Using economic benefits for recycling in a separate collection centre managed as a "reverse supermarket": a sociological survey.

Separate collection centres (SCCs), where citizens can deliver recyclable fractions of municipal solid waste (MSW), in an "urban mining" perspective, can be considered a sort of "reverse supermarket", where people can deliver their recyclables in order to either obtain a waste fee reduction or shopping vouchers. The latter is the case of Baronissi, a town of around 17,000 inhabitants in the Province of Salerno, in the Campania region of Italy. The principal aim of the study was to investigate by means of a sociological survey the relationship between citizens and the separate collection program, with particular emphasis on the role played by the SCC. The separate collection system was evaluated either good or very good by 95.8% of the sample, while 99.2% expressed a good or very good evaluation of the quality of the service inside the separate collection centre: SCC users acted as a community as highlighted by the negative response of the Chi-square test for independence. Respecting the environment prevailed over saving time, obtaining eco-points, or saving money as the main reason why people went to the SCC. The majority of the respondents agreed if only putrescibles and residue should be collected directly from their homes, while all the other materials should be collected exclusively at the SCC, allowing to save money for the management of the kerbside collection system with a consequent further waste fee reduction for the residents.

[1]  A. B. Palacio,et al.  Recycling Behavior , 2005 .

[2]  Vicki F. Sharp,et al.  Statistics for the social sciences , 1979 .

[3]  Stuart Oskamp,et al.  Factors Influencing Community Residents' Participation in Commingled Curbside Recycling Programs , 1994 .

[4]  Joanne Vining,et al.  What Makes a Recycler? , 1990 .

[5]  A. Shapiro,et al.  Household Willingness to Recycle Electronic Waste , 2006 .

[6]  S. Tripetchkul,et al.  Enhancing organic waste separation at the source behavior: A case study of the application of motivation mechanisms in communities in Thailand , 2015 .

[7]  Giovanni De Feo,et al.  Sociological survey in a municipality with a high level separate collection programme in an area of historic unpopularity. , 2014 .

[8]  Ian D. Williams,et al.  Social, cultural and structural influences on household waste recycling: A case study , 2006 .

[9]  Qing Li,et al.  A novel Likert scale based on fuzzy sets theory , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[10]  Anna Björklund,et al.  Flexible and robust strategies for waste management in Sweden. , 2007, Waste management.

[11]  P. Stern,et al.  Influences on Attitude-Behavior Relationships , 1995 .

[12]  Shaufique Fahmi Sidique,et al.  The effects of behavior and attitudes on drop-off recycling activities , 2010 .

[13]  Ian D Williams,et al.  Public perception of odour and environmental pollution attributed to MSW treatment and disposal facilities: a case study. , 2013, Waste management.

[14]  Kara Chan,et al.  Mass communication and pro-environmental behaviour: waste recycling in Hong Kong , 1998 .

[15]  O. Ojedokun,et al.  Attitude towards littering as a mediator of the relationship between personality attributes and responsible environmental behavior. , 2011, Waste management.

[16]  Marie K. Harder,et al.  Systematic studies of shop and leisure voucher incentives for household recycling , 2007 .

[17]  Giovanni De Feo,et al.  Siting landfills and incinerators in areas of historic unpopularity: surveying the views of the next generation. , 2013, Waste management.

[18]  Sabino De Gisi,et al.  Domestic Separation and Collection of Municipal Solid Waste: Opinion and Awareness of Citizens and Workers , 2010 .

[19]  Leenard Baas,et al.  Getting serious about mining the technosphere: a review of recent landfill mining and urban mining research , 2013 .

[20]  Sabino De Gisi,et al.  Public opinion and awareness towards MSW and separate collection programmes: A sociological procedure for selecting areas and citizens with a low level of knowledge , 2010 .