A hybrid DEA-MOLP model for public school assessment and closure decision in the City of Philadelphia

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is generally used to evaluate past performance and multi objective linear programming (MOLP) is often used to plan for future performance goals. In this study, we establish an equivalence relationship between MOLP problems and combined-oriented DEA models using a direction distance function designed to account for desirable and undesirable inputs and outputs together with uncontrollable variables. This equivalence model can be effectively used to support interactive processes and performance measures designed to establish future performance goals while taking into account the preferences of decision makers (DMs). In particular, it allows DMs to consider different efficiency improvement strategies when subject to budgetary restrictions. The applicability of the proposed method and the efficacy of the procedures and algorithms are demonstrated using a case study where the performance of high schools in the City of Philadelphia is evaluated.

[1]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  Data envelopment analysis in the public sector , 2014 .

[2]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[3]  Francisco Pedraja-Chaparro,et al.  On the Role of Weight Restrictions in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1997 .

[4]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Integrating DEA-oriented performance assessment and target setting using interactive MOLP methods , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  H. O. Fried,et al.  Accounting for Environmental Effects and Statistical Noise in Data Envelopment Analysis , 2002 .

[6]  Mette Asmild,et al.  Measuring overall efficiency and effectiveness using DEA , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Toyokazu Nose,et al.  A new approach to environmental-performance evaluation , 2006 .

[8]  Giuseppe Grossi,et al.  Appropriateness and Use of Performance Information in the Budgeting Process: Some Experiences from German and Italian Municipalities , 2016 .

[9]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Integrated efficiency and trade-off analyses using a DEA-oriented interactive minimax reference point approach , 2012, Comput. Oper. Res..

[10]  Pekka J. Korhonen,et al.  Restricting weights in value efficiency analysis , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Wen-Min Lu,et al.  A closer look at the economic-environmental disparities for regional development in China , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  R. Dyson,et al.  Reducing Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1988 .

[13]  Yan Luo,et al.  Resource allocation and target setting for parallel production system based on DEA , 2011 .

[14]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Integrated bank performance assessment and management planning using hybrid minimax reference point - DEA approach , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Ali Ebrahimnejad,et al.  Equivalence relationship between the general combined-oriented CCR model and the weighted minimax MOLP formulation , 2012 .

[16]  Barton A. Smith,et al.  Comparative Site Evaluations for Locating a High-Energy Physics Lab in Texas , 1986 .

[17]  W.-M. Lu,et al.  A benchmark-learning roadmap for regional sustainable development in China , 2007, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[18]  James P. Spillane,et al.  Diagnosis and Design for School Improvement: Using a Distributed Perspective to Lead and Manage Change , 2011 .

[19]  Harald Dyckhoff,et al.  Measuring ecological efficiency with data envelopment analysis (DEA) , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[21]  T. Nunnikhoven,et al.  Technical efficiency of for‐profit and non‐profit nursing homes , 1992 .

[22]  A. Charnes,et al.  Polyhedral Cone-Ratio DEA Models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks , 1990 .

[23]  Michael F. Addonizio X-Efficiency and Effective Schools: A New Look at Old Theories , 2009 .

[24]  Ulrike Mandl,et al.  The effectiveness and efficiency of public spending , 2008 .

[25]  Jyrki Wallenius,et al.  Value efficiency analysis of academic research , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfi,et al.  Target setting in data envelopment analysis using MOLP , 2011 .

[27]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  J. Wallenius,et al.  A Value Efficiency Approach to Incorporating Preference Information in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1999 .

[29]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Weights restrictions and value judgements in Data Envelopment Analysis: Evolution, development and future directions , 1997, Ann. Oper. Res..

[30]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Normal vector identification and interactive tradeoff analysis using minimax formulation in multiobjective optimization , 2002, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[31]  Per Joakim Agrell,et al.  Structural and behavioral robustness in applied best-practice regulation , 2014 .

[32]  S. Zionts,et al.  An Interactive Programming Method for Solving the Multiple Criteria Problem , 1976 .

[33]  Zhongsheng Hua,et al.  Eco-efficiency analysis of paper mills along the Huai River: An extended DEA approach , 2007 .

[34]  Geraint Johnes,et al.  The effect of competition on the efficiency of secondary schools in England , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[35]  Yaakov Roll,et al.  An application procedure for DEA , 1989 .

[36]  Michael G. Pollitt,et al.  Ownership and Performance in Electric Utilities , 1998 .

[37]  Oliver Stein,et al.  A Semi-Infinite Programming Model In Data Envelopment Analysis , 2001 .

[38]  Sheila E. Murray,et al.  State Education Spending: Current Pressures and Future Trends , 2007, National Tax Journal.

[39]  Ali Ebrahimnejad,et al.  Target setting in the general combined-oriented CCR model using an interactive MOLP method , 2010, J. Comput. Appl. Math..

[40]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Gradient projection and local region search for multiobjective optimisation , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[41]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  Efficiency Analysis for Exogenously Fixed Inputs and Outputs , 1986, Oper. Res..

[42]  Philippe Vanden Eeckaut,et al.  Evaluating the performance of US credit unions , 1993 .

[43]  Ali Ebrahimnejad,et al.  Relationship between MOLP and DEA based on output-orientated CCR dual model , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[44]  Pekka Korhonen,et al.  Multiple Objective Approach as an Alternative to Radial Projection in DEA , 2003 .

[45]  Boaz Golany,et al.  An Interactive MOLP Procedure for the Extension of DEA to Effectiveness Analysis , 1988 .

[46]  Christopher H. Tienken,et al.  Relationship between Class Size and Students' Opportunity to Learn Writing in Middle School. , 2009 .

[47]  C.A.K. Lovell,et al.  Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach , 1989 .

[48]  Dong-Ling Xu,et al.  Interactive minimax optimisation for integrated performance analysis and resource planning , 2014, Comput. Oper. Res..

[49]  Alireza Amirteimoori,et al.  An alternative clustering approach: a DEA-based procedure , 2013 .

[50]  V. V. Podinovski,et al.  Suitability and redundancy of non-homogeneous weight restrictions for measuring the relative efficiency in DEA , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[51]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Guiding Schools to Improved Performance Using Data Envelopment Analysis: An Illustration with Data from a Local Education Authority , 1994 .

[52]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  An interactive MOLP method for solving output-oriented DEA problems with undesirable factors , 2015 .

[53]  P. S. Dharmapala,et al.  Linked-cone DEA profit ratios and technical efficiency with application to Illinois coal mines , 1995 .

[54]  Marc Robinson,et al.  Does Performance Budgeting Work?: An Analytical Review of the Empirical Literature , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[55]  Harold O. Fried,et al.  Incorporating the Operating Environment Into a Nonparametric Measure of Technical Efficiency , 1999 .

[56]  S. Grosskopf,et al.  Measuring hospital performance. A non-parametric approach. , 1987, Journal of health economics.

[57]  J.-M. Huguenin,et al.  Adjusting for the environment in DEA: A comparison of alternative models based on empirical data , 2015 .

[58]  Thomas R. Sexton,et al.  Operational performance of U.S. public rail transit and implications for public policy , 2014 .

[59]  John Ruggiero,et al.  Measuring efficiency in Australian Schools: A preliminary analysis , 2014 .

[60]  Craig E. Richards,et al.  Getting Real: A Different Perspective on the Relationship Between School Resources and Student Outcomes , 2007 .

[61]  S. You,et al.  A new approach in modelling undesirable output in DEA model , 2011, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[62]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Using interactive multiobjective methods to solve DEA problems with value judgements , 2009, Comput. Oper. Res..

[63]  Paul Rouse,et al.  Competition and public high school performance , 2014 .

[64]  Katherine G. Willoughby,et al.  Performance Budgeting in American States: A Framework of Integrating Performance with Budgeting , 2015 .

[65]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  On Returns to Scale under Weight Restrictions in Data Envelopment Analysis , 2001 .

[66]  Miguel A. Hinojosa,et al.  Axial solutions for multiple objective linear problems. An application to target setting in DEA models with preferences , 2011 .

[67]  Juan Aparicio,et al.  Closest targets and minimum distance to the Pareto-efficient frontier in DEA , 2007 .

[68]  Ralph E. Steuer,et al.  An interactive weighted Tchebycheff procedure for multiple objective programming , 1983, Math. Program..

[69]  Sangchan Kantabutra,et al.  USING A DEA MANAGEMENT TOOL THROUGH A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH: AN EXAMINATION OF URBAN-RURAL EFFECTS ON THAI SCHOOL EFFICIENCY , 2009 .

[70]  Pekka Korhonen,et al.  On the Use of Value Efficiency Analysis and Some Further Developments , 2002 .

[71]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Exploring output quality targets in the provision of perinatal care in England using data envelopment analysis , 1995 .

[72]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  An interactive MOLP method for identifying target units in output-oriented DEA models: The NATO enlargement problem , 2014 .

[73]  Russell G. Thompson,et al.  The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming , 1990 .

[74]  Sherrilyn M. Billger,et al.  Demographics, Fiscal Health, and School Quality: Shedding Light on School Closure Decisions , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[75]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Evaluating Program and Managerial Efficiency: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Program Follow Through , 1981 .

[76]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Measuring Gains in Operational Efficiency from Information Technology: A Study of the Positran Deployment at Hardee'S Inc. , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[77]  John E. Beasley,et al.  Restricting Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1990 .

[78]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[79]  Sanjay Jain,et al.  Manufacturing performance measurement and target setting: A data envelopment analysis approach , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..