Local and global sensitivity analysis of a tractor and single axle grain cart dynamic system model

Tractor and towed implement system models have become increasingly important for model-based guidance controller design, virtual prototyping, and operator-and-hardware-in-loop simulation. Various tractor and towed implement models have been proposed in the literature which contain uncertain or time-varying parameters. Sensitivity analysis was used to identify the effect of system parameter uncertainty/variation on system responses and to identify the most critical parameters of the lateral dynamics model for a tractor and single axle grain cart system. Both local and global sensitivity analyses were performed with respect to three tyre cornering stiffness parameters, three tyre relaxation length parameters, and two implement inertial parameters. Overall, the system was most sensitive to the tyre cornering stiffness parameters and least sensitive to the implement inertial parameters. In general, the uncertainty in the input parameters and the system output responses were related in a non-linear fashion. With the nominal parameter values for a Mechanical Front Wheel Drive (MFWD) tractor, a single axle grain cart, and maize stubble surface conditions, a 10% uncertainty in cornering stiffness parameters caused a 2% average uncertainty in the system responses whereas a 50% uncertainty in cornering stiffness parameters caused a 20% average uncertainty at 4.5 m s−1 forward velocity. If a 5% average uncertainty in system responses is acceptable, the cornering stiffness parameters must be estimated within 25% of actual/nominal values. The output uncertainty increased as the forward velocity was increased.

[1]  A. Deif Sensitivity analysis in linear systems , 1986 .

[2]  Masayoshi Tomizuka,et al.  Dynamic Modeling of Tractor-Semitrailer Vehicles in Automated Highway Systems , 1995 .

[3]  Thomas Bell Automatic tractor guidance using carrier-phase differential GPS. , 2000 .

[4]  Rajkumar Roy,et al.  Advances in Soft Computing , 2018, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[5]  István Manno,et al.  Introduction to the Monte-Carlo Method , 1999 .

[6]  Csaba Antonya,et al.  Design evaluation and modification of mechanical systems in virtual environments , 2007, Virtual Reality.

[7]  H. Raheman,et al.  Steering forces on undriven tractor wheel , 2003 .

[8]  Jo Yung Wong,et al.  Theory of ground vehicles , 1978 .

[9]  Manoj Karkee,et al.  Modeling, identification and analysis of tractor and single axle towed implement system , 2009 .

[10]  Jayantha Katupitiya,et al.  Simulation of a tractor-implement model under the influence of lateral disturbances , 2007, 2007 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[11]  Brian L. Steward,et al.  Modeling and real-time simulation architectures for virtual prototyping of off-road vehicles , 2009, Virtual Reality.

[12]  Bradford W. Parkinson,et al.  A New Yaw Dynamic Model for Improved High Speed Control of a Farm Tractor , 2002 .

[13]  Max D. Morris,et al.  Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments , 1991 .

[14]  Ilya M. Sobol,et al.  Sensitivity Estimates for Nonlinear Mathematical Models , 1993 .

[15]  Jay T. Akridge,et al.  2008 PRECISION AGRICULTURAL SERVICES DEALERSHIP SURVEY RESULTS , 2008 .

[16]  E. R. Benson,et al.  GUIDANCE CONTROL OF AGRICULTURAL VEHICLES AT HIGH FIELD SPEEDS , 1999 .

[17]  George Z. Gertner,et al.  Extending a global sensitivity analysis technique to models with correlated parameters , 2007, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[18]  John H. Seinfeld,et al.  Global sensitivity analysis—a computational implementation of the Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test (FAST) , 1982 .

[19]  C. Fortuin,et al.  Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients. I Theory , 1973 .

[20]  Roger Fales Robust control design for an electrohydraulic wheel loader system with a human-in-the-loop assessment in a virtual environment , 2004 .

[21]  A. Saltelli,et al.  A quantitative model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output , 1999 .

[22]  Chang-Soo Han,et al.  Dynamic sensitivity analysis for the pantograph of a high-speed rail vehicle , 2003 .

[23]  Thomas Ertl,et al.  Analyzing Engineering Simulations in a Virtual Environment , 1998, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[24]  Carlos L. Castillo,et al.  Modeling and visualization of multiple autonomous heterogeneous vehicles , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[25]  Yiannis E. Papelis,et al.  Driving simulation: challenges for VR technology , 1996, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[26]  Weiwen Deng,et al.  Parametric Study on Vehicle-Trailer Dynamics for Stability Control , 2003 .

[27]  Jayantha Katupitiya,et al.  Precision Autonomous Guidance of Agricultural Vehicles for Future Autonomous Farming , 2008 .

[28]  Z. Wójcicki,et al.  Sensitivity analysis applied to a dynamic railroad model , 2003 .

[29]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Uncertainty and global sensitivity analysis of road transport emission estimates , 2004 .

[30]  G. Krick Behaviour of tyres driven in soft ground with side slip , 1973 .

[31]  Hui Fang,et al.  Development of Trajectory Model for a Tractor-Implement System for Automated Navigation Applications , 2005, 2005 IEEE Instrumentationand Measurement Technology Conference Proceedings.

[32]  Judy M. Vance,et al.  Desktop haptic virtual assembly using physically based modelling , 2007, Virtual Reality.

[33]  H. Schwanghart,et al.  Lateral forces on steered tyres in loose soil , 1968 .

[34]  D. A. Crolla,et al.  A review of the combined lateral and longitudinal force generation of tyres on deformable surfaces , 1987 .

[35]  Jin Hee Jang,et al.  The state sensitivity analysis of the front wheel steering vehicle: In the time domain , 1997 .

[36]  L. Daniel Metz,et al.  Dynamics of Four-Wheel-Steer Off-Highway Vehicles , 1993 .

[37]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis: tools for GIS-based model implementation , 2001, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[38]  Julio R. Banga,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis of a Biochemical Pathway Model , 2008, IWPACBB.

[39]  Constantinos C. Pantelides,et al.  Monte Carlo evaluation of derivative-based global sensitivity measures , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[40]  Manoj Karkee,et al.  Study of the open and closed loop characteristics of a tractor and a single axle towed implement system , 2010 .

[41]  I. Sobola,et al.  Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates , 2001 .

[42]  Manoj Karkee,et al.  Open and Closed Loop System Characteristics of a Tractor and an Implement Dynamic Model , 2008 .