Mapping molecular HLA typing data to UNOS antigen equivalents for improved virtual crossmatch

BACKGROUND Histocompatibility labs must convert molecular HLA typing data to antigen equivalencies for entry into the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) UNet system. While an Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) policy document provides general guidelines for conversion, the process is complex because no antigen mapping table is available. We present a UNOS antigen equivalency table for all IPD-IMGT/HLA alleles at the A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3/4/5, DQA1, and DQB1 loci. METHODS An automated script was developed to generate a UNOS antigen equivalency table. Data sources used in the conversion algorithm included the World Marrow Donor Association (WMDA) antigen table, the HLA Dictionary, and UNOS-provided tables. To validate antigen mappings, we converted National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) high resolution allele frequencies to antigen equivalents and compared with the UNOS Calculated Panel Reactive Antibodies (CPRA) reference panel. RESULTS Normalized frequency similarity scores between independent NMDP and UNOS panels for 4 US population categories (Caucasian, Hispanic, African American and Asian/Pacific Islander) ranged from 0.85 to 0.97, indicating correct antigen mapping. An open source web application (ALLele to ANtigen ("ALLAN")) and web services were also developed to map unambiguous and ambiguous HLA typing data to UNOS antigen equivalents based on NMDP population-specific allele frequencies (http://www.transplanttoolbox.org). CONCLUSIONS Computer-assisted interpretation of molecular HLA data may aid in reducing typing discrepancies in UNet. This work also sets a foundation for molecular typing data to be utilized directly in the UNet match run as well as the virtual crossmatch process at transplant centers.

[1]  Steven G E Marsh Nomenclature for factors of the HLA system, update May 2017. , 2017, Human immunology.

[2]  S G E Marsh,et al.  Genotype List String: a grammar for describing HLA and KIR genotyping results in a text string , 2013, Tissue antigens.

[3]  Matthias Niemann,et al.  Computational Approaches to Facilitate Epitope-Based HLA Matching in Solid Organ Transplantation , 2017, Journal of immunology research.

[4]  S G E Marsh Nomenclature for factors of the HLA system, update May 2017 , 2017, HLA.

[5]  M Setterholm,et al.  Use of a neural network to assign serologic specificities to HLA-A, -B and -DRB1 allelic products. , 2003, Tissue antigens.

[6]  W. Bodmer,et al.  Nomenclature for factors of the HLA system, 2010 , 2010, Tissue antigens.

[7]  S G E Marsh,et al.  An update to the HLA Nomenclature Guidelines of the World Marrow Donor Association, 2012 , 2013, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[8]  Jeffrey T. Sholander,et al.  Using real data for a virtual crossmatch. , 2009, Human immunology.

[9]  L. Excoffier,et al.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of molecular haplotype frequencies in a diploid population. , 1995, Molecular biology and evolution.

[10]  Michael Heuer,et al.  Histoimmunogenetics Markup Language 1.0: Reporting next generation sequencing-based HLA and KIR genotyping. , 2015, Human immunology.

[11]  Malek Kamoun,et al.  The new KAS: Challenges and opportunities. , 2017, Human immunology.

[12]  Mary S Leffell,et al.  The calculated panel reactive antibody policy: an advancement improving organ allocation , 2011, Current opinion in organ transplantation.

[13]  R. Bray,et al.  The New Kidney Allocation System (KAS) and the Highly Sensitized Patient: Expect the Unexpected , 2014, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[14]  A. Kirk,et al.  The New OPTN Kidney Allocation Policy: Potential for Inequitable Access Among Highly Sensitized Patients , 2015, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[15]  Loren Gragert,et al.  Six-locus high resolution HLA haplotype frequencies derived from mixed-resolution DNA typing for the entire US donor registry. , 2013, Human immunology.

[16]  R. Blasczyk,et al.  Immunogenetics of HLA null alleles: implications for blood stem cell transplantation. , 2004, Tissue antigens.

[17]  T Taber,et al.  OPO Strategies to Prevent Unintended Use of Kidneys Exported for High PRA (>98% cPRA) Recipients , 2017, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[18]  James Robinson,et al.  The IPD and IMGT/HLA database: allele variant databases , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..

[19]  Cesare Pautasso,et al.  RESTful Web Services: Principles, Patterns and Emerging Technologies , 2013 .

[20]  J. McCluskey,et al.  Nomenclature and Serology of HLA Class I and Class II Alleles , 2017, Current protocols in immunology.

[21]  S G Marsh,et al.  The HLA dictionary 2001: a summary of HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1/3/4/5, -DQB1 alleles and their association with serologically defined HLA-A, -B, -C, -DR, and -DQ antigens. , 2001, Human immunology.

[22]  C. Darke,et al.  A novel HLA‐B*14 allele – B*14:53 – genetics and serology , 2016, International journal of immunogenetics.

[23]  Steven G.E. Marsh,et al.  Nomenclature for factors of the HLA system , 1975 .

[24]  Robert A. Bray,et al.  P053 Evaluation of discrepant deceased donor HLA typings reported in UNET , 2017 .

[25]  C Darke,et al.  HLA‐B*15:33, a rare allele whose product reacts as an HLA‐B62 and ‐Cw5/Cw8 specificity , 2012, International journal of immunogenetics.

[26]  C Darke,et al.  Epitopes and motifs of the HLA‐B*14 allele family products and related HLA‐B14 cross‐reactive specificities , 2017, International journal of immunogenetics.

[27]  P. Nickerson,et al.  Strategic Use of Epitope Matching to Improve Outcomes , 2016, Transplantation.

[28]  M Setterholm,et al.  Hematopoietic stem cell donor registry strategies for assigning search determinants and matching relationships , 2004, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[29]  J. Friedewald,et al.  Perception Versus Reality?: Virtual Crossmatch—How to Overcome Some of the Technical and Logistic Limitations , 2009 .