Changes in 18F-FDG Uptake Within Minutes After Chemotherapy in a Rabbit VX2 Tumor Model

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether 18F-FDG PET/CT can be used for in vivo chemosensitivity testing and to determine the optimal time point for observation. Methods: Forty-two rabbits with 84 implanted VX2 squamous cell tumors were randomized into a control group (n = 10) and a treatment group (n = 32). 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed the day before intravenous administration of cisplatin (4 mg/kg) and at 95–100 min (day 0), day 1, day 7, and day 14 afterward. In the control group, 18F-FDG PET/CT images were acquired at the same time points but without cisplatin administration. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) and mean SUV were analyzed. On the basis of tumor volume, we categorized animal tumors into a sensitive group and an insensitive group. If tumor volume doubled by day 7, the tumor was considered insensitive. Results: On day 0, maximum SUV and mean SUV were significantly different between the sensitive group and the insensitive and control groups (P < 0.05 for both). In the sensitive group, the average change from the pretherapy values was −48.96% ± 12.27% for maximum SUV and −51.63% ± 10.45% for mean SUV. SUV did not significantly differ between the groups at any other points (days 1–14). On day 0, tumor volume was not significantly different between the control group and the sensitive or insensitive groups. After cisplatin administration, the size of the VX2 xenograft tumors increased slowly. Tumor necrosis fractions on days 7 and 14 were significantly greater in the sensitive group than in the insensitive or control group. Viable tumor cells on days 7 and 14 were less numerous in the sensitive group than in the insensitive or control group. A significant difference in inflammatory cells was seen between the sensitive and insensitive groups on days 7 and 14 (P < 0.05 for both). No significant differences in inflammatory cells or viable tumor cells were seen between the insensitive and control groups at any time points from before therapy to day 14 (P > 0.05 for all). A slight increase in viable tumor cells and inflammatory cells was seen in the sensitive group on day 14, compared with day 7. Conclusion: When 18F-FDG was injected as early as 40 min after administration of chemotherapy, PET showed significantly decreased in vivo uptake of the tracer in chemoresponsive tumors. This finding suggests that 18F-FDG PET may be able to discriminate sensitive from insensitive tumors if the imaging is performed immediately after a test dose of chemotherapy. The optimal observation time and methodology for various chemotherapy–tumor combinations will need to be studied to confirm whether this approach can be generalized.

[1]  E. Cressman,et al.  The effect of benzamide riboside on the VX2 model of liver cancer in rabbits. , 2005, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[2]  Y. Nishiyama,et al.  Correlation of FDG-PET findings with histopathology in the assessment of response to induction chemoradiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer , 2006, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[3]  M. Miyazaki,et al.  Effects of Irradiation Combined with Cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (CDDP) Suppository in Rabbit VX2 Rectal Tumors , 2005, World Journal of Surgery.

[4]  Y. Nishiyama,et al.  Usefulness of FDG-PET imaging for the radiotherapy treatment planning of pyothorax-associated lymphoma , 2005, Annals of nuclear medicine.

[5]  Wolfgang A Weber,et al.  Prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy by sequential F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Metabolic imaging predicts response, survival, and recurrence in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  T. Yen,et al.  Positron emission tomography in gynecologic cancer. , 2006, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[8]  Yasuyoshi Watanabe,et al.  Usefulness of FDG-microPET for early evaluation of therapeutic effects on VX2 rabbit carcinoma , 2006, Annals of nuclear medicine.

[9]  D. Yan,et al.  Correlating metabolic and anatomic responses of primary lung cancers to radiotherapy by combined F-18 FDG PET-CT imaging , 2007, Radiation oncology.

[10]  Y. Magata,et al.  Evaluation of experimental liver tumors using fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  Michael E. Phelps,et al.  Monitoring Tumor Glucose Utilization by Positron Emission Tomography for the Prediction of Treatment Response to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Kinase Inhibitors , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[12]  J. Leonard,et al.  FDG‐PET after 1 cycle of therapy predicts outcome in diffuse large cell lymphoma and classic Hodgkin disease , 2006, Cancer.

[13]  J. Lee,et al.  The Clinical Usefulness of 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in the Differential Diagnosis, Staging, and Response Evaluation After Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer , 2006, Journal of clinical gastroenterology.

[14]  S. Marnitz,et al.  Value of 18F-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-d-Glucose-Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer for Prediction of Pathologic Response and Times to Relapse after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[15]  D. Newell,et al.  Revisions of general guidelines for the preclinical toxicology of new cytotoxic anticancer agents in Europe. The Cancer Research Campaign (CRC) Phase I/II Clinical Trials Committee and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) New Drug Development Office. , 1995, European journal of cancer.

[16]  Matthias Reimold,et al.  18F-FDG PET for assessment of therapy response and preoperative re-evaluation after neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy in stage III non-small cell lung cancer , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[17]  E. Yoshikawa,et al.  Early therapy monitoring with FDG-PET in aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and Hodgkin’s lymphoma , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[18]  T. Davidson,et al.  The rabbit as an experimental model for regional chemotherapy 2. Isolated perfusion of hindlimbs , 1986, Laboratory animals.

[19]  R. Weissleder Molecular Imaging in Cancer , 2006, Science.

[20]  A. Rahmouni,et al.  Value of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in managing patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 2006, Clinical lymphoma & myeloma.

[21]  Fiona J. Gilbert,et al.  Monitoring primary breast cancer throughout chemotherapy using FDG-PET , 2007, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[22]  T. Nonaka,et al.  Prediction of response to definitive chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer using positron emission tomography. , 2007, Anticancer research.

[23]  Ludovic Ferrer,et al.  Monitoring of early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II and III breast cancer by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  T. Chen,et al.  Early restaging whole-body 18F-FDG PET during induction chemotherapy predicts clinical outcome in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[25]  G. Orth,et al.  Two Shope papillomavirus-associated VX2 carcinoma cell lines with different levels of keratinocyte differentiation and transplantability , 1985, Journal of virology.

[26]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Prediction of response to preoperative chemotherapy in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction by metabolic imaging. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  A. Tardivon,et al.  Monitoring therapeutic efficacy in breast carcinomas , 2006, European Radiology.

[28]  Christoph Alexiou,et al.  Delivery of superparamagnetic nanoparticles for local chemotherapy after intraarterial infusion and magnetic drug targeting. , 2007, Anticancer research.

[29]  F. Valette,et al.  FDG-PET/CT predicts outcome in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and Hodgkin’s disease , 2006, Annals of Hematology.