[Does Induction of Labor for Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes at 34 Weeks of Gestation Increase the Risk for Cesarean Section?]

PURPOSE Induction of labor at 34 weeks of gestation is often linked to increased risk for cesarean section. Recently, the PPROMT trial demonstrated a higher cesarean section rate when labor was induced for preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). The purpose of this study was therefore to evaluate the success rate of induction of labor for PPROM at 34 and 35 weeks of gestation in comparison with a higher gestational age. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this historic cohort study, cases with labor inductions for PPROM ≥ 34 weeks of gestation were included. Induction of labor at 34 and 35 weeks of gestation (group 1) were compared with those performed at 36 weeks (group 2) and 37 weeks (group 3). Induction of labor was started 12 to 24 hours after (preterm) premature rupture of membranes. Antibiotics were given routinely. The primary outcome was the rate of cesarean section. RESULTS There were significantly more cesarean sections in group 3 in comparison with group 2 (7 vs. 25%, p=0.0136). However, univariable and multiple logistic regression analysis of the primary outcome measure showed that there was no impact of the group affiliation on cesarean section rate. Significant parameters influencing the risk of cesarean section were body mass index and Bishop score. CONCLUSION Induction of labor for PPROM at 34 weeks of gestation is not associated with an increased rate of cesarean section.

[1]  I. Hösli,et al.  Prävention und Therapie der Frühgeburt , 2019 .

[2]  A. Seidler,et al.  Immediate Delivery Compared With Expectant Management in Late Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: An Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis. , 2018, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  M. Beckmann,et al.  Effect of Premature Rupture of Membranes on Induction of Labor: A Historical Cohort Study , 2017, Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde.

[4]  P. Middleton,et al.  Planned early birth versus expectant management for women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes prior to 37 weeks' gestation for improving pregnancy outcome. , 2017, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[5]  J. Thornton,et al.  Immediate delivery compared with expectant management after preterm pre-labour rupture of the membranes close to term (PPROMT trial): a randomised controlled trial , 2016, The Lancet.

[6]  B. Mol,et al.  Management of late-preterm premature rupture of membranes: the PPROMEXIL-2 trial. , 2012, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  B. Mol,et al.  Induction of Labor versus Expectant Management in Women with Preterm Prelabor Rupture of Membranes between 34 and 37 Weeks: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2012, PLoS medicine.

[8]  P. Middleton,et al.  Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more). , 2006, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[9]  M. Dombrowski,et al.  The Preterm Prediction Study: prediction of preterm premature rupture of membranes through clinical findings and ancillary testing. The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. , 2000, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  K. Leveno,et al.  The Natural History of Preterm Ruptured Membranes: What to Expect of Expectant Management , 1988, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  A. Lembet Premature rupture of the membranes. , 1979, British medical journal.

[12]  D. Mishell,et al.  Premature rupture of the fetal membranes. A review. , 1970, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.