Time-domain impedance boundary condition for outdoor sound propagation numerical simulations

In the context of transportation noise, acoustic sources are usually broadband and in motion, and the propagation environment can be complex, with various types of ground, wind and temperature fluctuations, and topographic effects. Finite-difference time-domain methods are particularly well suited to deal with these different aspects. In this paper, time-domain boundary conditions (TDBCs) are considered for different impedance models classically used for outdoor grounds. These impedance models have usually been obtained in the frequency domain, and they don't necessarily meet the causality, reality and passivity conditions for a model to be translated into the time domain. Furthermore, when it is possible to derive a TDBC, a convolution must be solved, which is not efficient from a numerical point of view. The TDBC that is presented here is based on the approximation of the impedance as a sum of well chosen template functions. The approximation process can be performed in the frequency domain or in the time domain. Thanks to the forms of the template functions, the recursive convolution technique can be applied; this is a fast and computationally efficient method to calculate a discrete convolution. The TDBC is validated using a linearized Euler equations solver in one- and three-dimensional geometries; comparisons with analytical solutions in the time and frequency domains are presented. The methods used to identify the coefficients of the template functions are shown to be of great i mportance. Indeed, the numerical simulations become inaccurate when the values of the poles of the template functions are large with respect to the time step. Thus, a constraint on the values of the poles must be included in the coefficients identification methods to obtain accurate solutions.

[1]  Wim Desmet,et al.  Time-Domain Impedance Formulation suited for Broadband Simulations , 2007 .

[2]  P. Blanc-Benon,et al.  Estimates of the relevant turbulent scales for acoustic propagation in an upward refracting atmosphere , 2007 .

[3]  Y. Berthelot,et al.  Surface acoustic impedance and causality. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Vladimir E Ostashev,et al.  Padé approximation in time-domain boundary conditions of porous surfaces. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Christopher K. W. Tam,et al.  Time-Domain Impedance Boundary Conditions for Computational Aeroacoustics , 1996 .

[6]  Keith Attenborough,et al.  On the acoustic slow wave in air-filled granular media , 1987 .

[7]  C. Zwikker,et al.  Sound Absorbing Materials , 1949 .

[8]  D. Heimann,et al.  Eulerian Time-Domain Model for Sound Propagation over a Finite-Impedance Ground Surface. Comparison with Frequency-Domain Models , 2002 .

[9]  C. Bogey Three-dimensional non-refrective boundary conditions for acoustic simulation : far field formulation and validation test cases , 2002 .

[10]  D. Wilson,et al.  Time-domain calculations of sound interactions with outdoor ground surfaces , 2007 .

[11]  Mei Zhuang,et al.  Three-dimensional benchmark problem for broadband time-domain impedance boundary conditions , 2004 .

[12]  D. Sullivan,et al.  On the dispersion errors related to (FD)/sup 2/TD type schemes , 1995 .

[13]  C. Tam,et al.  RADIATION AND OUTFLOW BOUNDARY CONDITIONS FOR DIRECT COMPUTATION OF ACOUSTIC AND FLOW DISTURBANCES IN A NONUNIFORM MEAN FLOW , 1996 .

[14]  S. Rienstra Impedance Models in Time Domain including the Extended Helmholtz Resonator Model , 2006 .

[15]  M. R. Stinson,et al.  POROUS ROAD PAVEMENTS : ACOUSTICAL CHARACTERIZATION AND PROPAGATION EFFECTS , 1997 .

[16]  Maurice Roseau,et al.  Asymptotic Wave Theory , 1975 .

[17]  Yusuf Özyörük,et al.  A time-domain implementation of surface acoustic impedance condition with and without flow , 1996 .

[18]  R. J. Luebbers,et al.  Piecewise linear recursive convolution for dispersive media using FDTD , 1996 .

[19]  Irene A. Stegun,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions. , 1966 .

[20]  K. B. Rasmussen Sound propagation over grass covered ground , 1981 .

[21]  E. N. Bazley,et al.  Acoustical properties of fibrous absorbent materials , 1970 .

[22]  C. Bogey,et al.  A family of low dispersive and low dissipative explicit schemes for flow and noise computations , 2004 .

[23]  A. Semlyen,et al.  Rational approximation of frequency domain responses by vector fitting , 1999 .

[24]  L. Dallois Long Range Sound Propagation in a Turbulent Atmosphere Within the Parabolic Approximation , 2001 .

[25]  Hongbin Ju,et al.  Broadband Time-Domain Impedance Models , 2001 .

[26]  P. Morse,et al.  Methods of theoretical physics , 1955 .

[27]  C. Chessell Propagation of noise along a finite impedance boundary , 1977 .

[28]  Sw Sjoerd Rienstra,et al.  1-D reflection at an impedance wall , 1988 .

[29]  Raymond J. Luebbers,et al.  FDTD for Nth-order dispersive media , 1992 .

[30]  Generalized analysis of stability and numerical dispersion in the discrete-convolution FDTD method , 2000 .

[31]  R. Luebbers,et al.  Debye Function Expansions of Complex Permittivity Using a Hybrid Particle Swarm-Least Squares Optimization Approach , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[32]  Y. Miki Acoustical Properties of porous materials : Modifications of Delany-Bazley models , 1990 .

[33]  Sandra L. Collier,et al.  Time-domain modeling of the acoustic impedance of porous surfaces , 2006 .