SOME IMPLICATIONS OF DIRECT POSITIVE INTERACTIONS FOR COMMUNITY SPECIES DIVERSITY

Direct positive interactions (mutualisms and commensalisms) are generally accepted as important processes in communities. They appear to be most common in environments with relatively high physical disturbance, stress, or predation, where associated species can increase the growth and survival of other species unable to survive in isolation. Although ecologists have documented direct positive interactions among species for decades, there is less known about how these interactions affect community species diversity patterns. In this paper, we present a qualitative theoretical model that considers how direct positive interactions affect community species diversity. The model uses, as its basis, familiar unimodel species diversity models (i.e., “compensatory mortality” and “intermediate disturbance” hypothesis) to understand where direct positive interactions are likely to be important. Initially, it predicts that direct positive interactions increase species diversity by facilitating species that might not normally survive under very high physical disturbance, stress, or predation. In addition, it suggests that, under intermediate physical disturbance, stress, or predation, facilitator species that might normally be competitively excluded are released from competition. We suggest that facilitator species may then create new interaction webs that would not be possible in their absence. To illustrate these ideas, we describe a case study taken from a New England salt marsh community where a gradient in physical conditions occurs. In this community, direct positive interactions, and their indirect effects, are predicted to increase the species diversity by at least 35%. This empirical case study and model show that by incorporating direct positive interactions into ecological experiments and theory, it is possible to expand our understanding of the mechanisms responsible for community species diversity patterns.

[1]  C. E. Bach,et al.  Effects of a Specialist Herbivore (Altica Subplicata) on Salix Cordata and Sand Dune Succession , 1994 .

[2]  P. Petraitis,et al.  The Maintenance of Species Diversity by Disturbance , 1989, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[3]  C. H. Muller THE ASSOCIATION OF DESERT ANNUALS WITH SHRUBS , 1953 .

[4]  R. Paine Food webs : linkage, interaction strength and community infrastructure , 1980 .

[5]  R. Callaway,et al.  FACILITATIVE AND INTERFERING EFFECTS OF ARTHROCNEMUM SUBTERMINALE ON WINTER ANNUALS , 1994 .

[6]  A. Ellison Effects of Competition, Disturbance, and Herbivory on Salicornia Europaea , 1987 .

[7]  W. Schlesinger,et al.  Competition and facilitation : Contrasting effects of Artemisia tridentata on desert vs. montane pines , 1996 .

[8]  J. Connell Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. , 1978, Science.

[9]  J. Timothy Wootton,et al.  Indirect Effects, Prey Susceptibility, and Habitat Selection: Impacts of Birds on Limpets and Algae , 1992 .

[10]  John H. Lawton,et al.  What Do Species Do in Ecosystems , 1994 .

[11]  P. Dayton,et al.  Role of biological disturbance in maintaining diversity in the deep sea , 1972 .

[12]  M. Bertness Interspecific Interactions among High Marsh Perennials in a New England Salt Marsh , 1991 .

[13]  B. Menge,et al.  Species Diversity Gradients: Synthesis of the Roles of Predation, Competition, and Temporal Heterogeneity , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[14]  P. Kareiva,et al.  Experimental and Mathematical Analyses of Herbivore Movement: Quantifying the Influence of Plant Spacing and Quality on Foraging Discrimination , 1982 .

[15]  L. Walker,et al.  Competition and facilitation: a synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities , 1997 .

[16]  M. Bertness,et al.  Competition and Facilitation in Marsh Plants , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[17]  P. Vitousek,et al.  Biological Diversity and Terrestrial Ecosystem Biogeochemistry , 1994 .

[18]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Mechanisms of Primary Succession Following Deglaciation at Glacier Bay, Alaska , 1994 .

[19]  M. Bertness,et al.  Trophic Consequences of a Positive Plant Interaction , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[20]  P. R. Atsatt,et al.  Plant Defense Guilds , 1976, Science.

[21]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Concepts in Ecological Models , 1987 .

[22]  G. E. Hutchinson,et al.  Homage to Santa Rosalia or Why Are There So Many Kinds of Animals? , 1959, The American Naturalist.

[23]  A. Underwood,et al.  11. Paradigms, Explanations, and Generalizations in Models for the Structure of Intertidal Communities on Rocky Shores , 1984 .

[24]  B. Carlsson,et al.  Positive Plant Interactions in Tundra Vegetation and the Importance of Shelter , 1991 .

[25]  T. Miller,et al.  Direct and Indirect Species Interactions in an Early Old-Field Plant Community , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[26]  P. Turchin,et al.  Modelling the effect of host patch size on Mexican bean beetle emigration , 1986 .

[27]  R. Steneck,et al.  A functional group approach to the structure of algal-dominated communities , 1994 .

[28]  R. Moral,et al.  Mechanisms of Early Primary Succession in Subalpine Habitats on Mount St. Helens , 1987 .

[29]  S. Gaines,et al.  A Unified Approach to Marine Plant-Herbivore Interactions. I. Populations and Communities , 1981 .

[30]  Donald R. Strong,et al.  ARE TROPHIC CASCADES ALL WET? DIFFERENTIATION AND DONOR-CONTROL IN SPECIOSE ECOSYSTEMS' , 1992 .

[31]  M. Bertness,et al.  MORPHOLOGICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF A POSITIVE PLANT INTERACTION , 1995 .

[32]  L. Slobodkin,et al.  Community Structure, Population Control, and Competition , 1960, The American Naturalist.

[33]  W. K. Dodds Community structure and selection for positive or negative species interactions , 1988 .

[34]  Kathleen H. Keeler,et al.  The Ecology of Mutualism , 1982 .

[35]  R. B. Root Organization of a Plant-Arthropod Association in Simple and Diverse Habitats: The Fauna of Collards (Brassica Oleracea) , 1973 .

[36]  R. Paine A Note on Trophic Complexity and Community Stability , 1969, The American Naturalist.

[37]  B. Menge,et al.  Keystone predation and interaction strength : Interactive effects of predators on their main prey , 1996 .

[38]  P. Dayton Competition, Disturbance, and Community Organization: The Provision and Subsequent Utilization of Space in a Rocky Intertidal Community , 1971 .

[39]  D. J. Hall,et al.  AN EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH TO THE PRODUCTION DYNAMICS AND STRUCTURE OF FRESHWATER ANIMAL COMMUNITIES1 , 1970 .

[40]  Wayne P. Sousa,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS OF DISTURBANCE AND ECOLOGICAL SUCCESSION IN A ROCKY INTERTIDAL ALGAL COMMUNITY , 1979 .

[41]  M. Hay The functional morphology of turf-forming seaweeds: persistence in stressful marine habitats , 1981 .

[42]  M. Hay,et al.  Functional morphology of intertidal seaweeds: adaptive significance of aggregate vs. solitary forms , 1984 .

[43]  George H. Leonard,et al.  THE ROLE OF POSITIVE INTERACTIONS IN COMMUNITIES: LESSONS FROM INTERTIDAL HABITATS , 1997 .

[44]  J. Timothy Wootton,et al.  PREDICTING DIRECT AND INDIRECT EFFECTS: AN INTEGRATED APPROACH USING EXPERIMENTS AND PATH ANALYSIS' , 1994 .

[45]  D. Doak,et al.  The Keystone-Species Concept in Ecology and ConservationManagement and policy must explicitly consider the complexity of interactions in natural systems , 1993 .

[46]  J. Lawton,et al.  Organisms as ecosystem engineers , 1994 .

[47]  J. Coddington,et al.  Spider (Araneae) Community Structure in an Intertidal Salt Marsh: Effects of Vegetation Structure and Tidal Flooding , 1990 .

[48]  S. Pennings Indirect Interactions on Coral Reefs , 1997 .

[49]  R. Paine A Short‐Term Experimental Investigation of Resource Partitioning in a New Zealand Rocky Intertidal Habitat , 1971 .

[50]  Peter M. Vitousek,et al.  Nutrient Cycling and Nutrient Use Efficiency , 1982, The American Naturalist.

[51]  M. Hixon,et al.  Damselfish as Keystone Species in Reverse: Intermediate Disturbance and Diversity of Reef Algae , 1983, Science.

[52]  S. McNaughton Serengeti Ungulates: Feeding Selectivity Influences the Effectiveness of Plant Defense Guilds , 1978, Science.

[53]  J. Wilson,et al.  Positive-feedback Switches in Plant Communities , 1992 .

[54]  M. Dethier,et al.  An "Indirect Commensalism" between Marine Herbivores and the Importance of Competitive Hierarchies , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[55]  D. Macisaac,et al.  Nucleation during primary succession in the Canadian Rockies , 1993 .

[56]  M. Bertness,et al.  Physical Stress and Positive Associations Among Marsh Plants , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[57]  M. Bertness,et al.  Positive interactions in communities. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[58]  P. Nobel,et al.  Interactions Between Seedlings of Agave Deserti and the Nurse Plant Hilaria Rigida , 1988 .

[59]  J. Witman,et al.  SUBTIDAL COEXISTENCE: STORMS, GRAZING, MUTUALISM, AND THE ZONATION OF KELPS AND MUSSELS' , 1987 .

[60]  W. Sousa Disturbance in Marine Intertidal Boulder Fields: The Nonequilibrium Maintenance of Species Diversity , 1979 .

[61]  L. Harris,et al.  Community Recovery After Storm Damage: A Case of Facilitation in Primary Succession , 1984, Science.

[62]  B. Menge,et al.  Indirect Effects in Marine Rocky Intertidal Interaction Webs: Patterns and Importance , 1995 .

[63]  J. Harper The role of predation in vegetational diversity. , 1969, Brookhaven symposia in biology.

[64]  C. Moreno,et al.  Man as a predator in the intertidal zone of southern Chile , 1984 .

[65]  R. Paine,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF GRAZING BY SEA URCHINS, STRONGYLOCENTROTUS SPP., ON BENTHIC ALGAL POPULATIONS1 , 1969 .

[66]  J. Connell,et al.  The Ecological Regulation of Species Diversity , 1964, The American Naturalist.

[67]  M. Huston A General Hypothesis of Species Diversity , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[68]  R. Paine,et al.  Ecological Determinism in the Competition for Space: The Robert H. MacArthur Award Lecture , 1984 .

[69]  Joseph Travis,et al.  The Evolutionary Role of Indirect Effects in Communities , 1996 .

[70]  M. Power,et al.  The keystone cops meet in Hilo. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[71]  C. S. Holling Cross-Scale Morphology, Geometry, and Dynamics of Ecosystems , 1992 .

[72]  Hal Caswell,et al.  Predator-Mediated Coexistence: A Nonequilibrium Model , 1978, The American Naturalist.

[73]  B. Menge,et al.  Community Regulation: Variation in Disturbance, Competition, and Predation in Relation to Environmental Stress and Recruitment , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[74]  J. Lawton Ecological Experiments with Model Systems , 1995, Science.

[75]  Jonathan Roughgarden,et al.  Evolution of Marine Symbiosis‐‐A Simple Cost‐Benefit Model , 1975 .

[76]  B. Walker Biodiversity and Ecological Redundancy , 1992 .

[77]  P. Abrams Monotonic or unimodal diversity-productivity gradients : what does competition theory predict? , 1995 .

[78]  E. Berlow,et al.  The Keystone Species Concept: Variation in Interaction Strength in a Rocky Intertidal Habitat , 1994 .

[79]  R. Paine,et al.  Disturbance, patch formation, and community structure. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[80]  John Vandermeer,et al.  Indirect Mutualism: Variations on a Theme by Stephen Levine , 1980, The American Naturalist.

[81]  R. Macarthur,et al.  On Bird Species Diversity , 1961 .

[82]  D. Duggins Kelp Beds and Sea Otters: An Experimental Approach , 1980 .

[83]  M. Bertness,et al.  A Herbivore Paradox: Why Salt Marsh Aphids Live on Poor-Quality Plants , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[84]  J. Lawton,et al.  Declining biodiversity can alter the performance of ecosystems , 1994, Nature.

[85]  J. Lubchenco Plant Species Diversity in a Marine Intertidal Community: Importance of Herbivore Food Preference and Algal Competitive Abilities , 1978, The American Naturalist.

[86]  R. Paine,et al.  The Pisaster-Tegula Interaction: Prey Patches, Predator Food Preference, and Intertidal Community Structure , 1969 .

[87]  R. Callaway Effect of Shrubs on Recruitment of Quercus Douglasii and Quercus Lobata in California , 1992 .

[88]  J. Verwey CORAL REEF STUDIES . I. THE SYMBIOSIS BETWEEN DAMSELFISHES AND SEA ANEMONES IN BATAVIA BAY. , 1930 .

[89]  L. C. Bliss,et al.  Microscale pattern of vascular plant distribution in two high arctic plant communities , 1984 .

[90]  M. Hay Associational Plant Defenses and the Maintenance of Species Diversity: Turning Competitors Into Accomplices , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[91]  J. Caperon,et al.  Coral-Eating Sea Stars Acanthaster planci in Hawaii , 1971, Science.

[92]  D. Janzen Herbivores and the Number of Tree Species in Tropical Forests , 1970, The American Naturalist.

[93]  J. Bronstein Our Current Understanding of Mutualism , 1994, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[94]  V. J. Chapman,et al.  Salt Marshes and Salt Deserts of the World. , 1960 .

[95]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Limiting Similarity, Convergence, and Divergence of Coexisting Species , 1967, The American Naturalist.

[96]  R. Callaway,et al.  Temperature‐Driven Variation in Substrate Oxygenation and the Balance of Competition and Facilitation , 1996 .

[97]  J. Lawton,et al.  Enemy free space and the structure of ecological communities , 1984 .

[98]  Aaron M. Ellison,et al.  Determinants of Pattern in a New England Salt Marsh Plant Community , 1987 .

[99]  R. Macarthur,et al.  Environmental Factors Affecting Bird Species Diversity , 1964, The American Naturalist.

[100]  J. Battey,et al.  Population trends among Jamaican reef corals , 1981, Nature.

[101]  P. Dayton Experimental Evaluation of Ecological Dominance in a Rocky Intertidal Algal Community , 1975 .

[102]  P. Kareiva Diversity and sustainability on the prairie , 1996, Nature.

[103]  A. Tansley,et al.  Studies of the Vegetation of the English Chalk: III. The Chalk Grasslands of Hampshire-Sussex Border , 1925 .

[104]  J. Lawton,et al.  POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF ORGANISMS AS PHYSICAL ECOSYSTEM ENGINEERS , 1997 .

[105]  R. F. Griggs Competition and Succession on a Rocky Mountain Fellfield , 1956 .

[106]  R. Paine,et al.  Intertidal Landscapes: Disturbance and the Dynamics of Pattern , 1981 .

[107]  P. Fairweather Is predation capable of interacting with other community processes on rocky reefs , 1990 .

[108]  J. Witman,et al.  Refuges, Biological Disturbance, and Rocky Subtidal Community Structure in New England , 1985 .

[109]  Teresa Turner,et al.  Facilitation as a Successional Mechanism in a Rocky Intertidal Community , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[110]  J. Downing,et al.  Biodiversity and stability in grasslands , 1996, Nature.

[111]  L. Aarssen,et al.  Plants Helping PlantsNew evidence indicates that beneficence is important in vegetation , 1988 .

[112]  D. Tilman,et al.  Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems , 1996, Nature.

[113]  P. Yodzis,et al.  The phylogenetic distribution of obligate mutualism: evidence of limiting similarity and global instability , 1982 .

[114]  R. Macarthur,et al.  COMPETITION, HABITAT SELECTION, AND CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT IN A PATCHY ENVIRONMENT. , 1964, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[115]  R. Whittaker,et al.  The Saguaro: A Population in Relation to Environment. , 1963, Science.

[116]  B. L. Howes,et al.  Oxidation‐reduction potentials in a salt marsh: Spatial patterns and interactions with primary production1 , 1981 .

[117]  R. Paine Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity , 1966, The American Naturalist.