signal/noise task that allows for a precise measurement of the strength of excitatory binocular interactions. The contrast offset at which neither eye has a performance advantage is a measure of the "balance point" and is a direct measure of suppression. This technique has been validated psychophysically both in control13,14 and patient6,9,11 populations. In addition to measuring suppression this technique also forms the basis of a novel form of treatment to decrease suppression over time and improve binocular and often monocular function in adult patients with amblyopia12,15,16 . This new treatment approach can be deployed either on the goggle system described above or on a specially modified iPod touch device15.

[1]  Robert F Hess,et al.  Quantifying sensory eye dominance in the normal visual system: a new technique and insights into variation across traditional tests. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  Behzad Mansouri,et al.  A Binocular Approach to Treating Amblyopia: Antisuppression Therapy , 2010, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[3]  Tim S. Meese,et al.  Contrast masking in strabismic amblyopia: Attenuation, noise, interocular suppression and binocular summation , 2008, Vision Research.

[4]  B. Mansouri,et al.  Measurement of suprathreshold binocular interactions in amblyopia , 2008, Vision Research.

[5]  Prevalence of amblyopia and strabismus in African American and Hispanic children ages 6 to 72 months the multi-ethnic pediatric eye disease study. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[6]  S. Logan,et al.  Risk, causes, and outcomes of visual impairment after loss of vision in the non-amblyopic eye: a population-based study , 2002, The Lancet.

[7]  Bruce C. Hansen,et al.  The contrast dependence of the cortical fMRI deficit in amblyopia; a selective loss at higher contrasts , 2010, Human brain mapping.

[8]  R. Hess,et al.  Excitatory binocular interactions in two cases of alternating strabismus. , 2011, Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.

[9]  J. Wood,et al.  Amblyopia: prevalence, natural history, functional effects and treatment , 2005, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[10]  Behzad Mansouri,et al.  Cortical deficits in human amblyopia: their regional distribution and their relationship to the contrast detection deficit. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[11]  Peng Zhang,et al.  Binocular Balance in Normal Vision and Its Modulation by Mean Luminance , 2011, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[12]  J V Odom,et al.  Relating binocular and monocular vision in strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia. , 2006, Archives of ophthalmology.

[13]  R. Hess,et al.  A Game Platform for Treatment of Amblyopia , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[14]  Robert F Hess,et al.  The role of suppression in amblyopia. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[15]  R F Hess,et al.  A new binocular approach to the treatment of amblyopia in adults well beyond the critical period of visual development. , 2010, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[16]  Robert F Hess,et al.  A Compact Clinical Instrument for Quantifying Suppression , 2011, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[17]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[18]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[19]  Tien Yin Wong,et al.  Prevalence of refractive error in Singaporean Chinese children: the strabismus, amblyopia, and refractive error in young Singaporean Children (STARS) study. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  鮫島 浩,et al.  Population-based study からみた神経予後不良因子の検討 , 2009 .