ASSESSMENT OF OPTIMAL ARMA MODEL ORDERS FOR MODAL ANALYSIS

Abstract The Autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model is a very efficient technique for modal parameter identification of mechanical systems, especially when the signal is noisy. However, when significant noise is present in the signal, it is necessary to increase the computational order of the ARMA model. Consequently, this artificial increase of the model order yields to a more difficult identification of the exact number of modal parameters in a given frequency range, especially when we have no prior knowledge of the behaviour of the mechanical system. A new method based on the eigenvalues of a modified covariance matrix is proposed. It is shown that the eigenvalues of the covariance matrix that lead to a minimum and constant value depending on the noise level, correspond to supplementary orders induced by the noise. Thus, the exact order of the mechanical system is revealed from the analysis of the eigenvalue magnitudes with the model order. The analysis of the gradient of the eigenvalue computed at the exact order allows also to select the minimal and necessary order used for computation, without any prior modal parameter identification. This method is robust to noise level and sensitive to the sampling frequency. Thus, the application of the proposed method at different sampling frequencies allows to select the optimal sampling frequency by reducing the lack of accuracy in the identification of modal parameters.

[1]  J. Rissanen,et al.  Modeling By Shortest Data Description* , 1978, Autom..

[2]  A. Al-Smadi,et al.  On estimating ARMA model orders , 1996, 1996 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems. Circuits and Systems Connecting the World. ISCAS 96.

[3]  D. Bensoussan,et al.  Active control of vibrations by low-pass filter and state feedback on a flexible structure , 1995, Proceedings 1995 Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering.

[4]  C. Lawson,et al.  Solving least squares problems , 1976, Classics in applied mathematics.

[5]  D. J. Ewins,et al.  Modal Testing: Theory and Practice , 1984 .

[6]  H. Nguyen,et al.  DÉTECTION DE FISSURES DE ROTORS PAR ANALYSE MODALE EXPÉRIMENTALE , 1995 .

[7]  Steven Kay,et al.  Modern Spectral Estimation: Theory and Application , 1988 .

[8]  E. Hannan.  The Estimation of the Order of an ARMA Process , 1980 .

[9]  Danilo Capecchi,et al.  Difference models for identification of mechanical linear systems in dynamics , 1989 .

[10]  M. H. Perrott,et al.  An efficient approach to ARMA modeling of biological systems with multiple inputs and delays , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  N. Miki,et al.  ARMA model order estimation based on the SVD of the data matrix , 1994 .

[12]  Benjamin C. Kuo,et al.  Digital Control Systems , 1977 .

[13]  D. Mitchell Wilkes,et al.  ARMA model order estimation based on the eigenvalues of the covariance matrix , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[14]  Petar M. Djuric,et al.  Order selection of autoregressive models , 1992, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[15]  Spilios D. Fassois,et al.  Recursive Identification of Vibrating Structures from Noise-Corrupted Observations, Part 2: Performance Evaluation via Numerical and Laboratory Experiments , 1991 .

[16]  C. Gontier,et al.  Robustness of an arma identification method for modal analysis of mechanical systems in the presence of noise , 1995 .

[17]  S. Fassois,et al.  Recursive identification of vibrating structures from noise-corrupted observations , 1991 .

[18]  C. Gontier,et al.  A time domain method for the identification of dynamic parameters of structures , 1993 .