Evaluating the European added value of TEN-T projects: a methodological proposal based on spatial spillovers, accessibility and GIS

This paper develops a methodology for calculating the European value added value (EVA) generated by transport infrastructure projects. This approach is particularly useful for evaluating projects in the framework of Trans-European Transport Networks (TEN-T), although it may also be used in trans-national projects in other geographical areas. The methodology is based on the appraisal of spatial spillovers generated by trans-national projects by using accessibility indicators (access to markets) and Geographical Information Systems (GIS). Projects are split into sections and spillover effects of each section are then computed. The sections that produce a high proportion of spillovers in relation to internal benefits generate a high EVA. Additionally, indicators are obtained of the effects of each section in terms of spatial concentration on the different countries affected, efficiency (general improvement in accessibility) and territorial cohesion (reduction in accessibility disparities between regions). The validity of this approach is verified by applying it to TEN-T priority project 25. This methodology does not seek to replace existing project appraisal methodologies (particularly the cost-benefit analysis); rather it provides complementary data for decision-making. Sections which are scarcely profitable from the cost-benefit analysis perspective but which have high European value added should receive more European funding than more profitable sections of markedly national interest.

[1]  Elena López,et al.  Measuring Regional Cohesion Effects of Large-scale Transport Infrastructure Investments: An Accessibility Approach , 2008 .

[2]  David M Dundon-Smith,et al.  The Channel Tunnel and regional economic development , 1994 .

[3]  A. Condeço-Melhorado,et al.  Using accessibility indicators and GIS to assess spatial spillovers of transport infrastructure investment , 2010 .

[4]  W. G. Hansen How Accessibility Shapes Land Use , 1959 .

[5]  Volker Nitsch National borders and international trade: evidence from the European Union , 2000 .

[6]  Shunfeng Song,et al.  Some Tests of Alternative Accessibility Measures: A Population Density Approach , 1996 .

[7]  John Mccallum,et al.  National Borders Matter: Canada-U.S. Regional Trade Patterns , 1995 .

[8]  Piet Rietveld,et al.  The Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Patterns , 2004 .

[9]  A. Pereira,et al.  Spillover effects of public capital formation: evidence from the Spanish regions , 2003 .

[10]  P Rietveld,et al.  The Accessibility of European Cities: Theoretical Framework and Comparison of Approaches , 1998 .

[11]  J. Gutiérrez,et al.  USING ACCESSIBILITY INDICATORS AND GIS TO ASSESS AND MONETARIZE SPATIAL SPILLOVERS OF TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE , 2007 .

[12]  Dimitrios A Tsamboulas,et al.  EU involvement in TEN development: network effects and European value added , 2002 .

[13]  R. Camagni Territorial Impact Assessment for European regions: A methodological proposal and an application to EU transport policy. , 2009, Evaluation and program planning.

[14]  J. Gutiérrez Location, economic potential and daily accessibility: an analysis of the accessibility impact of the high-speed line Madrid–Barcelona–French border , 2001 .

[15]  Richard D. Knowles,et al.  Barrier effects of international borders on fixed link traffic generation: the case of Øresundsbron , 2009 .

[16]  James Laird,et al.  Network Effects and Total Economic Impact in Transport Appraisal , 2005 .

[17]  J. M. Morris,et al.  Accessibility indicators for transport planning , 1979 .

[18]  A. Monzón,et al.  Assessment of Cross‐Border Spillover Effects of National Transport Infrastructure Plans: An Accessibility Approach , 2009 .

[19]  Susan Grant-Muller,et al.  Economic appraisal of European transport projects: The state-of-the-art revisited , 2001 .

[20]  J. G. Koenig,et al.  Indicators of urban accessibility: Theory and application , 1980 .

[21]  Bert van Wee,et al.  Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions , 2004 .

[22]  Natalie Chen,et al.  Intra-National Versus International Trade in the European Union: Why Do National Borders Matter? , 2002 .

[23]  Gordon Pirie,et al.  Measuring Accessibility: A Review and Proposal , 1979 .

[24]  David Banister,et al.  Transport investment and the promotion of economic growth , 2001 .

[25]  Alan M. Hay,et al.  Concepts of equity, fairness and justice in geographical studies , 1995 .

[26]  B J Linneker,et al.  Accessibility Measures Compared in an Analysis of the Impact of the M25 London Orbital Motorway on Britain , 1992 .

[27]  M. Kwan Space-time and integral measures of individual accessibility: a comparative analysis using a point-based framework , 2010 .