Explaining human multiple object tracking as resource-constrained approximate inference in a dynamic probabilistic model

Multiple object tracking is a task commonly used to investigate the architecture of human visual attention. Human participants show a distinctive pattern of successes and failures in tracking experiments that is often attributed to limits on an object system, a tracking module, or other specialized cognitive structures. Here we use a computational analysis of the task of object tracking to ask which human failures arise from cognitive limitations and which are consequences of inevitable perceptual uncertainty in the tracking task. We find that many human performance phenomena, measured through novel behavioral experiments, are naturally produced by the operation of our ideal observer model (a Rao-Blackwelized particle filter). The tradeoff between the speed and number of objects being tracked, however, can only arise from the allocation of a flexible cognitive resource, which can be formalized as either memory or attention.

[1]  Erik Blaser,et al.  Tracking an object through feature space , 2000, Nature.

[2]  MARISA CARRASCO,et al.  Cortical Magnification Neutralizes the Eccentricity Effect in Visual Search , 1997, Vision Research.

[3]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Individuation of visual objects over time , 2006, Cognition.

[4]  S. Tripathy,et al.  Severe loss of positional information when detecting deviations in multiple trajectories. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[5]  O. Braddick,et al.  The temporal integration and resolution of velocity signals , 1991, Vision Research.

[6]  D. Spalding The Principles of Psychology , 1873, Nature.

[7]  Fredrik Gustafsson,et al.  Particle filters for positioning, navigation, and tracking , 2002, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[8]  David E. Fencsik,et al.  Velocity cues improve visual search and multiple object tracking , 2005 .

[9]  Brian D. Fisher,et al.  Evidence against a speed limit in multiple-object tracking , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  Detecting and predicting changes , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  Z. Pylyshyn,et al.  Is motion extrapolation employed in multiple object tracking? Tracking as a low-level, non-predictive function , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  Modeling the effects of memory on human online sentence processing with particle filters , 2008, NIPS.

[13]  Yuhong Jiang,et al.  Feature binding in attentive tracking of distinct objects , 2009, Visual cognition.

[14]  Paul M Bays,et al.  Dynamic Shifts of Limited Working Memory Resources in Human Vision , 2008, Science.

[15]  T. Başar,et al.  A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems , 2001 .

[16]  Z W Pylyshyn,et al.  Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[17]  Nando de Freitas,et al.  Rao-Blackwellised Particle Filtering for Dynamic Bayesian Networks , 2000, UAI.

[18]  George A. Alvarez,et al.  How many objects can you attentively track?: Evidence for a resource-limited tracking mechanism , 2007 .

[19]  R. Streit,et al.  Probabilistic Multi-Hypothesis Tracking , 1995 .