Benchmarking of a novel solid sorbent CO2 capture process for NGCC power generation

Abstract The successful deployment of any technology depends on many important factors. One of the critical ones that affect the success of post combustion CO2 capture technologies is the ability to reduce the increase in cost of electricity associated with retrofitting the capture unit to electricity generating power plants. High capture costs associated with conventional MEA solvent processes has opened an opportunity for the emergence of many competing technologies aimed at reducing the cost of capture. This paper presents the technical and economic benchmarking of a polyethyleneimine (PEI)-based solid sorbent CO2 capture process as compared to the conventional MEA solvent process, with both technologies applied to a natural gas combined cycle (NGCC) power plant. The results of this evaluation indicate that the PEI-based sorbent process requires approximately 25% less regeneration steam than the conventional MEA process primarily due to avoiding the energy demand required for heat of vaporization of water in the MEA process. The PEI solid sorbent based process results in approximately 6.3 power plant efficiency point reduction as opposed to an 8 efficiency points for the MEA based process. The design of the fluidized-bed absorption and regeneration reactors in the novel solid sorbent process result in significant reductions in capital costs (21% reduction compared to MEA). The economic evaluation shows that the PEI-based solid sorbent process offers attractive reductions in the cost of electricity and the CO2 capture cost. The estimated cost of electricity, after adding the CO2 capture process, is found to be 85 and 81.7 $/kWh for the MEA-based and PEI based process, respectively. Moreover, the cost of CO2 avoided for both process is estimated to be 69.8 and 62 $/ton CO2 for the MEA and PEI process, respectively.

[1]  Satoshi Saito,et al.  Novel hindered amine absorbent for CO2 capture , 2013 .

[2]  Farzaneh Feyzi,et al.  Experimental investigation on the effect of addition of amine activators to aqueous solutions of N-methyldiethanolamine on the rate of carbon dioxide absorption , 2012 .

[3]  Meihong Wang,et al.  Dynamic modelling of CO2 absorption for post combustion capture in coal-fired power plants , 2009 .

[4]  Aaron Cottrell,et al.  Performance of MEA and amine-blends in the CSIRO PCC pilot plant at Loy Yang Power in Australia , 2012 .

[5]  Bruce G. Miller,et al.  Adsorption separation of carbon dioxide from flue gas of natural gas-fired boiler by a novel nanoporous “molecular basket” adsorbent , 2005 .

[6]  Bruce G. Miller,et al.  Adsorption separation of CO 2 from simulated flue gas mixtures by novel CO 2 "molecular basket" adsorbents , 2004 .

[7]  Liv-Margrethe Bjerge,et al.  Solid Sorbent CO2 Capture Technology Evaluation and Demonstration at Norcem's Cement Plant in Brevik, Norway , 2014 .

[8]  Chakib Bouallou,et al.  Comparison of absorption rates and absorption capacity of ammonia solvents with MEA and MDEA aqueous blends for CO2 capture , 2010 .

[9]  G. Versteeg,et al.  CO2 capture from power plants. Part I: A parametric study of the technical performance based on monoethanolamine , 2007 .

[10]  Mohammad R.M. Abu-Zahra,et al.  Evaluation of amine-blend solvent systems for CO2 post-combustion capture applications☆ , 2013 .

[11]  Olav Bolland,et al.  Optimized process configurations of post-combustion CO2 capture for natural-gas-fired power plant—Exergy analysis , 2011 .

[12]  Magne Hillestad,et al.  Capital costs and energy considerations of different alternative stripper configurations for post combustion CO2 capture , 2011 .

[13]  P. Feron,et al.  A survey of process flow sheet modifications for energy efficient CO2 capture from flue gases using chemical absorption , 2011 .

[14]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  A proposed methodology for CO2 capture and storage cost estimates , 2013 .

[15]  Cristian Dinca,et al.  Ghg emissions evaluation from fossil fuel with ccs , 2009 .

[16]  Olav Bolland,et al.  Optimized process configurations of post-combustion CO2 capture for natural-gas-fired power plant - Power plant efficiency analysis , 2012 .

[17]  Mohammad Abu Zahra,et al.  Advanced Solid Sorbent-Based CO2 Capture Process☆ , 2014 .

[18]  Jong-Hyeon Jung,et al.  Removal characteristics of CO2 using aqueous MEA/AMP solutions in the absorption and regeneration process. , 2009, Journal of environmental sciences.

[19]  Yuichi Fujioka,et al.  Synthesis and selection of hindered new amine absorbents for CO2 capture , 2011 .

[20]  Gary T. Rochelle,et al.  Aqueous piperazine as the new standard for CO2 capture technology , 2011 .

[21]  Bruce G. Miller,et al.  Novel Polyethylenimine-Modified Mesoporous Molecular Sieve of MCM-41 Type as High-Capacity Adsorbent for CO2 Capture , 2002 .

[22]  Mohammad Abu Zahra,et al.  Techno-economic assessment of future-proofing coal plants with postcombustion capture against technology developments , 2011 .

[23]  J. Andresen,et al.  Preparation and characterization of novel CO2 “molecular basket” adsorbents based on polymer-modified mesoporous molecular sieve MCM-41 , 2003 .