Development of workflow task analysis during cerebral diagnostic angiographies: time-based comparison of junior and senior tasks.

OBJECTIVE Assessing neuroradiologists' skills in the operating room (OR) is difficult and often subjective. This study used a workflow time-based task analysis approach while performing cerebral angiography. METHODS Eight angiographies performed by a senior neuroradiologist and eight performed by a junior neuroradiologist were compared. Dedicated software with specific terminology was used to record the tasks. Procedures were subdivided into phases, each comprising multiple tasks. Each task was defined as a triplet, associating an action, an instrument and an anatomical structure. The duration of each task was the metric. Total duration of the procedure, task duration and the number of times a task was repeated were identified. The focus was on tasks using fluoroscopy and for moving the X-ray table/tube. RESULTS The total duration of tasks to complete the entire procedure was longer for the junior operators than for the seniors (P=0.012). The mean duration per task during the navigation phase was 86s for the juniors and 43s for the seniors (P=0.002). The total and mean durations of tasks involving the use of fluoroscopy were also longer for the juniors (P=0.002 and P=0.033, respectively). For tasks involving the table/tube, the total and mean durations were again longer for the juniors (P=0.019 and P=0.082, respectively). CONCLUSION This approach allows reliable skill assessment in the radiology OR and comparison of junior and senior competencies during cerebral diagnostic angiography. This new tool can improve the quality and safety of procedures, and facilitate the learning process for neuroradiologists.

[1]  T. Neumuth,et al.  Structured recording of intraoperative surgical workflows , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[2]  Pierre Jannin,et al.  An Application-Dependent Framework for the Recognition of High-Level Surgical Tasks in the OR , 2011, MICCAI.

[3]  Gero Strauß,et al.  Research Paper: Validation of Knowledge Acquisition for Surgical Process Models , 2009, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[4]  Kevin Cleary,et al.  Workflow in interventional radiology: nerve blocks and facet blocks , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[5]  Thomas Neumuth,et al.  The tool landscap for surgical workflow analysis , 2007 .

[6]  Thomas Neumuth,et al.  Workflow analysis of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in infant pigs- a model for surgical feedback and training. , 2008, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[7]  Pierre Jannin,et al.  Surgical models for computer-assisted neurosurgery , 2007, NeuroImage.

[8]  M. Frecker,et al.  Sequence and task analysis of instrument use in common laparoscopic procedures , 2002, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[9]  Kevin Cleary,et al.  Workflow in interventional radiology: uterine fibroid embolization (UFE) , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[10]  Thomas Neumuth,et al.  Assessment of technical needs for surgical equipment by surgical process models , 2009, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[11]  J Dankelman,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the functionality and efficiency of three surgical dissection techniques: a time-motion analysis. , 1999, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[12]  Gero Strauß,et al.  Workflow analysis for mechatronic and imaging assistance in head surgery , 2004, CARS.

[13]  Thomas Neumuth,et al.  Analysis of surgical intervention populations using generic surgical process models , 2010, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[14]  Manisha Mantri,et al.  Unified Medical Language System , 2013 .

[15]  James R Duncan,et al.  Strategies for improving safety and quality in interventional radiology. , 2008, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[16]  P. Jannin,et al.  Model of Surgical Procedures for Multimodal Image-Guided Neurosurgery , 2003, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[17]  Ara Darzi,et al.  What Does Competence Entail in Interventional Radiology? , 2010, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[18]  Gero Strauß,et al.  Acquisition of Process Descriptions from Surgical Interventions , 2006, DEXA.

[19]  Rajesh Aggarwal,et al.  Technical-skills training in the 21st century. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  Germain Forestier,et al.  Classification of surgical processes using dynamic time warping , 2012, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[21]  Pierre Jannin,et al.  Surgical Tools Recognition and Pupil Segmentation for Cataract Surgical Process Modeling , 2012, MMVR.

[22]  Cornelis A Grimbergen,et al.  Evaluation of vascular and interventional procedures with time-action analysis: a pilot study. , 2002, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[23]  T. Neumuth,et al.  Recording of Surgical Processes: A Study Comparing Senior and Junior Neurosurgeons During Lumbar Disc Herniation Surgery , 2010, Neurosurgery.

[24]  A. Darzi,et al.  Assessing operative skill , 1999, BMJ.