Studies on the Behavior of Single and Group of Geosynthetic Encased Stone Columns

The stone columns (or granular piles) are increasingly being used as ground reinforcement elements for supporting a wide variety of structures including buildings and flexible structures. The stone columns derive their load capacity from the confinement offered by the surrounding soil. In very soft soils this lateral confinement may not be adequate and the formation of the stone column itself may be doubtful. Wrapping the individual stone columns with suitable geosynthetic is one of the ideal forms of improving the performance of stone columns. This type of encasement by geosynthetic makes the stone columns stiffer and stronger. In addition, encasement prevents the lateral squeezing of stones in to the surrounding clay soil and vice versa, preserves drainage function of the stone column and frictional properties of the aggregates. In spite of many advantages, the behavior and the mechanism of the geosynthetic encased stone columns is not thoroughly understood. This paper investigates the qualitative and quantitative improvement of individual load capacity of stone column by encasement through laboratory model tests conducted on stone columns installed in clay bed prepared in controlled condition in a large scale testing tank. The load tests were performed on single as well as group of stone columns with and without encasement. Tests were performed with different geosynthetics for the encasement of stone column. The results from the load tests indicated a clear improvement in the load capacity of the stone column due to encasement. The increase in the axial load capacity depends very much upon the modulus of the encasement and the diameter of the stone column. The increase in the stress concentration on the stone columns due to encasement was also measured in the tests. The results from the tests were used to develop the design guidelines for the design of geosynthetic encasement for the given load and settlement.

[1]  G. N. Pande,et al.  Analysis of stone-column reinforced foundations , 1998 .

[2]  D. Muir Wood,et al.  Group effects in stone column foundations: model tests , 2000 .

[3]  Vinayagamoothy Sivakumar,et al.  Reinforced Stone Columns in Weak Deposits: Laboratory Model Study , 2007 .

[4]  K. Rajagopal,et al.  Shear Load Tests on Stone Columns With and Without Geosynthetic Encasement , 2009 .

[5]  D. J. Henkel,et al.  The Effect Measured of the Rubber Membrane on the Triaxial Compression Strength of Clay Samples , 1952 .

[6]  H. J. Priebe,et al.  Design of vibro replacement , 1996 .

[7]  Hans-Georg Kempfert,et al.  Excavations and Foundations in Soft Soils , 2006 .

[8]  J. M. O. Hughes,et al.  A field trial of the reinforcing effect of a stone column in soil , 1975 .

[9]  M. Bouassida,et al.  Improved soft clay characteristics due to stone column installation , 2007 .

[10]  K. Rajagopal,et al.  Geosynthetic-encased stone columns: Numerical evaluation , 2006 .

[11]  Adel Hanna,et al.  Encapsulated stone columns as a soil improvement technique for collapsible soil , 2005 .

[12]  S. N. Malarvizhi,et al.  COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE BEHAVIOR OF ENCASED STONE COLUMN AND CONVENTIONAL STONE COLUMN , 2007 .

[13]  Van Impe,et al.  Soil Improvement Techniques and Their Evolution , 1989 .

[14]  J. M. Mckenna,et al.  Performance of an embankment supported by stone columns in soft ground , 1975 .

[15]  N. P. Balaam,et al.  Analysis of rigid rafts supported by granular piles , 1981 .

[16]  P. de Buhan,et al.  Bearing capacity of a foundation resting on a soil reinforced by a group of columns , 1995 .

[17]  S N Rao,et al.  STUDIES ON GROUPS OF STONE COLUMNS IN SOFT CLAYS , 1997 .