Systemic Thrombolysis Versus Device Exchange for Pump Thrombosis Management: A Single-Center Experience

In patients with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implants, pump thrombosis is a potential life-threatening complication. In a retrospective data analysis, we compared clinical outcomes in 50 patients with HeartWare (HW) or HeartMate II implants undergoing device exchange (DEx; n = 21) or systemic thrombolysis (STL; n = 29) for pump thrombosis. Primary end-point was survival up to 90 days postintervention. Secondary end-points were the need for blood products postintervention, duration of intensive care unit stay, in-hospital stay, 90 day and 2 year therapy failure (the need for additional surgical or nonsurgical intervention because of pump thrombosis), and 2 year survival. Ninety-day survival was 89.3% in the STL group and 91.0% in the DEx group (p = 0.901). Compared with the DEx group, the average use of different blood products was lower (p < 0.001), and duration of intensive care unit stay and in-hospital stay tended to be shorter in the STL group (p values = 0.086 and 0.048, respectively). However, 90 day freedom from therapy failure was significantly lower in the STL group than in the DEx exchange group (p = 0.027) and so was 2 year freedom from therapy failure (p = 0.006). Two-year survival was comparable between groups (p = 0.267). Our data indicate that STL can be considered as a therapeutic option in LVAD patients with pump thrombosis.

[1]  E. Hohner,et al.  Medication management for left ventricular assist device thrombosis. , 2015, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

[2]  Robert L Kormos,et al.  Sixth INTERMACS annual report: a 10,000-patient database. , 2014, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[3]  G. Felker,et al.  Thrombolytic therapy for thrombosis of continuous flow ventricular assist devices. , 2014, Journal of cardiac failure.

[4]  G. Ailawadi,et al.  Diagnosis, Nonsurgical Management, and Prevention of LVAD Thrombosis , 2014, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[5]  N. Uriel,et al.  Continuous-flow left ventricular assist device exchange: clinical outcomes. , 2014, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[6]  Nader Moazami,et al.  An analysis of pump thrombus events in patients in the HeartWare ADVANCE bridge to transplant and continued access protocol trial. , 2014, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[7]  Sean Pinney,et al.  Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) analysis of pump thrombosis in the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device. , 2014, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[8]  J. Ferro,et al.  Systemic Thrombolysis for Cerebral Venous and Dural Sinus Thrombosis: A Systematic Review , 2013, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[9]  S. Pinney,et al.  Failed repeated thrombolysis requiring left ventricular assist device pump exchange , 2013, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[10]  Marissa Miller,et al.  Long-term mechanical circulatory support (destination therapy): on track to compete with heart transplantation? , 2012, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[11]  G. Ewald,et al.  Outcomes in Advanced Heart Failure Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices for Destination Therapy , 2012, Circulation. Heart failure.

[12]  S. Schulte-Eistrup,et al.  Thrombosis of the LVAD Inflow Cannula Detected by Transthoracic Echocardiography: 2D and 3D Thrombus Visualization , 2011, Echocardiography.

[13]  N. Kapur,et al.  Management of HeartWare left ventricular assist device thrombosis using intracavitary thrombolytics. , 2011, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[14]  S. Spiliopoulos,et al.  HeartMate II ventricular assist device thrombosis-an echocardiographic approach to diagnosis: can Doppler evaluation of flow be useful? , 2011, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[15]  L. F. Moreira,et al.  Mechanical circulatory support: a great gap in Brazilian cardiac surgery. , 2010, Revista brasileira de cirurgia cardiovascular : orgao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular.

[16]  E. Birks The comparative use of ventricular assist devices: differences between Europe and the United States. , 2010, Texas Heart Institute journal.

[17]  S. Raman,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of left ventricular assist devices with cardiovascular computed tomography and impact on management. , 2010, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[18]  A. Branzi,et al.  Review of tenecteplase (TNKase) in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction , 2009, Vascular health and risk management.

[19]  I. Gregoric Exchange Techniques for Implantable Ventricular Assist Devices , 2008, ASAIO journal.

[20]  R. Koerfer,et al.  The Bad Oeynhausen Concept of INR Self-Management , 2005, Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis.