Terrestrial Water Loss at Night: Global Relevance from Observations and Climate Models

Abstract. Nocturnal water loss (NWL) from the surface into the atmosphere is often overlooked because of the absence of solar radiation to drive evapotranspiration and the measuring difficulties involved. However, there is growing evidence that suggests NWL – and particularly nocturnal transpiration – represents a considerable fraction of the daily values. Here we provide a global overview of the characteristics of NWL based on latent heat flux estimates from the FLUXNET2015 dataset, as well as from simulations of global climate models. Eddy-covariance measurements at 99 sites indicate that on average NWL represents 6.3 % of total evapotranspiration. There are six sites where NWL is higher than 15 %; these are mountain forests with considerable NWL during winter related to snowy and windy conditions. Higher vapor pressure deficit, wind speed and soil moisture are related to higher NWL, although this is not consistent across all sites. On the other hand, the global multi-model mean of terrestrial NWL is 7.9 % of total evapotranspiration. The spread of the model ensemble, however, is greater than 20 % over 70 % of the land area. Finally, the multi-model mean of future projections indicates an increase of NWL everywhere by an average of 1.8 %, but the spread between models at individual locations is often twice as large at least. Overall, this study highlights the relevance of water loss during the night and opens the door to explore its influence on the water cycle and the climate system under present and future conditions.

[1]  T. Vesala,et al.  On the separation of net ecosystem exchange into assimilation and ecosystem respiration: review and improved algorithm , 2005 .

[2]  M. Mccabe,et al.  Multi-site evaluation of terrestrial evaporation models using FLUXNET data , 2014 .

[3]  R. Leuning A critical appraisal of a combined stomatal‐photosynthesis model for C3 plants , 1995 .

[4]  A. Goldstein,et al.  What the towers don't see at night: nocturnal sap flow in trees and shrubs at two AmeriFlux sites in California. , 2007, Tree physiology.

[5]  G. Collatz,et al.  Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration: a model that includes a laminar boundary layer , 1991 .

[6]  Michael A. Forster,et al.  Interactive effects of elevated CO2 and drought on nocturnal water fluxes in Eucalyptus saligna. , 2011, Tree physiology.

[7]  Gabriel G. Katul,et al.  Nocturnal evapotranspiration in eddy-covariance records from three co-located ecosystems in the Southeastern U.S.: Implications for annual fluxes , 2009 .

[8]  Eric F. Wood,et al.  Global estimates of evapotranspiration for climate studies using multi-sensor remote sensing data: Evaluation of three process-based approaches , 2011 .

[9]  J. Lewis,et al.  Consequences of nocturnal water loss: a synthesis of regulating factors and implications for capacitance, embolism and use in models. , 2014, Tree physiology.

[10]  I. E. Woodrow,et al.  A Model Predicting Stomatal Conductance and its Contribution to the Control of Photosynthesis under Different Environmental Conditions , 1987 .

[11]  N. Phillips,et al.  Interspecific variation in nighttime transpiration and stomatal conductance in a mixed New England deciduous forest. , 2006, Tree physiology.

[12]  J. Richards,et al.  Nighttime Stomatal Conductance and Transpiration in C3 and C4 Plants1[W] , 2006, Plant Physiology.

[13]  Paolo De Angelis,et al.  Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modelling stomatal conductance , 2011 .

[14]  Sonia I. Seneviratne,et al.  A site-level comparison of lysimeter and eddy covariance flux measurements of evapotranspiration , 2015 .

[15]  H. Vereecken,et al.  Quantification and Prediction of Nighttime Evapotranspiration for Two Distinct Grassland Ecosystems , 2019, Water Resources Research.

[16]  B. Medlyn,et al.  On the minimum leaf conductance: its role in models of plant water use, and ecological and environmental controls. , 2018, The New phytologist.

[17]  M. Heimann,et al.  Comprehensive comparison of gap-filling techniques for eddy covariance net carbon fluxes , 2007 .

[18]  Bert G. Heusinkveld,et al.  Contribution of dew to the water budget of a grassland area in the Netherlands , 2006 .

[19]  M. Wu,et al.  Principles of environmental physics , 2004, Plant Growth Regulation.

[20]  D. Baldocchi Assessing the eddy covariance technique for evaluating carbon dioxide exchange rates of ecosystems: past, present and future , 2003 .

[21]  Dario Papale,et al.  Observational Data Patterns for Time Series Data Quality Assessment , 2014, 2014 IEEE 10th International Conference on e-Science.

[22]  J. Monteith Evaporation and environment. , 1965, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology.

[23]  G. Wessolek,et al.  Technical note: Improving the AWAT filter with interpolation schemes for advanced processing of high resolution data , 2016 .

[24]  M. Migliavacca,et al.  Basic and extensible post-processing of eddy covariance flux data with REddyProc , 2018, Biogeosciences.

[25]  J. T. Ball,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE , 1988 .

[26]  J. Fisher,et al.  Nighttime transpiration in woody plants from contrasting ecosystems. , 2007, Tree physiology.

[27]  H. L. Penman Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass , 1948, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[28]  A. Arneth,et al.  Immediate and potential long-term effects of consecutive heat waves on the photosynthetic performance and water balance in Douglas-fir. , 2016, Journal of plant physiology.

[29]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  The future of evapotranspiration: Global requirements for ecosystem functioning, carbon and climate feedbacks, agricultural management, and water resources , 2017 .

[30]  H. Vereecken,et al.  Towards an unbiased filter routine to determine precipitation and evapotranspiration from high precision lysimeter measurements , 2017 .

[31]  M. Zeppel,et al.  Representing nighttime and minimum conductance in CLM4.5: global hydrology and carbon sensitivity analysis using observational constraints , 2017 .

[32]  K. Snyder,et al.  Night-time conductance in C3 and C4 species: do plants lose water at night? , 2003, Journal of experimental botany.

[33]  Andre Peters,et al.  Separating precipitation and evapotranspiration from noise – a new filter routine for high-resolution lysimeter data , 2013 .

[34]  Tomas Vitvar,et al.  Swiss prealpine Rietholzbach research catchment and lysimeter: 32 year time series and 2003 drought event , 2012 .

[35]  G. Hsiao,et al.  The nocturnal water cycle in an open‐canopy forest , 2013 .

[36]  Pedro Viterbo,et al.  The land surface‐atmosphere interaction: A review based on observational and global modeling perspectives , 1996 .

[37]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment , 2010, Nature.

[38]  M. Mauder,et al.  Towards a consistent eddy-covariance processing: an intercomparison of EddyPro and TK3 , 2014 .

[39]  B. Medlyn,et al.  Nocturnal stomatal conductance responses to rising [CO2], temperature and drought. , 2012, The New phytologist.

[40]  Y. Hong,et al.  Vegetation Greening and Climate Change Promote Multidecadal Rises of Global Land Evapotranspiration , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[41]  H. Vereecken,et al.  Determining dew and hoar frost formation for a low mountain range and alpine grassland site by weighable lysimeter , 2018, Journal of Hydrology.

[42]  Jacques Roy,et al.  Processes driving nocturnal transpiration and implications for estimating land evapotranspiration , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[43]  D. Randall,et al.  A Revised Land Surface Parameterization (SiB2) for Atmospheric GCMS. Part I: Model Formulation , 1996 .

[44]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Comparative Study of a Long‐Established Large Weighing Lysimeter and a State‐of‐the‐Art Mini‐lysimeter , 2018 .