Underutilization of BRCA1/2 testing to guide breast cancer treatment: Black and Hispanic women particularly at risk

Purpose: Women with early-onset (age ≤40 years) breast cancer are at high risk of carrying deleterious mutations in the BRCA1/2 genes; genetic assessment is thus recommended. Knowledge of BRCA1/2 mutation status is useful in guiding treatment decisions. To date, there has been no national study of BRCA1/2 testing among newly diagnosed women.Methods: We used administrative data (2004–2007) from a national sample of 14.4 million commercially insured patients to identify newly diagnosed, early-onset breast cancer cases among women aged 20–40 years (n = 1474). Cox models assessed BRCA1/2 testing, adjusting for covariates and differential lengths of follow-up.Results: Overall, 30% of women aged 40 years or younger received BRCA1/2 testing. In adjusted analyses, women of Jewish ethnicity were significantly more likely to be tested (hazard ratio = 2.83, 95% confidence interval: 1.52–5.28), whereas black women (hazard ratio = 0.34, 95% 0.18–0.64) and Hispanic women (hazard ratio = 0.52, 95% confidence interval: 0.33–0.81) were significantly less likely to be tested than non-Jewish white women. Those enrolled in a health maintenance organization (hazard ratio = 0.73, 95% confidence interval: 0.54–0.99) were significantly less likely to receive BRCA1/2 testing than those point of service insurance plans. Testing rates increased sharply for women diagnosed in 2007 compared with 2004.Conclusions: In this national sample of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer at high risk for BRCA1/2 mutations, genetic assessment was low, with marked racial differences in testing.

[1]  Katrina Armstrong,et al.  Interest in BRCA1/2 testing in a primary care population. , 2002, Preventive medicine.

[2]  O. Olopade,et al.  Confronting genetic testing disparities: knowledge is power. , 2005, JAMA.

[3]  James P Evans,et al.  Increased uptake of BRCA1/2 genetic testing among African American women with a recent diagnosis of breast cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[4]  B. Rimer,et al.  Triangulating Differential Nonresponse by Race in a Telephone Survey , 2007, Preventing chronic disease.

[5]  R. Croyle,et al.  Awareness of Genetic Testing for Increased Cancer Risk in the Year 2000 National Health Interview Survey , 2004, Public Health Genomics.

[6]  M. Cabana,et al.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. , 1999, JAMA.

[7]  M. Skolnick,et al.  Statement of the American Society of Clinical Oncology : Genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. Commentaries , 1996 .

[8]  A. Jha,et al.  Concentration and quality of hospitals that care for elderly black patients. , 2007, Archives of internal medicine.

[9]  J. Coyne,et al.  Factors associated with decisions about clinical BRCA1/2 testing. , 2000, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[10]  C. Isaacs,et al.  Utilization of BRCA1/BRCA2 Mutation Testing in Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patients , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[11]  K. Armstrong,et al.  The association between race and attitudes about predictive genetic testing. , 2004, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[12]  J. Herman Evaluating women with ovarian cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: missed opportunities. , 2010, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  U. P. S. T. Force Genetic Risk Assessment and BRCA Mutation Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility: Recommendation Statement , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[14]  Ellen Warner,et al.  Contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  F. Collins,et al.  Genetics moves into the medical mainstream. , 2001, JAMA.

[16]  Bernard Challenor,et al.  Bad Blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment , 1982 .

[17]  M. Putt,et al.  Racial differences in the use of BRCA1/2 testing among women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer. , 2005, JAMA.

[18]  S. Merajver,et al.  Health insurance and discrimination concerns and BRCA1/2 testing in a clinic population. , 2002, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[19]  L. Wideroff,et al.  The Impact of Acculturation on Awareness of Genetic Testing for Increased Cancer Risk among Hispanics in the Year 2000 National Health Interview Survey , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[20]  R. Hasnain-Wynia,et al.  Disparities in health care are driven by where minority patients seek care: examination of the hospital quality alliance measures. , 2007, Archives of internal medicine.

[21]  E. Rosenthal Shortage of Genetics Counselors May be Anecdotal, but Need is Real , 2007 .

[22]  Deborah Schrag,et al.  Primary care physicians who treat blacks and whites. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  T. Rebbeck,et al.  Breast cancer risk following bilateral oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: an international case-control study. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  K. Offit,et al.  Psychosocial predictors of BRCA counseling and testing decisions among urban African-American women. , 2002, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[25]  C. Isaacs,et al.  Ethnic differences in knowledge and attitudes about BRCA1 testing in women at increased risk. , 1997, Patient education and counseling.

[26]  T. Eberlein Hospital Factors and Racial Disparities in Mortality After Surgery for Breast and Colon Cancer , 2011 .

[27]  James H. Jones Bad Blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment , 1981 .

[28]  J. Garber,et al.  Guidelines for Genetic Risk Assessment of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: Early Disagreements and Low Utilization , 2009, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[29]  Ahmedin Jemal,et al.  Cancer Disparities by Race/Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status , 2004, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[30]  S. Neuhausen,et al.  Prevalence of BRCA Mutations and Founder Effect in High-Risk Hispanic Families , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[31]  Colorectal cancer screening. , 1991, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[32]  Adopted on March American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  D. Levy,et al.  Differential use of available genetic tests among primary care physicians in the United States: results of a national survey , 2008, Genetics in Medicine.

[34]  A. Hendricks,et al.  Measuring quality of care: fundamental information from administrative datasets. , 1994, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[35]  M. Cho,et al.  How Do Women Decide? Accepting or Declining BRCA1/2 Testing in a Nationwide Clinical Sample in the United States , 2006, Public Health Genomics.

[36]  Sean V Tavtigian,et al.  Clinical characteristics of individuals with germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2: analysis of 10,000 individuals. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[37]  B. Ward,et al.  BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in women of different ethnicities undergoing testing for hereditary breast‐ovarian cancer , 2009, Cancer.