Conformational Sampling and Nucleotide-Dependent Transitions of the GroEL Subunit Probed by Unbiased Molecular Dynamics Simulations
暂无分享,去创建一个
James Andrew McCammon | Lars Skjærven | Nathalie Reuter | Barry J. Grant | Arturo Muga | Knut Teigen | Aurora Martinez | J. Mccammon | N. Reuter | B. Grant | A. Muga | Aurora Martínez | K. Teigen | Lars Skjærven | J. McCammon
[1] Changbong Hyeon,et al. Dynamics of allosteric transitions in GroEL , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[2] Leo S. D. Caves,et al. Bio3d: An R Package , 2022 .
[3] R. Nussinov,et al. The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition. , 2009, Nature chemical biology.
[4] A. Horwich,et al. The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL–GroES–(ADP)7 chaperonin complex , 1997, Nature.
[5] J. Wang,et al. Structural basis for GroEL-assisted protein folding from the crystal structure of (GroEL-KMgATP)14 at 2.0A resolution. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.
[6] K. Wüthrich,et al. GroEL‐GroES‐mediated protein folding , 2006, Chemical reviews.
[7] G Vriend,et al. Conformational changes in the chaperonin GroEL: new insights into the allosteric mechanism. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.
[8] Lee-Wei Yang,et al. Coarse-Grained Models Reveal Functional Dynamics - I. Elastic Network Models – Theories, Comparisons and Perspectives , 2008, Bioinformatics and biology insights.
[9] Jianpeng Ma,et al. Usefulness and limitations of normal mode analysis in modeling dynamics of biomolecular complexes. , 2005, Structure.
[10] H. Saibil,et al. Allosteric signaling of ATP hydrolysis in GroEL–GroES complexes , 2006, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.
[11] B M Pettitt,et al. A sampling problem in molecular dynamics simulations of macromolecules. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[12] H. Taguchi,et al. Truncated GroEL monomer has the ability to promote folding of rhodanese without GroES and ATP , 1993, FEBS letters.
[13] S. Karlin,et al. Conservation among HSP60 sequences in relation to structure, function, and evolution , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[14] Yong Duan,et al. Distinguish protein decoys by Using a scoring function based on a new AMBER force field, short molecular dynamics simulations, and the generalized born solvent model , 2004, Proteins.
[15] Lars Skjærven,et al. Normal mode analysis for proteins , 2009 .
[16] M. Karplus,et al. Locally accessible conformations of proteins: Multiple molecular dynamics simulations of crambin , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[17] D. Thirumalai,et al. Annealing function of GroEL: structural and bioinformatic analysis. , 2002, Biophysical chemistry.
[18] Axel T Brunger,et al. Exploring the structural dynamics of the E.coli chaperonin GroEL using translation-libration-screw crystallographic refinement of intermediate states. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.
[19] M. Karplus,et al. Collective motions in proteins: A covariance analysis of atomic fluctuations in molecular dynamics and normal mode simulations , 1991, Proteins.
[20] C. Chennubhotla,et al. Markov propagation of allosteric effects in biomolecular systems: application to GroEL–GroES , 2006, Molecular systems biology.
[21] Zachary W White,et al. A Monomeric Variant of GroEL Binds Nucleotides but Is Inactive as a Molecular Chaperone (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[22] D. Kern,et al. The role of dynamics in allosteric regulation. , 2003, Current opinion in structural biology.
[23] R L Jernigan,et al. Molecular mechanisms of chaperonin GroEL-GroES function. , 2002, Biochemistry.
[24] M. Orozco,et al. Cooperativity in drug-DNA recognition: a molecular dynamics study. , 2001, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[25] S. Miller. The structure of interfaces between subunits of dimeric and tetrameric proteins. , 1989, Protein engineering.
[26] A. Velázquez‐Campoy,et al. Energetics of nucleotide-induced DnaK conformational states. , 2010, Biochemistry.
[27] A. Horovitz,et al. The N terminus of the molecular chaperonin GroEL is a crucial structural element for its assembly. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.
[28] M Karplus,et al. The allosteric mechanism of the chaperonin GroEL: a dynamic analysis. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[29] I. Bahar,et al. Coarse-grained normal mode analysis in structural biology. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.
[30] E. Vanden-Eijnden,et al. Large-scale conformational sampling of proteins using temperature-accelerated molecular dynamics , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[31] Y. Sanejouand,et al. Hinge‐bending motion in citrate synthase arising from normal mode calculations , 1995, Proteins.
[32] S W Englander,et al. Chaperonin function: folding by forced unfolding. , 1999, Science.
[33] B. Gowen,et al. ATP-Bound States of GroEL Captured by Cryo-Electron Microscopy , 2001, Cell.
[34] C Chothia,et al. Surface, subunit interfaces and interior of oligomeric proteins. , 1988, Journal of molecular biology.
[35] Zbyszek Otwinowski,et al. The 2.4 Å crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL complexed with ATPγS , 1996, Nature Structural Biology.
[36] Nathalie Reuter,et al. Principal component and normal mode analysis of proteins; a quantitative comparison using the GroEL subunit , 2011, Proteins.
[37] D. Thirumalai,et al. Allosteric transitions in the chaperonin GroEL are captured by a dominant normal mode that is most robust to sequence variations. , 2007, Biophysical journal.
[38] H. Rye,et al. GroEL stimulates protein folding through forced unfolding , 2008, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.
[39] G. A. Frank,et al. Out-of-equilibrium conformational cycling of GroEL under saturating ATP concentrations , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[40] D. Gibbons,et al. Hydrophobic Surfaces That Are Hidden in Chaperonin Cpn60 Can Be Exposed by Formation of Assembly-Competent Monomers or by Ionic Perturbation of the Oligomer (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[41] Amnon Horovitz,et al. Allosteric regulation of chaperonins. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.
[42] A. Horwich,et al. Distinct actions of cis and trans ATP within the double ring of the chaperonin GroEL , 1997, Nature.
[43] A. Horovitz,et al. Dissociation of the GroEL-GroES asymmetric complex is accelerated by increased cooperativity in ATP binding to the GroEL ring distal to GroES. , 2002, Biochemistry.
[44] H. Taguchi,et al. Monomeric chaperonin-60 and its 50-kDa fragment possess the ability to interact with non-native proteins, to suppress aggregation, and to promote protein folding. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.
[45] Cecilia Bartolucci,et al. Crystal structure of wild-type chaperonin GroEL. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.
[46] C. Georgopoulos,et al. Identification of a host protein necessary for bacteriophage morphogenesis (the groE gene product). , 1978, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[47] Yelena R. Sliozberg,et al. Spontaneous conformational changes in the E. coli GroEL subunit from all-atom molecular dynamics simulations. , 2007, Biophysical journal.
[48] Helen R. Saibil,et al. GroEL-GroES Cycling ATP and Nonnative Polypeptide Direct Alternation of Folding-Active Rings , 1999, Cell.
[49] M Karplus,et al. A Dynamic Model for the Allosteric Mechanism of GroEL , 2000 .
[50] Heather A. Carlson,et al. Development of polyphosphate parameters for use with the AMBER force field , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..
[51] A. Amadei,et al. On the convergence of the conformational coordinates basis set obtained by the essential dynamics analysis of proteins' molecular dynamics simulations , 1999, Proteins.
[52] D Perahia,et al. Motions in hemoglobin studied by normal mode analysis and energy minimization: evidence for the existence of tertiary T-like, quaternary R-like intermediate structures. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.
[53] D. J. Naylor,et al. Proteome-wide Analysis of Chaperonin-Dependent Protein Folding in Escherichia coli , 2005, Cell.
[54] E. Kovács,et al. Characterisation of a GroEL single-ring mutant that supports growth of Escherichia coli and has GroES-dependent ATPase activity. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.
[55] D. Thirumalai,et al. Allostery wiring diagrams in the transitions that drive the GroEL reaction cycle. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.
[56] C. Georgopoulos,et al. The groES and groEL heat shock gene products of Escherichia coli are essential for bacterial growth at all temperatures , 1989, Journal of bacteriology.
[57] Dmitrij Frishman,et al. Identification of in vivo substrates of the chaperonin GroEL , 1999, Nature.
[58] RosemanAM ChenS FurtakK FentonWA SaibilHR HorwichAL RyeHS. GroEL-GroES cycling: ATP and nonnative polypeptide direct alternation of folding-active rings. , 1999 .
[59] W. Delano. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System , 2002 .
[60] Wei Zhang,et al. A point‐charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed‐phase quantum mechanical calculations , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..
[61] R. Nussinov,et al. The origin of allosteric functional modulation: multiple pre-existing pathways. , 2009, Structure.
[62] N. Lissin,et al. (Mg–ATP)-dependent self-assembly of molecular chaperone GroEL , 1990, Nature.
[63] W. L. Jorgensen,et al. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .
[64] T. N. Bhat,et al. The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..
[65] K. Teilum,et al. Functional aspects of protein flexibility , 2009, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.
[66] Zheng Yang,et al. Allosteric Transitions of Supramolecular Systems Explored by Network Models: Application to Chaperonin GroEL , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[67] D. Boisvert,et al. The 2.4 A crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL complexed with ATP gamma S. , 1996, Nature structural biology.
[68] D. Koshland,et al. Comparison of experimental binding data and theoretical models in proteins containing subunits. , 1966, Biochemistry.
[69] Jianyin Shao,et al. Clustering Molecular Dynamics Trajectories: 1. Characterizing the Performance of Different Clustering Algorithms. , 2007, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[70] J. Berg,et al. Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.
[71] H. Berendsen,et al. Essential dynamics of proteins , 1993, Proteins.
[72] Jianpeng Ma,et al. A normal mode analysis of structural plasticity in the biomolecular motor F(1)-ATPase. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.
[73] M. Karplus,et al. Allostery and cooperativity revisited , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[74] K. Kuwajima,et al. Thermodynamics of nucleotide binding to the chaperonin GroEL studied by isothermal titration calorimetry: evidence for noncooperative nucleotide binding. , 1999, Biochimica et biophysica acta.
[75] Zbyszek Otwinowski,et al. The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonln GroEL at 2.8 Å , 1994, Nature.
[76] Bernard R Brooks,et al. Residues in substrate proteins that interact with GroEL in the capture process are buried in the native state. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[77] A. Horovitz,et al. Mapping pathways of allosteric communication in GroEL by analysis of correlated mutations , 2002, Proteins.