Stochastic filtering for determining gravity variations for decade‐long time series of GRACE gravity

We present a new stochastic filter technique for statistically rigorous separation of gravity signals and correlated “stripe” noises in a series of monthly gravitational spherical harmonic coefficients (SHCs) produced by the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite mission. Unlike the standard destriping process that removes the stripe contamination empirically, the stochastic approach simultaneously estimates gravity signals and correlated noises relying on covariance information that reflects both the spatial spectral features and temporal correlations among them. A major benefit of the technique is that by estimating the stripe noise in a Bayesian framework, we are able to propagate statistically rigorous covariances for the destriped GRACE SHCs, i.e. incorporating the impact of the destriping on the SHC uncertainties. The Bayesian approach yields a natural resolution for the gravity signal that reflects the correlated stripe noise, and thus achieve a kind of spatial smoothing in and of itself. No spatial Gaussian smoothing is formally required although it might be useful for some circumstances. Using the stochastic filter, we process a decade-length series of GRACE monthly gravity solutions, and compare the results with GRACE Tellus data products that are processed using the “standard” destriping procedure. The results show that the stochastic filter is able to remove the correlated stripe noise to a remarkable degree even without an explicit smoothing step. The estimates from the stochastic filter for each destriped GRACE field are suitable for Bayesian integration of GRACE with other geodetic measurements and models, and the statistically rigorous estimation of the time-varying rates and seasonal cycles in GRACE time series.

[1]  M. Tamisiea,et al.  GRACE Gravity Data Constrain Ancient Ice Geometries and Continental Dynamics over Laurentia , 2007, Science.

[2]  R. Rapp Improved models for potential coefficients and anomaly degree variances , 1973 .

[3]  Koji Matsuo,et al.  Coseismic gravity changes of the 2010 earthquake in central Chile from satellite gravimetry , 2010 .

[4]  M. Watkins,et al.  Improved methods for observing Earth's time variable mass distribution with GRACE using spherical cap mascons , 2015 .

[5]  C. Jekeli Alternative methods to smooth the Earth's gravity field , 1981 .

[6]  Archie Paulson,et al.  FAST TRACK PAPER: Inference of mantle viscosity from GRACE and relative sea level data , 2007 .

[7]  M. Cheng,et al.  GGM02 – An improved Earth gravity field model from GRACE , 2005 .

[8]  S. Williams The effect of coloured noise on the uncertainties of rates estimated from geodetic time series , 2003 .

[9]  Steven M. Klosko,et al.  Global Mass Flux Solutions from GRACE: A Comparison of Parameter Estimation Strategies - Mass Concentrations Versus Stokes Coefficients , 2010 .

[10]  Don P. Chambers,et al.  Evaluation of Release-05 GRACE time-variable gravity coefficients over the ocean , 2012 .

[11]  Tong Lee,et al.  A record‐high ocean bottom pressure in the South Pacific observed by GRACE , 2011 .

[12]  J. Camp,et al.  Antarctica, Greenland and Gulf of Alaska land-ice evolution from an iterated GRACE global mascon solution , 2013, Journal of Glaciology.

[13]  Eric Rignot,et al.  A Reconciled Estimate of Ice-Sheet Mass Balance , 2012, Science.

[14]  Longwei Xiang,et al.  Increased water storage in North America and Scandinavia from GRACE gravity data , 2012, Nature Geoscience.

[15]  Scott B. Luthcke,et al.  Improving global mass flux solutions from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) through forward modeling and continuous time correlation , 2010 .

[16]  B. Chao,et al.  An effective filtering for GRACE time‐variable gravity: Fan filter , 2009 .

[17]  F. Landerer,et al.  Accuracy of scaled GRACE terrestrial water storage estimates , 2012 .

[18]  C. Shum,et al.  Gravitational gradient changes following the 2004 December 26 Sumatra–Andaman Earthquake inferred from GRACE , 2012 .

[19]  C. Shum,et al.  Non-isotropic filtering of GRACE temporal gravity for geophysical signal enhancement , 2005 .

[20]  C. Shum,et al.  On the postprocessing removal of correlated errors in GRACE temporal gravity field solutions , 2009 .

[21]  Chen Ji,et al.  Crustal Dilatation Observed by GRACE After the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake , 2006, Science.

[22]  Ichiro Fukumori,et al.  Mechanisms Controlling the Interannual Variation of Mixed Layer Temperature Averaged over the Niño-3 Region , 2007 .

[23]  Chung-Yen Kuo,et al.  Coseismic slip of the 2010 Mw 8.8 Great Maule, Chile, earthquake quantified by the inversion of GRACE observations , 2012 .

[24]  Jeffrey P. Walker,et al.  THE GLOBAL LAND DATA ASSIMILATION SYSTEM , 2004 .

[25]  A. Eicker,et al.  Deriving daily snapshots of the Earth's gravity field from GRACE L1B data using Kalman filtering , 2009 .

[26]  J. Wahr,et al.  Computations of the viscoelastic response of a 3-D compressible Earth to surface loading: an application to Glacial Isostatic Adjustment in Antarctica and Canada , 2012 .

[27]  S. Swenson,et al.  Accuracy of GRACE mass estimates , 2006 .

[28]  S. Swenson,et al.  Post‐processing removal of correlated errors in GRACE data , 2006 .

[29]  M. Tamisiea,et al.  A statistical filtering approach for Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) gravity data , 2008 .

[30]  W. Tad Pfeffer,et al.  Recent contributions of glaciers and ice caps to sea level rise , 2012, Nature.

[31]  F. Bryan,et al.  Time variability of the Earth's gravity field: Hydrological and oceanic effects and their possible detection using GRACE , 1998 .

[32]  D. Chambers Evaluation of new GRACE time‐variable gravity data over the ocean , 2006 .

[33]  Byron D. Tapley,et al.  The 2009 exceptional Amazon flood and interannual terrestrial water storage change observed by GRACE , 2010 .

[34]  M. Watkins,et al.  GRACE Measurements of Mass Variability in the Earth System , 2004, Science.

[35]  J. Kusche Approximate decorrelation and non-isotropic smoothing of time-variable GRACE-type gravity field models , 2007 .

[36]  M. Tamisiea,et al.  On seasonal signals in geodetic time series , 2012 .

[37]  S. Swenson,et al.  Estimating signal loss in regularized GRACE gravity field solutions , 2011 .

[38]  M. Tamisiea,et al.  Using a spatially realistic load model to assess impacts of Alaskan glacier ice loss on sea level , 2011 .

[39]  Byron D. Tapley,et al.  GRACE detects coseismic and postseismic deformation from the Sumatra‐Andaman earthquake , 2007 .

[40]  C. Shum,et al.  Coseismic and postseismic deformation of the 2011 Tohoku‐Oki earthquake constrained by GRACE gravimetry , 2012 .

[41]  Frederik J. Simons,et al.  Accelerated West Antarctic ice mass loss continues to outpace East Antarctic gains , 2015 .

[42]  Remko Scharroo,et al.  Generic Mapping Tools: Improved Version Released , 2013 .

[43]  M. Tamisiea,et al.  Combination of geodetic observations and models for glacial isostatic adjustment fields in Fennoscandia , 2010 .

[44]  Jens Schröter,et al.  Measuring ocean mass variability from satellite gravimetry , 2011 .

[45]  L. P. Pellinen Estimation and application of degree variances of gravity , 1970 .

[46]  Ernst J. O. Schrama,et al.  Signal and noise in Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) observed surface mass variations , 2007 .