Phase I study of a novel capecitabine schedule based on the Norton-Simon mathematical model in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE This study was conducted to determine, in patients with advanced-stage breast cancer, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of capecitabine administered orally for 7 days followed by a 7-day rest (7/7), a schedule based on a mathematical method for the optimization of anticancer drug scheduling. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients had measurable, metastatic breast cancer. There was no limit to number of prior treatments. A standard, three-patients-per-cohort dose-escalation scheme used flat-dose capecitabine beginning at 1,500 mg orally twice daily (bid) on a 7/7 schedule. Each cohort was monitored for 28 days before escalation to the next cohort to assess for delayed toxicity. Response was evaluated radiographically every 12 weeks; toxicity was assessed every 2 weeks. RESULTS Twenty-one patients were treated on study. The most frequently reported treatment-related grade 2/3 adverse events were hand-foot syndrome (29%), leukopenia/neutropenia (24%), and fatigue (19%). Grade 3 toxicity was transient and easily managed. Three patients experienced grade 3 hand-foot syndrome; one of these patients had grade 3 diarrhea. There were no grade 4 events. The MTD of capecitabine 7/7 is 2,000 mg twice daily. CONCLUSION As predicted by mathematical modeling, capecitabine dosing for 7 days followed by a 7-day rest is well tolerated. Efficacy of this schedule is being determined in a phase II clinical trial in patients with advanced breast cancer.

[1]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Tolerability of fluoropyrimidines appears to differ by region. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2006 , 2006, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[3]  D. Berry,et al.  Dose-dense (DD) AC followed by paclitaxel is associated with moderate, frequent anemia compared to sequential (S) and/or less DD Treatment: Update by CALGB on Breast Cancer Intergroup Trial C9741 with ECOG, SWOG, & NCCTG , 2005 .

[4]  Larry Norton,et al.  Conceptual and practical implications of breast tissue geometry: toward a more effective, less toxic therapy. , 2005, The oncologist.

[5]  G. Rosner,et al.  Prospective Evaluation of Body Surface Area as a Determinant of Paclitaxel Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Women with Solid Tumors , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[6]  J. Lokich Capecitabine: Fixed Daily Dose and Continuous (Noncyclic) Dosing Schedule , 2004, Cancer investigation.

[7]  Mark J. Ratain,et al.  Body Surface Area as a Determinant of Pharmacokinetics and Drug Dosing , 2001, Investigational New Drugs.

[8]  A. Schindler,et al.  Multicenter phase II study of oral capecitabine (Xeloda(")) in patients with metastatic breast cancer relapsing after treatment with a taxane-containing therapy. , 2003, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[9]  Barbara L. Smith,et al.  Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  K. Matthay,et al.  Phase I clinical trial of intrathecal topotecan in patients with neoplastic meningitis. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  W. Scheithauer,et al.  Biweekly high-dose gemcitabine alone or in combination with capecitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a randomized phase II trial. , 2003, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[12]  L. Grochow,et al.  Role of body surface area in dosing of investigational anticancer agents in adults, 1991-2001. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[13]  Antonius A. Miller Body surface area in dosing anticancer agents: scratch the surface! , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[14]  W. Scheithauer,et al.  Intermittent weekly high-dose capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin: a phase I/II study in first-line treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer. , 2002, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[15]  M. Ratain,et al.  Update on pharmacogenetics in cancer chemotherapy. , 2002, European journal of cancer.

[16]  Mary V. Relling,et al.  Pharmacogenetics and cancer therapy , 2001, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[17]  A. Buzdar,et al.  Multicenter, Phase II study of capecitabine in taxane‐pretreated metastatic breast carcinoma patients , 2001, Cancer.

[18]  H. Burger,et al.  Randomized, open-label, phase II trial of oral capecitabine (Xeloda) vs. a reference arm of intravenous CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) as first-line therapy for advanced/metastatic breast cancer. , 2001, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[19]  F. D. De Braud,et al.  Pharmacogenetic determinants of anti-cancer drug activity and toxicity. , 2001, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[20]  W. Evans,et al.  Pharmacogenomics: unlocking the human genome for better drug therapy. , 2001, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[21]  H. Burger,et al.  Capecitabine, an oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate with substantial activity in advanced colorectal cancer: results of a randomized phase II study. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  A. Buzdar,et al.  Multicenter phase II study of capecitabine in paclitaxel-refractory metastatic breast cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  B. Reigner,et al.  Phase I and pharmacologic study of intermittent twice-daily oral therapy with capecitabine in patients with advanced and/or metastatic cancer. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  M. Ratain Body-surface area as a basis for dosing of anticancer agents: science, myth, or habit? , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  H. Gurney,et al.  Dose calculation of anticancer drugs: a review of the current practice and introduction of an alternative. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  J. Spratt,et al.  Mammographic assessment of human breast cancer growth and duration , 1993 .

[27]  J S Spratt,et al.  Decelerating growth and human breast cancer , 1993, Cancer.

[28]  L. Norton,et al.  The Norton-Simon hypothesis revisited. , 1986, Cancer treatment reports.

[29]  A. J. Valleron,et al.  A simulation model of the natural history of human breast cancer. , 1985, British Journal of Cancer.

[30]  M. Retsky,et al.  A stochastic numerical model of breast cancer growth that simulates clinical data. , 1984, Cancer research.

[31]  L. Norton,et al.  Tumor size, sensitivity to therapy, and design of treatment schedules. , 1977, Cancer treatment reports.

[32]  L. Norton,et al.  Growth curve of an experimental solid tumor following radiotherapy. , 1977, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[33]  L. Norton,et al.  Predicting the course of Gompertzian growth , 1976, Nature.

[34]  H. Skipper,et al.  Kinetics of mammary tumor cell growth and implications for therapy , 1971, Cancer.