Gaussian Processes with OAD Covariance Function for Hyperspectral Data Classification

A new method is presented which combines a deterministic analytical method and a probabilistic measure to classify rock types on the basis of their hyperspectral curve shape. This method is a supervised learning algorithm using Gaussian Processes (GPs) and the Observation Angle Dependent (OAD) covariance function. The OAD covariance function makes use of the properties of the Spectral Angle Mapper (SAM) which is used frequently for classifying hyperspectral data. Results show that it is possible to identify and classify rocks in an ‘One vs. One’ and an ‘One vs. All’ approach using the entire spectral curve (0.35-2.5 microm). The results show an average classification accuracy of 98% and an F-score of 92% for the new method in an ‘One vs. All’ approach. Slightly higher classification accuracy and F-measure for the new method can be achieved for the ‘One vs. One’ binary approach. This paper extends the ideas of the deterministic SAM method to a probabilistic framework and enables data fusion with similar and disparate kinds of sensors. This paper demonstrates a superior classification performance of the new probabilistic method over the classical SAM.

[1]  J. K. Crowley,et al.  Airborne imaging spectrometer data of the Ruby Mountains, Montana: Mineral discrimination using relative absorption band-depth images , 1989 .

[2]  Farid Melgani,et al.  Gaussian Process Approach to Remote Sensing Image Classification , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  R. Clark,et al.  High spectral resolution reflectance spectroscopy of minerals , 1990 .

[4]  G. Hunt SPECTRAL SIGNATURES OF PARTICULATE MINERALS IN THE VISIBLE AND NEAR INFRARED , 1977 .

[5]  Harald van der Werff,et al.  Assessing the Influence of Reference Spectra on Synthetic SAM Classification Results , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[6]  Eric Nettleton,et al.  An Observation Angle Dependent Nonstationary Covariance Function for Gaussian Process Regression , 2009, ICONIP.

[7]  A F Goetz,et al.  Imaging Spectrometry for Earth Remote Sensing , 1985, Science.

[8]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 2011 .

[9]  Yuntao Qian,et al.  Band selection based gaussian processes for hyperspectral remote sensing images classification , 2009, 2009 16th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[10]  Mohd. Noor Md. Sap,et al.  Composite Kernels for Support Vector Classification of Hyper-Spectral Data , 2008, MICAI.

[11]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Recent Advances in Techniques for Hyperspectral Image Processing , 2009 .

[12]  F. Meer Analysis of spectral absorption features in hyperspectral imagery , 2004 .

[13]  Fred A. Kruse,et al.  The Spectral Image Processing System (SIPS) - Interactive visualization and analysis of imaging spectrometer data , 1993 .

[14]  S. J. Sutley,et al.  Imaging spectroscopy: Earth and planetary remote sensing with the USGS Tetracorder and expert systems , 2003 .

[15]  Sildomar T. Monteiro,et al.  On the development of a hyperspectral library for autonomous mining systems , 2009 .

[16]  Erick Ramanaidou,et al.  Measurement of the hematite:goethite ratio using field visible and near‐infrared reflectance spectrometry in channel iron deposits, Western Australia , 1997 .

[17]  F. Meer The effectiveness of spectral similarity measures for the analysis of hyperspectral imagery , 2006 .