A scientometric analysis of 15 years of CHINZ conferences

CHINZ is the annual conference of the New Zealand Chapter of the Special Interest Group for Computer-Human Interaction (SIGCHI) of the ACM. In this paper we analyse the history of CHINZ through citations, authorship and online presence. CHINZ appears to compare well with the larger APCHI conference on citation-based measures. 42% of CHINZ papers were found as open access versions on the web.

[1]  Péter Jacsó,et al.  The pros and cons of computing the h-index using Google Scholar , 2008, Online Inf. Rev..

[2]  Dana McKay,et al.  What's my name again?: sociotechnical considerations for author name management in research databases , 2010, OZCHI '10.

[3]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Green and Gold Open Access Percentages and Growth, by Discipline , 2012, ArXiv.

[4]  David M. Nichols,et al.  Usability in Aotearoa/New Zealand , 2011, Global Usability.

[5]  Jun Hu,et al.  Scientometric analysis of the CHI proceedings , 2009, CHI.

[6]  Raymond Lister,et al.  A Citation Analysis of the ACSC 2006-2008 Proceedings, with Reference to the CORE Conference and Journal Rankings , 2009, ACSC.

[7]  Scott E. Delman.  ACM offers a new approach to self-archiving , 2011, CACM.

[8]  Judit Bar-Ilan,et al.  Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar , 2008, Scientometrics.

[9]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[10]  Jacques Wainer,et al.  What happens to computer science research after it is published? Tracking CS research lines , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[11]  Joseph Kaye,et al.  Some statistical analyses of CHI , 2009, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[12]  Massimo Franceschet,et al.  A comparison of bibliometric indicators for computer science scholars and journals on Web of Science and Google Scholar , 2010, Scientometrics.

[13]  Christoph Bartneck.  The end of the beginning: a reflection on the first five years of the HRI conference , 2010, Scientometrics.

[14]  Lokman I. Meho,et al.  Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[15]  Martin Fenner,et al.  ORCID: Unique Identifiers for Authors and Contributors , 2011 .

[16]  Fytton Rowland,et al.  The citation advantage of open-access articles , 2008 .

[17]  Alfonso E. Romero,et al.  Scientific impact evaluation and the effect of self-citations: Mitigating the bias by discounting the h-index , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[18]  Bo-Christer Björk,et al.  Anatomy of green open access , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[19]  Jorge Gonçalves,et al.  Identity crisis of ubicomp?: mapping 15 years of the field's development and paradigm change , 2014, UbiComp.