Safety of repeated sessions of galvanic vestibular stimulation following stroke: A single-case study

Primary objective: Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) involves the delivery of small electrical current to the part of the scalp that overlies the vestibular nerves. A single, brief session transiently reduces certain types of stroke impairment with no reported side-effects. It is anticipated that further reductions will occur if the duration and frequency of stimulation is increased. The aim of the present study was to assess whether this increased exposure is well-tolerated and consistent with patient well-being. Methods and procedures: GVS was administered to a stroke sufferer on 5 consecutive days, each for 30 minutes at an intensity of 1 milliamp. Tolerability was monitored via a range of behavioural scales sensitive to side-effects experienced during and after stimulation. Results: No unpleasant sensations were reported during stimulation and no deterioration in global function was observed over the 5-day period. Conclusion: The results imply that repeated applications of GVS are tolerable at the parameter settings applied and provide the basis for larger-scale investigations of safety and efficacy.

[1]  T. Inglis,et al.  The effects of vestibular stimulaton on hemineglect: implications for rehabilitation , 1997 .

[2]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. , 1987, Physical therapy.

[3]  M. Post,et al.  Measuring nursing needs of stroke patients in clinical rehabilitation: a comparison of validity and sensitivity to change between the Northwick Park Dependency Score and the Barthel Index , 2002, Clinical rehabilitation.

[4]  Philip C. Ko,et al.  Improvement of a face perception deficit via subsensory galvanic vestibular stimulation , 2005, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[5]  C. Marquardt,et al.  Repetitive optokinetic stimulation induces lasting recovery from visual neglect. , 2006, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[6]  Idil Cavus,et al.  Slow transcranial magnetic stimulation, long-term depotentiation, and brain hyperexcitability disorders. , 2002, The American journal of psychiatry.

[7]  N. Schiff,et al.  Does vestibular stimulation activate thalamocortical mechanisms that reintegrate impaired cortical regions? , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  Berthold Langguth,et al.  Long-Term Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in Patients with Chronic Tinnitus , 2005, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[9]  A. Antal,et al.  Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients , 2007, Brain Research Bulletin.

[10]  Lynne Turner-Stokes,et al.  The Northwick Park Dependency Score (NPDS): a measure of nursing dependency in rehabilitation , 1998, Clinical rehabilitation.

[11]  J. Lagopoulos,et al.  Feeling the heat: the electrode–skin interface during DCS , 2008, Acta Neuropsychiatrica.

[12]  D.B. McCreery,et al.  Charge density and charge per phase as cofactors in neural injury induced by electrical stimulation , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  T. Brandt,et al.  Multisensory cortical signal increases and decreases during vestibular galvanic stimulation (fMRI). , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  John C. Rothwell,et al.  Long-term reorganization of human motor cortex driven by short-term sensory stimulation , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  Alan D. Miller,et al.  Vestibular effects on upper airway musculature , 1996, Brain Research.

[16]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  E. Bisiach,et al.  Improving Neglect by TMS , 2006, Behavioural neurology.

[18]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Recent advances in the treatment of chronic pain with non-invasive brain stimulation techniques , 2007, The Lancet Neurology.

[19]  B. Johansson,et al.  Reduction of visuo-spatial neglect with vestibular galvanic stimulation. , 1999, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[20]  Frank Padberg,et al.  Skin lesions after treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[21]  Lynne Turner-Stokes,et al.  The UK FIM+FAM: development and evaluation , 1999 .

[22]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Repeated sessions of noninvasive brain DC stimulation is associated with motor function improvement in stroke patients. , 2007, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[23]  E. Bisiach,et al.  Remission of hemineglect and anosognosia during vestibular stimulation , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  O. Blanke,et al.  In X uence of galvanic vestibular stimulation on egocentric and object-based mental transformations , 2022 .

[25]  A. Coats.  Limit of Normal of the Galvanic Body-Sway Test , 1972, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[26]  K. Berg.  Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument , 1989 .

[27]  G. Goldenberg,et al.  Neck muscle vibration induces lasting recovery in spatial neglect , 2002, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.