Anomalous events removal for automated traffic noise maps generation

Abstract Road Traffic Noise (RTN) is one of the biggest pollutants in modern cities, which is known to affect public health to be the direct cause of many illnesses for their inhabitants. Until recently, RTN maps have been generated using representative static measurements collected by experts, after manually discarding all non-traffic related noise events, or Anomalous Noise Events (ANEs). However, the automation of noise measurements using Wireless Acoustic Sensor Networks (WASNs) is allowing the development of dynamic maps, which require the detection of non-traffic noise sources in real-time in order to provide accurate noise level measurements. In this work, the manual an automatic removal of ANEs are compared. The latter is based on two versions of the Anomalous Noise Event Detector (ANED) designed to detect ANEs within a WASN in real-time as a two-class classifier. The experiments on 4 h and 44 min of real-life audio data show similar error rates among all the considered annotation methods. However, the detailed analysis of the experiments reveal, on the one hand, inconsistent manual annotations in certain non-ANE labelling situations, where non-coincident expert-based decisions are observed; and, on the other hand, the decrease of the overall accuracy of the ANED-based approaches due to the large number of false alarms in the case of RTN class. Thus, although the results demonstrate the viability of the automated removal of ANEs, further research should be conducted to keep improving the automation of ANEs annotation.

[1]  Wolfgang Babisch,et al.  Traffic Noise and Risk of Myocardial Infarction , 2005, Epidemiology.

[2]  L. J. Faus,et al.  Statistical analysis of noise levels in urban areas , 1991 .

[3]  Roberto Benocci,et al.  Anomalous noise events considerations for the computation of road traffic noise levels: The DYNAMAP's Milan case study , 2017 .

[4]  T. Chai,et al.  Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? – Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature , 2014 .

[5]  Wolfgang Babisch,et al.  Road traffic noise and cardiovascular risk. , 2008, Noise & health.

[6]  H. Miedema,et al.  Annoyance from transportation noise: relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals. , 2001, Environmental health perspectives.

[7]  C. Willmott,et al.  Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance , 2005 .

[8]  Francesc Alías,et al.  On the Impact of Anomalous Noise Events on Road Traffic Noise Mapping in Urban and Suburban Environments , 2017, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[9]  A. Ghasemi,et al.  Normality Tests for Statistical Analysis: A Guide for Non-Statisticians , 2012, International journal of endocrinology and metabolism.

[10]  Wolfgang Babisch,et al.  The quantitative relationship between road traffic noise and hypertension: a meta-analysis , 2012, Journal of hypertension.

[11]  Haibo He,et al.  Learning from Imbalanced Data , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[12]  M Bell,et al.  International scale implementation of the CNOSSOS-EU road traffic noise prediction model for epidemiological studies. , 2015, Environmental pollution.

[13]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Data clustering: a review , 1999, CSUR.

[14]  Rui Xu,et al.  Survey of clustering algorithms , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[15]  Roberto Benocci,et al.  Monitoring and Prediction of Traffic Noise in Large Urban Areas , 2018 .

[16]  Roberto Benocci,et al.  The LIFE DYNAMAP project: Towards a procedure for dynamic noise mapping in urban areas , 2017 .

[17]  A. Muzet Environmental noise, sleep and health. , 2007, Sleep medicine reviews.

[18]  Gaetano Licitra,et al.  Prioritizing Process in Action Plans: a Review of Approaches , 2017, Current Pollution Reports.

[19]  Donald W. Bouldin,et al.  A Cluster Separation Measure , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[20]  Roberto Benocci,et al.  DYNAMAP – Development of low cost sensors networks for real time noise mapping , 2016 .

[21]  Manuel Recuero López,et al.  Study of Uncertainty in Noise Mapping , 2010 .

[22]  Joan Claudi Socoró,et al.  An Anomalous Noise Events Detector for Dynamic Road Traffic Noise Mapping in Real-Life Urban and Suburban Environments , 2017, Sensors.

[23]  Markus Meis,et al.  Ambient Noise and Cognitive Processes among Primary Schoolchildren , 2003 .

[24]  P. Mermelstein,et al.  Distance measures for speech recognition, psychological and instrumental , 1976 .

[25]  Gaetano Licitra,et al.  Noise Mapping in the EU : Models and Procedures , 2012 .

[26]  Joan Claudi Socoró,et al.  Description of Anomalous Noise Events for Reliable Dynamic Traffic Noise Mapping in Real-Life Urban and Suburban Soundscapes , 2017 .

[27]  G. Licitra,et al.  A procedure for deriving wind turbine noise limits by taking into account annoyance. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[28]  Roberto Benocci,et al.  Statistical road classification applied to stratified spatial sampling of road traffic noise in urban areas , 2016 .

[29]  Gaetano Licitra,et al.  Global noise score indicator for classroom evaluation of acoustic performances in LIFE GIOCONDA project , 2016 .

[30]  S. Janssen,et al.  Long-term road traffic noise exposure is associated with an increase in morning tiredness. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  Roberto Benocci,et al.  Predicting Hourly Traflc Noise from Traflc Flow Rate Model: Underlying Concepts for the DYNAMAP Project , 2016 .

[32]  G Brambilla,et al.  Cluster categorization of urban roads to optimize their noise monitoring , 2015, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[33]  Gaetano Licitra,et al.  Limits and advantages of Good Practice Guide to Noise Mapping , 2008 .