Electrotactile adaptation on the abdomen: preliminary results.

Electrotactile (electrocutaneous) stimulation at currents greater than sensation threshold causes sensory adaptation, which temporarily raises the sensation threshold and reduces the perceived magnitude of stimulation. After 15 min of moderately intense exposure to a conditioning stimulus (10 s on, 10 s off), the sensation threshold elevation for seven observers was 60-270%, depending on the current, frequency, and number of pulses in the burst structure of the conditioning stimulus. Increases in any of these parameters increased the sensation threshold elevation. Adaptation and recovery were each complete in approximately 15 min.

[1]  G A Gescheider,et al.  Effects of vibrotactile adaptation on the perception of stimuli of varied intensity. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  Kurt A. Kaczmarek Optimal electrotactile stimulation waveforms for human information display , 1991 .

[3]  B. Berglund,et al.  Adaptation and Recovery in Vibrotactile Perception , 1970, Perceptual and motor skills.

[4]  C A Phillips,et al.  Sensory feedback control of upper- and lower-extremity motor prostheses. , 1988, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[5]  W. T. Peake,et al.  Experiments in Hearing , 1963 .

[6]  F A Saunders Information transmission across the skin: high-resolution tactile sensory aids for the deaf and the blind. , 1983, The International journal of neuroscience.

[7]  Carter C. Collins,et al.  On Mobility Aids for the Blind , 1985 .

[8]  J. Webster,et al.  A 16-channel 8-parameter waveform electrotactile stimulation system , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  M. Rowe,et al.  Neural mechanisms in vibrotactile adaptation. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Carl E. Sherrick,et al.  Basic and applied research on tactile aids for deaf people: Progress and prospects , 1984 .

[11]  A.Y.J. Szeto,et al.  Technological devices for deaf-blind children: needs and potential impact , 1988, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[12]  K. Kaczmarek Sensory Augmentation and Substitution , 1999 .

[13]  J. Phillips,et al.  Neural mechanisms of scanned and stationary touch. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  B L Whitsel,et al.  Time course and action spectrum of vibrotactile adaptation. , 1990, Somatosensory & motor research.

[15]  M. Hollins,et al.  Vibrotactile adaptation on the face , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  K.A. Kaczmarek,et al.  Electrotactile haptic display on the fingertips: preliminary results , 1994, Proceedings of 16th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[17]  R. T. Verrillo Psychophysics of vibrotactile stimulation. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  G A Gescheider,et al.  Effect of prior stimulation on vibrotactile thresholds. , 1977, Sensory processes.

[19]  U. Lindblom,et al.  The discharge from vibration-sensitive receptors in the monkey foot. , 1966, Experimental neurology.

[20]  Ronald Raymond Riso,et al.  COMPARISON OF SUBDERMAL VERSUS SURFACE ELECTROCUTANEOUS STIMULATION. , 1982 .

[21]  Paul Bach-y-Rita,et al.  Tactile displays , 1995 .

[22]  Carter C. Collins,et al.  Tactile Television - Mechanical and Electrical Image Projection , 1970 .

[23]  G A Gescheider,et al.  Selective adaptation of vibrotactile thresholds. , 1979, Sensory processes.

[24]  Georg v. Békésy,et al.  Synchronism of Neural Discharges and Their Demultiplication in Pitch Perception on the Skin and in Hearing , 1959 .

[25]  P. Bach-y-Rita Brain mechanisms in sensory substitution , 1972 .

[26]  C. H. Rogers Choice of Stimulator Frequency for Tactile Arrays , 1970 .

[27]  G. Békésy,et al.  Experiments in Hearing , 1963 .

[28]  U. Lindblom,et al.  Properties of touch receptors in distal glabrous skin of the monkey. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  J. Hahn Vibrotactile adaptation and recovery measured by two methods. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[30]  Willis J. Tompkins,et al.  Sensory substitution for space gloves and for space robots , 1987 .

[31]  '. B.Vallbo Properties of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the human hand-related to touch sensation , 1999 .

[32]  J. Webster,et al.  Periodic Variations In The Electrotactile Sensation Threshold , 1990, [1990] Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[33]  W.J. Tompkins,et al.  Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[34]  C M Reed,et al.  Research on tactile communication of speech: a review. , 1982, ASHA monographs.

[35]  G A Gescheider,et al.  Effects of sensory adaptation on the form of the psychophysical magnitude function for cutaneous vibration. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[36]  Frank A. Saunders,et al.  Electrocutaneous Stimulation for Sensory Communication in Rehabilitation Engineering , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[37]  C L Van Doren Contours of equal perceived amplitude and equal perceived frequency for electrocutaneous stimuli. , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  M E Tyler,et al.  The afferent neural response to electrotactile stimuli: preliminary results. , 2000, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[39]  J. Webster,et al.  Maximal dynamic range electrotactile stimulation waveforms , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.