Conformational Sampling and Nucleotide-Dependent Transitions of the GroEL Subunit Probed by Unbiased Molecular Dynamics Simulations

GroEL is an ATP dependent molecular chaperone that promotes the folding of a large number of substrate proteins in E. coli. Large-scale conformational transitions occurring during the reaction cycle have been characterized from extensive crystallographic studies. However, the link between the observed conformations and the mechanisms involved in the allosteric response to ATP and the nucleotide-driven reaction cycle are not completely established. Here we describe extensive (in total long) unbiased molecular dynamics (MD) simulations that probe the response of GroEL subunits to ATP binding. We observe nucleotide dependent conformational transitions, and show with multiple 100 ns long simulations that the ligand-induced shift in the conformational populations are intrinsically coded in the structure-dynamics relationship of the protein subunit. Thus, these simulations reveal a stabilization of the equatorial domain upon nucleotide binding and a concomitant “opening” of the subunit, which reaches a conformation close to that observed in the crystal structure of the subunits within the ADP-bound oligomer. Moreover, we identify changes in a set of unique intrasubunit interactions potentially important for the conformational transition.

[1]  Changbong Hyeon,et al.  Dynamics of allosteric transitions in GroEL , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Leo S. D. Caves,et al.  Bio3d: An R Package , 2022 .

[3]  R. Nussinov,et al.  The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition. , 2009, Nature chemical biology.

[4]  A. Horwich,et al.  The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL–GroES–(ADP)7 chaperonin complex , 1997, Nature.

[5]  J. Wang,et al.  Structural basis for GroEL-assisted protein folding from the crystal structure of (GroEL-KMgATP)14 at 2.0A resolution. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  K. Wüthrich,et al.  GroEL‐GroES‐mediated protein folding , 2006, Chemical reviews.

[7]  G Vriend,et al.  Conformational changes in the chaperonin GroEL: new insights into the allosteric mechanism. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  Lee-Wei Yang,et al.  Coarse-Grained Models Reveal Functional Dynamics - I. Elastic Network Models – Theories, Comparisons and Perspectives , 2008, Bioinformatics and biology insights.

[9]  Jianpeng Ma,et al.  Usefulness and limitations of normal mode analysis in modeling dynamics of biomolecular complexes. , 2005, Structure.

[10]  H. Saibil,et al.  Allosteric signaling of ATP hydrolysis in GroEL–GroES complexes , 2006, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[11]  B M Pettitt,et al.  A sampling problem in molecular dynamics simulations of macromolecules. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  H. Taguchi,et al.  Truncated GroEL monomer has the ability to promote folding of rhodanese without GroES and ATP , 1993, FEBS letters.

[13]  S. Karlin,et al.  Conservation among HSP60 sequences in relation to structure, function, and evolution , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[14]  Yong Duan,et al.  Distinguish protein decoys by Using a scoring function based on a new AMBER force field, short molecular dynamics simulations, and the generalized born solvent model , 2004, Proteins.

[15]  Lars Skjærven,et al.  Normal mode analysis for proteins , 2009 .

[16]  M. Karplus,et al.  Locally accessible conformations of proteins: Multiple molecular dynamics simulations of crambin , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[17]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Annealing function of GroEL: structural and bioinformatic analysis. , 2002, Biophysical chemistry.

[18]  Axel T Brunger,et al.  Exploring the structural dynamics of the E.coli chaperonin GroEL using translation-libration-screw crystallographic refinement of intermediate states. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  M. Karplus,et al.  Collective motions in proteins: A covariance analysis of atomic fluctuations in molecular dynamics and normal mode simulations , 1991, Proteins.

[20]  C. Chennubhotla,et al.  Markov propagation of allosteric effects in biomolecular systems: application to GroEL–GroES , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[21]  Zachary W White,et al.  A Monomeric Variant of GroEL Binds Nucleotides but Is Inactive as a Molecular Chaperone (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[22]  D. Kern,et al.  The role of dynamics in allosteric regulation. , 2003, Current opinion in structural biology.

[23]  R L Jernigan,et al.  Molecular mechanisms of chaperonin GroEL-GroES function. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[24]  M. Orozco,et al.  Cooperativity in drug-DNA recognition: a molecular dynamics study. , 2001, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[25]  S. Miller The structure of interfaces between subunits of dimeric and tetrameric proteins. , 1989, Protein engineering.

[26]  A. Velázquez‐Campoy,et al.  Energetics of nucleotide-induced DnaK conformational states. , 2010, Biochemistry.

[27]  A. Horovitz,et al.  The N terminus of the molecular chaperonin GroEL is a crucial structural element for its assembly. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[28]  M Karplus,et al.  The allosteric mechanism of the chaperonin GroEL: a dynamic analysis. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  I. Bahar,et al.  Coarse-grained normal mode analysis in structural biology. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[30]  E. Vanden-Eijnden,et al.  Large-scale conformational sampling of proteins using temperature-accelerated molecular dynamics , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Y. Sanejouand,et al.  Hinge‐bending motion in citrate synthase arising from normal mode calculations , 1995, Proteins.

[32]  S W Englander,et al.  Chaperonin function: folding by forced unfolding. , 1999, Science.

[33]  B. Gowen,et al.  ATP-Bound States of GroEL Captured by Cryo-Electron Microscopy , 2001, Cell.

[34]  C Chothia,et al.  Surface, subunit interfaces and interior of oligomeric proteins. , 1988, Journal of molecular biology.

[35]  Zbyszek Otwinowski,et al.  The 2.4 Å crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL complexed with ATPγS , 1996, Nature Structural Biology.

[36]  Nathalie Reuter,et al.  Principal component and normal mode analysis of proteins; a quantitative comparison using the GroEL subunit , 2011, Proteins.

[37]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Allosteric transitions in the chaperonin GroEL are captured by a dominant normal mode that is most robust to sequence variations. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[38]  H. Rye,et al.  GroEL stimulates protein folding through forced unfolding , 2008, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[39]  G. A. Frank,et al.  Out-of-equilibrium conformational cycling of GroEL under saturating ATP concentrations , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  D. Gibbons,et al.  Hydrophobic Surfaces That Are Hidden in Chaperonin Cpn60 Can Be Exposed by Formation of Assembly-Competent Monomers or by Ionic Perturbation of the Oligomer (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[41]  Amnon Horovitz,et al.  Allosteric regulation of chaperonins. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[42]  A. Horwich,et al.  Distinct actions of cis and trans ATP within the double ring of the chaperonin GroEL , 1997, Nature.

[43]  A. Horovitz,et al.  Dissociation of the GroEL-GroES asymmetric complex is accelerated by increased cooperativity in ATP binding to the GroEL ring distal to GroES. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[44]  H. Taguchi,et al.  Monomeric chaperonin-60 and its 50-kDa fragment possess the ability to interact with non-native proteins, to suppress aggregation, and to promote protein folding. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[45]  Cecilia Bartolucci,et al.  Crystal structure of wild-type chaperonin GroEL. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[46]  C. Georgopoulos,et al.  Identification of a host protein necessary for bacteriophage morphogenesis (the groE gene product). , 1978, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  Yelena R. Sliozberg,et al.  Spontaneous conformational changes in the E. coli GroEL subunit from all-atom molecular dynamics simulations. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[48]  Helen R. Saibil,et al.  GroEL-GroES Cycling ATP and Nonnative Polypeptide Direct Alternation of Folding-Active Rings , 1999, Cell.

[49]  M Karplus,et al.  A Dynamic Model for the Allosteric Mechanism of GroEL , 2000 .

[50]  Heather A. Carlson,et al.  Development of polyphosphate parameters for use with the AMBER force field , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[51]  A. Amadei,et al.  On the convergence of the conformational coordinates basis set obtained by the essential dynamics analysis of proteins' molecular dynamics simulations , 1999, Proteins.

[52]  D Perahia,et al.  Motions in hemoglobin studied by normal mode analysis and energy minimization: evidence for the existence of tertiary T-like, quaternary R-like intermediate structures. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[53]  D. J. Naylor,et al.  Proteome-wide Analysis of Chaperonin-Dependent Protein Folding in Escherichia coli , 2005, Cell.

[54]  E. Kovács,et al.  Characterisation of a GroEL single-ring mutant that supports growth of Escherichia coli and has GroES-dependent ATPase activity. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.

[55]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Allostery wiring diagrams in the transitions that drive the GroEL reaction cycle. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[56]  C. Georgopoulos,et al.  The groES and groEL heat shock gene products of Escherichia coli are essential for bacterial growth at all temperatures , 1989, Journal of bacteriology.

[57]  Dmitrij Frishman,et al.  Identification of in vivo substrates of the chaperonin GroEL , 1999, Nature.

[58]  RosemanAM ChenS FurtakK FentonWA SaibilHR HorwichAL RyeHS GroEL-GroES cycling: ATP and nonnative polypeptide direct alternation of folding-active rings. , 1999 .

[59]  W. Delano The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System , 2002 .

[60]  Wei Zhang,et al.  A point‐charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed‐phase quantum mechanical calculations , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[61]  R. Nussinov,et al.  The origin of allosteric functional modulation: multiple pre-existing pathways. , 2009, Structure.

[62]  N. Lissin,et al.  (Mg–ATP)-dependent self-assembly of molecular chaperone GroEL , 1990, Nature.

[63]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[64]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[65]  K. Teilum,et al.  Functional aspects of protein flexibility , 2009, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[66]  Zheng Yang,et al.  Allosteric Transitions of Supramolecular Systems Explored by Network Models: Application to Chaperonin GroEL , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[67]  D. Boisvert,et al.  The 2.4 A crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL complexed with ATP gamma S. , 1996, Nature structural biology.

[68]  D. Koshland,et al.  Comparison of experimental binding data and theoretical models in proteins containing subunits. , 1966, Biochemistry.

[69]  Jianyin Shao,et al.  Clustering Molecular Dynamics Trajectories: 1. Characterizing the Performance of Different Clustering Algorithms. , 2007, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[70]  J. Berg,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.

[71]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Essential dynamics of proteins , 1993, Proteins.

[72]  Jianpeng Ma,et al.  A normal mode analysis of structural plasticity in the biomolecular motor F(1)-ATPase. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[73]  M. Karplus,et al.  Allostery and cooperativity revisited , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[74]  K. Kuwajima,et al.  Thermodynamics of nucleotide binding to the chaperonin GroEL studied by isothermal titration calorimetry: evidence for noncooperative nucleotide binding. , 1999, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[75]  Zbyszek Otwinowski,et al.  The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonln GroEL at 2.8 Å , 1994, Nature.

[76]  Bernard R Brooks,et al.  Residues in substrate proteins that interact with GroEL in the capture process are buried in the native state. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[77]  A. Horovitz,et al.  Mapping pathways of allosteric communication in GroEL by analysis of correlated mutations , 2002, Proteins.