Speech perception in gated noise: the effects of temporal resolution.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] S. Bacon,et al. The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[2] P M Zurek,et al. Consonant reception in noise by listeners with mild and moderate sensorineural hearing impairment. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[3] L. Robles,et al. Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[4] J M Festen. Contributions of comodulation masking release and temporal resolution to the speech-reception threshold masked by an interfering voice. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[5] H. Levitt. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[6] R L Freyman,et al. Temporal resolution in sensorineural hearing-impaired listeners. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[7] Peggy B Nelson,et al. Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[8] Dianne J. Van Tasell,et al. Hearing Loss, Speech, and Hearing Aids , 1993 .
[9] R. Plomp,et al. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[10] L. Feth,et al. Temporal integration of forward masking in listeners having sensorineural hearing loss. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[11] C L Mackersie,et al. The role of sequential stream segregation and frequency selectivity in the perception of simultaneous sentences by listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. , 2001, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[12] Jayne B Ahlstrom,et al. Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[13] D D Dirks,et al. Speech recognition in amplitude-modulated noise of listeners with normal and listeners with impaired hearing. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[14] D D Dirks,et al. Auditory filter characteristics and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[15] Thomas Baer,et al. Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing‐impaired and normally hearing people , 1997 .
[16] J. C. Steinberg,et al. Factors Governing the Intelligibility of Speech Sounds , 1945 .
[17] B. Moore,et al. Growth of forward masking for sinusoidal and noise maskers as a function of signal delay; implications for suppression in noise. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[18] H. Gustafsson,et al. Masking of speech by amplitude-modulated noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[19] A. Oxenham,et al. A behavioral measure of basilar-membrane nonlinearity in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[20] G. A. Miller,et al. The Intelligibility of Interrupted Speech , 1948 .
[21] C V Pavlovic,et al. An articulation index based procedure for predicting the speech recognition performance of hearing-impaired individuals. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[22] Stuart Rosen,et al. THE PERCEPTION OF SPEECH IN FLUCTUATING NOISE , 1993 .