FDG-PET/MRI fused data sets for the detection of liver metastases in patients undergoing systemic anticancer treatment

Background: To retrospectively describe imaging characteristics of liver metastases on fused FDG-PET/ MRI data sets and to compare the diagnostic accuracy of MRI and fused FDG-PET/MRI data sets for the detection of liver metastases in patients undergoing systemic anticancer treatment. Materials and Methods: 43 oncological patients (mean age: 56+/- 11 years) were investigated by FDG-PET/CT and liver MRI. FDG-PET data from PET/CT scans were fused with MRI. 556 lesions were evaluated. 5 different evaluation algorithms were used for FDG-PET/ MRI evaluation. The sensitivity, specifity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of MRI and FDG-PET/MRI data for the detection of liver metastases were calculated. A mean follow-up of 647 days served as reference standard. McNemar’s test was used to test for statistically significant differences between MRI and FDG-PET/MRI (p<0.5). Results: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of MRI for the detection of liver metastases were 86%, 81%, 97%, 47%, and 85% and 50%, 100%, 100%, 22%, and 56%, for FDGPET/MRI. FDG-PET/MRI was significantly less accurate than MRI alone (p<.001). Conclusion: In opposite to patients before systemic anticancer therapy the fusion of FDG-PET data with liver MRI cannot be recommended for the detection of liver metastases in patients undergoing systemic oncological therapy. Iran. J. Radiat. Res., 2012; 9(4): 209­219

[1]  M. Forsting,et al.  "One-stop-shop" staging: should we prefer FDG-PET/CT or MRI for the detection of bone metastases? , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[2]  G. V. von Schulthess,et al.  Value of Retrospective Fusion of PET and MR Images in Detection of Hepatic Metastases: Comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT and Gd-EOB-DTPA–Enhanced MRI , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  Katsuhiro Nasu,et al.  Role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the differential diagnosis of focal hepatic lesions. , 2009, World journal of gastroenterology.

[4]  G Antoch,et al.  PET/CT for the staging and follow-up of patients with malignancies. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[5]  Norman E Bolus,et al.  PET/MRI: The Blended-Modality Choice of the Future?* , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

[6]  B. Pichler,et al.  Pre-clinical PET/MR: technological advances and new perspectives in biomedical research , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[7]  A. Figer,et al.  Response to chemotherapy predicts survival following resection of hepatic colo‐rectal metastases in patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy , 2009, Journal of surgical oncology.

[8]  Gerald Antoch,et al.  Combined PET/MRI: a new dimension in whole-body oncology imaging? , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[9]  W. Oyen,et al.  Controversies in the Management of Colorectal Liver Metastases: Role of PET and PET/CT , 2009, Digestive Surgery.

[10]  E. Hauth,et al.  Breast Cancer Staging in a Single Session: Whole-Body PET/CT Mammography , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  T. Beyer,et al.  TNM staging with FDG-PET/CT in patients with primary head and neck cancer , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[12]  M. Choti,et al.  Efficacy of Preoperative Combined 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography for Assessing Primary Rectal Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy , 2007, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[13]  S. Zincirkeser,et al.  Standardized Uptake Values of Normal Organs on 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography Imaging , 2007, The Journal of international medical research.

[14]  D. Rubello,et al.  Utility of 18F-FDG PET and contrast-enhanced CT scan in the assessment of residual liver metastasis from colorectal cancer following adjuvant chemotherapy. , 2007, Nuclear medicine review. Central & Eastern Europe.

[15]  T. Beyer,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of colorectal cancer staging with whole-body PET/CT colonography. , 2006, JAMA.

[16]  T. Beyer,et al.  Putting ‘clear’ into nuclear medicine: a decade of PET/CT development , 2006, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[17]  E. Rummeny,et al.  Assessment of the extent of metastases of gastrointestinal carcinoid tumors using whole-body PET, CT, MRI, PET/CT and PET/MRI. , 2006, European journal of medical research.

[18]  A. Zwinderman,et al.  Colorectal liver metastases: CT, MR imaging, and PET for diagnosis--meta-analysis. , 2005, Radiology.

[19]  G. Antoch,et al.  [Whole-body tumor staging: MRI or FDG-PET/CT?]. , 2004, Der Radiologe.

[20]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  Dual-modality PET/CT scanning with negative oral contrast agent to avoid artifacts: introduction and evaluation. , 2004, Radiology.

[21]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  PET/CT molecular imaging in abdominal oncology , 2004, Abdominal Imaging.

[22]  J. Debatin,et al.  Whole-body dual-modality PET/CT and whole-body MRI for tumor staging in oncology. , 2003, JAMA.

[23]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  Non-small cell lung cancer: dual-modality PET/CT in preoperative staging. , 2003, Radiology.

[24]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  Dual-modality PET/CT imaging: the effect of respiratory motion on combined image quality in clinical oncology , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[25]  C. Compton,et al.  AJCC Cancer Staging Manual , 2002, Springer New York.

[26]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  A combined PET/CT scanner for clinical oncology. , 2000, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[27]  K. Miles,et al.  Hepatic metastases: the value of quantitative assessment of contrast enhancement on computed tomography. , 1999, European journal of radiology.

[28]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.